Even if they're allowed to sell every seat in the house, at prices most people already can't afford ($60/ticket for the top row of the balcony), most B'way shows lose money. How on earth could they make the economics of this work?
Take a long-running show that already recouped its investment, Book of Mormon. The last week it was open, it grossed $929,168, with nearly every seat sold (98%). That's $116,146 per performance.
Average ticket price was $112.67; top ticket was $477.50. broadwayworld.com/grosses.cfm
I don't know what it costs to operate the show. Has a large cast. This Crain's article says that the first year the show opened (2011), expenses averaged $634,052 weekly. Presumably higher today. Let's conservatively say $700,000, or $87,500/performance crainsnewyork.com/assets/pdf/CN1…
So to break even, with a maximum audience of 100/show, tickets would have to cost $875.00 on average. Again, most recent average price (week of March 8, 2020) was $112, and top ticket sold for $477
To make as much as it had been making before, with audience capped at 100, average ticket price would have to be $1,161.46. Obviously that seems unlikely
Now, maybe you can find 100 people willing to pay those prices for a few shows...but not really sustainable. Maybe you can get someone (landlord, cast, stagehand, etc.) to take a haircut. But would have to be a big haircut

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Catherine Rampell

Catherine Rampell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @crampell

5 Mar
Generally a strong report. Headline job growth came in above expectations (+379k), and unemployment fell for "right" reasons (more joining LF). Leisure/hospitality increased by 355,000.
But some warning signs...
*# long-term unemployed changed little over the month and is up by 3 million over the year.
*big state/local govt job losses, esp in education
*U-6 (broader measure of underemployment) still stuck at 11.1%
The jobs deficit today is finally a wee bit smaller than it was at the worst of the Great Recession, so that's an improvement! But it's not THAT much smaller...and the Great Recession was pretty awful. Image
Read 7 tweets
3 Mar
If there's "strong consensus" among economists "about lack of employment effects," that would seem to be news to economists themselves. There is a lot of uncertainty and disagreement about this question within the profession! E.g.:
igmchicago.org/surveys/the-us…
Even if you look at just the labor economists on the IGM Panel, they don't have consensus either. Asked if $15 min wage would reduce low-wage employment in some states, Altonji, Hoxby, & Shimer say yes. Autor says no. Bertrand, Hoynes say uncertain.
If anything, plurality on IGM panel overall said $15 min would reduce employment. Maybe you think they're wrong. Maybe any disemployment effects wd be small, less important than other good effects of the policy -- but don't pretend there's a "consensus" on labor effects
Read 6 tweets
1 Mar
.@Public_Citizen says it has uncovered more than a dozen last-minute Trump regulatory rollbacks that were not properly submitted to Congress in a timely manner, violating Congressional Review Act--meaning Biden admin can more easily take them off the books citizen.org/article/rollin…
these are "regulatory roll backs that remove protections for consumers, workers, immigrants, women’s health, LGTBQ communities, small farmers, and the environment, but which never took legal effect, or did so after [Biden's] January 20 regulatory 'freeze” memo.'"
among Trump's last-minute rules that were never submitted to Congress, as CRA requires, and therefore never legally went into effect: regs allowing less energy-efficient products, such as showerheads, dishwashers, washer-dryers. This was a feature of Trump rally speeches
Read 5 tweets
28 Feb
Lotta Republicans insisting on Sunday shows that GOP "policies" are quite popular/Trump CPAC comments will be focused on those "policies."
Strange claims from a party that literally abandoned any attempt to produce a policy platform last year -- just said it was pro-Trump
This is what they released last year instead of a policy platform washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-g…
So...what "policies" are they referring to? The only policy the GOP seems to reliably support is tax cuts (not even all that reliably, given Trump raised tariffs, which are taxes). The party's 2017 tax cut overhaul has been viewed unfavorably on net realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/t…
Read 4 tweets
27 Feb
I get #readermail about my “ignorence”
Someday I'm going to create a scrapbook of all the times people wrote me calling me a stuped moran or whatever. They are the best genre of #readermail
E.g.:
Read 5 tweets
24 Feb
I have been wondering if people will go back to wearing uncomfortable business clothes once the pandemic ends, or if we've been forever spoiled by a year dressing as slobs.
Apparently there is a compromise:
Similarly, been wondering if longer, shaggier hair will become more normalized/trendier (especially on men) or it will become trendy to crop hair short and sharp as a signal of finally being able to consume services outside the home and break with the covid era.
maybe there will be a compromise on hair, as with the business pajamas, and mullets will be back in fashion
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!