@SecBlinken gave an important speech today, outlining the pillars of Biden Admin foreign policy. It was a departure in several major ways--not just from Trump policies but from those of the Obama Era and before. It deserves careful attention and recognition for its soundness.
Blinken framed the speech noting that the questions confronting American foreign policymakers "aren't the same as they were in 2017 or 2009." He said, "This is a different time...so we're looking at the world with fresh eyes."
From there he enumerated eight core issues: stopping COVID, ending the global economic crisis, renewing democracy (at home and abroad), reforming our immigration system, revitalizing "ties with our allies and partners," tackling the climate crisis & leading a green revolution...
Next, seventh was "securing our leadership in technology" and finally eighth, framed as "the biggest geopolitical test of the 21st Century" was managing the relationship with China.
The speech will resonate because of what is prioritized and what is not. For the first time in the century, combatting terrorism is not among the top priorities. Saber rattling and pounding our chests and proclaiming our exceptionalism are nowhere to be found.
Instead, there is a humility to the speech unusual in US foreign policy. A recognition that in key areas, we have much work to do, a return to the core ideas of the post WWII era that our strength begins at home and with our values.
Blinken observed "More than at any other time in my career--maybe in my lifetime--distinctions between our domestic and foreign policy have simply fallen away. Our domestic renewal and our strength in the world are completely entwined."
He also states, earlier in the address, "We will not promote democracy through costly military interventions or attempting to overthrow authoritarian regimes by force. We have tried these tactics in the past. However well intentioned, they have not worked."
Considering America's track record, those are words many of our allies and fair critics have long hoped to hear. It is clear that diplomacy is being given a place of centrality by @POTUS and @SecBlinken that it has not had in a long time. And that is wise and overdue.
The speech ends with Blinken saying the US will lead "with our values." He says, "At At our best, the US is a country with integrity and a heart. That’s what makes us proud to be Americans and why so many people around the world have given everything to become Americans."
Then, in stark contrast to the previous administration, he enumerates human rights, democracy, rule of law, justice for women and girls, LGBTQI people, religious minorities and all races and ethnicities as priorities.
Such speeches are invariably aspirational. They are just notes on a work in progress. But with this address and the administration's outlining its nat'l security priorities as it also did today, there is much to reflect on and take comfort in from Blinken's address.
America is back, but we are changed. Our hopes are not diminished nor is our commitment to leading again & to working with our allies to achieve them. But we have also faced many hard lessons in the past two decades and it is clear this gov't intends to apply what we've learned.
The US is resolute where it must be and committed to maintaining the strength it sees as an essential stabilizer and guarantor of security for itself and its allies. But the bullying and braggadocio of recent administrations is long gone.
It is a speech that will no doubt be well received by our friends and allies as it puts us much more in alignment with them and that bodes well for cooperation and effective multilateralism--and thus burden sharing--in the years ahead.
As first such major addresses from a Secretary of State go, it should be seen as both a considerable success, a promise of a restoration of America's standing in the world to come and the beginning of what may well be a new and different era in US foreign policy.
Here's a link to the speech for those who would like to read it in its entirety. state.gov/a-foreign-poli…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Rothkopf

David Rothkopf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djrothkopf

27 Feb
A (v. brief) thread on the Biden Admin decision not to directly sanction MBS for his role in the murder of Jamal Khashoggi:

As I noted yesterday, I was disappointed in the fact that the admin did not impose more direct penalties on MBS for being the architect of the murder.
I did feel they generally handled the matter well otherwise, making a declassified version of the intel findings public, sanctioning Saudis close to MBS, launching a program penalizing others who persecute journalists and naming it after Khashoggi, respecting process, etc.
Not sanctioning MBS directly does send a message that top government officials who have interests that intersect with those of the US may act with impunity. It also suggested that the US so needed the Saudis that we dare not offend them by doing what is right.
Read 12 tweets
26 Feb
I'm afraid that on this, I think the WH blinked. By not specifically sanctioning MBS they send the message that top officials worldwide have impunity in the eyes of the US. They also imply that we need the Saudis more than they need us...which is untrue. An error.
I should add that the Biden policy of exposing the truth and penalizing the Saudis is light-years better than Trump's effective defense of them and rewarding them despite abuses. But being better than Trump cannot become the "don't do stupid shit" of Biden foreign policy.
Having said that, the swift declassification of the Khashoggi report, the introduction of meaningful sanctions, the broader lessons drawn by the admin, and the communications regarding their rationale was handled extremely well.
Read 4 tweets
14 Feb
When I wake up in an optimistic mood, despite yesterday's frustrating Senate outcome, I think that with each such exercise Trump is revealed more clearly, is pushed further into our past. We've had many Trump-free days since 1/20 & they are all better than the alternative.
No doubt he remains as do the malevolent fools who still do his bidding in the Senate, the House and elsewhere. But they have failed repeatedly politically, are ever-more tarnished, and are certain to be more so as the crimes of the past few years are revealed & prosecuted.
The mob remains, the threat remains and we must not be complacent about defeating it and every last vestige of it until it is gone. But with with the House Dem's victory in 2018, with Joe Biden & Kamala Harris' victory in Nov, with the small but growing GOP rejection of Trump...
Read 6 tweets
13 Feb
I've written about this before, but I am haunted by the fact that Donald Trump occupied the same office as did George Washington, that this man with no scruples nor any value at all as human being was given the same responsibilities as one with such a code of honor.
And I feel the same way as I look at the Republicans in the US Senate and think that when one generation had its Hamiltons or Jeffersons or Madisons we have Hawley and Cruz and McConnell. The hopes and aspirations of the country are no less.
The challenges are if anything greater. And yet, our government is at risk as it has been seldom before in its history because it is so full of men and women of dubious character if they have any at all.
Read 9 tweets
11 Feb
Many commentators are saying that the House impeachment managers case is so compelling and that it lays out the truth so clearly, that it will become the defining legacy of the Trump presidency. And face it, a president orchestrating a deadly coup attempt is a big deal.
But is it a bigger deal than the half a million who died of COVID, hundreds of thousands of whom would have lived had Trump not put his political interests before the public health of the US? Bigger than the massive economic crisis that accompanied that public health catastrophe?
Is it bigger than the fact that Trump was a traitor who sold out the country to Russia? Bigger than the fact that he was impeached twice? Bigger than the fact he separated families and put babies in cages? Bigger than his corruption, and nepotism?
Read 7 tweets
5 Feb
I've said this before, but it bears repeating, the "centrists" of the past four decades have primarily served Wall Street and corporate interests, bought into "trickle down-lite" economics and fueled inequality. Their influence among Dems is fading because they hurt millions.
The party and the country have moved on from 80s, post-inflation crisis, macro, bond-market driven formulations, hyper-concern about deficits, focus on top line GDP and stock mkt performance to metrics like wages, income growth, inequality, and equity.
It's not that we've abandoned the center. It's just that we realized the "centrists" were serving the few and that we needed to focus on the economy through the eyes of all Americans, notably those left behind or disadvantaged for the past forty years.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!