- Clearest sign yet of Conservatives grappling with their new electoral coalition and the political geography created by the 2019 general election
-Local/mayoral elections also clearly in mind.
- Economically for the next few years steady as she goes.
-but after that bigger changes to corporation tax/personal taxation and Sunak hinted might be more to come to "Pay off" cost of pandemic.
-Question is- why? As I reported last night, BoE financing our deficit/long maturity of our debt means pressure is minimal.
-Esp so given...
...OBR is forecasting pretty weak below trend growth beyond 2022. Many economists will argue best way to tackle debt and deficit is through growth and inflation.
-Other question is why set that out now, when there's so little foresight of what economy will look like.
-Nonetheless, although it was a traditional Conservative emphasis on deficit reduction, it was an untraditional way of doing it, focussing on taxation rather than spending cuts- a substantial change compared to the Osbornite approach.
-But if Chancellor is serious...
...about deficit reduction, I suspect spending cuts or severe restraint will return. And in that case, given huge pressure to come on NHS/Social care/education, is going to be a problem (areas of spending which didn't get much of a mention/sense of plan).
-Also no sense of plan on welfare beyond extension on UC til October. Would be astonished if it isn't extended again given economic situation for those families will barely have improved. In which case, begs the question, what is point of these one off measures?
And no mention of Brexit which whether you're pro or not, cannot be denied is having a major effect on the operation of thousands of British businesses.
According to OBR Chancellor already making future spending cuts in departmental budgets “around £4bn a year more of annual departmental spending plans”
OBR says tax rises announced in the budget takes the tax burden from 34% to 35% in 2025-26- its highest level since a Roy Jenkins was Chancellor in the late 1960s.
This is crucial. There are huge questions around how the NHS catches up with the enormous backlog that has been created as well as ongoing pandemic related costs (not to mention soc care)-these are the huge unanswered questions from today with big potential fiscal consequences.
"Faced with these post-pandemic pressures, the Government has so far cut more than £15 billion a year from departmental resource spending from 2022-23 onwards, setting up a challenging Spending Review later this year."
Necessary reminder for all the talk of sky high public spending. OBR forecasts that as a share of GDP it will shortly return to levels just above that of the last 15 years or so.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chancellor: "It's going to take the country and the whole world a long time to recover from this situation...once we're on the way to recovery we will need to begin fixing the public finances and I want to be honest today about our plans to do that."
Early nod to the deficit.
As I reported last night there really is no need in the short or medium term for the Chancellor to be concerned about borrowing. How political rather than economic his approach is going to be will depend very much what he means by "once we're on the way to recovery"
Sunak says OBR forecasts that UK economy will return to its previous size six months earlier than forecast
But OBR says that in five years time British economy will be 3% smaller than it would have been
That is presumably on top of the forecast growth lost as a result of Brexit
Nicola Sturgeon is giving evidence and providing an opening statement
“As a result of a mistake which was made, a very serious mistake- two women were failed and taxpayers’ money lost. I deeply regret that.”
“Although I was not aware of the error at the time I want to take the opportunity to apologise to the women involved and to the Scottish public.
My actions deserve to be scrutinised...firstly on the 8th Jan 2019 I volunteered to Parliament my contact with Alex Salmond...”
“I stated as follows: on 2nd April 2018 he informed me about the complaints against him. I will explain why I stand by that statement. Second, I will set out why I did not immediately record the April meeting within the Scottish govt a decision rooted entirely with my desire...”
Question: what is the public interest reason for this video, exactly? It isn’t unlike a party political broadcast but in this case paid for (and branded) by HM Treasury.
Conservative former International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell on c4 news on the Yemen aid cut: “it’s a very dark day for a country which has been a poverty superpower.”
Says wider UK development cuts will lead to 100,000s of avoidable deaths, many of them children.
“To cut aid to Yemen, the poorest country by miles in the M East, in the middle of a pandemic when we know they are famine conditions and famine is stalking the land, with 4 million, many children as a result of this decision continue the agonising process of starving to death.”
Extraordinary moment that a Conservative former Cabinet Minister saying a decision of his own government will lead to more deaths of children in Yemen.
It’s the second time a former president of the fifth republic has been given a sentence.
Reports say Sarkozy will serve at least the first part of his sentence at home wearing an electronic tag.
An extraordinary and humiliating end to his political life. When elected he said he wanted to be France’s Thatcher,the Republic’s great reformer. Instead he is in disgrace.