DA Jean Peters Baker said that the evidence is not enough to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.
Here's the thing tho, to get an indictment a prosecutor needs only to show there is probable cause a crime was committed (the same standard police need for an arrest).
In any regular case, prosecutors do not assess whether a case can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt before they charge someone or before they present their case to the grand jury.
Not to mention that there would seem to be evidence to sustain a conviction.
Police cannot investigate police shootings and prosecutors cannot make the decisions as to whether police are charged. There is an inherent conflict even if they are from different departments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2019, 3 Louisiana police troopers choked and beat Ronald Greene, repeatedly jolted him with tasers, then dragged him face-down across the pavement until his body went limp and he died.
Mr. Greene was stopped for a routine traffic violation and then chased by police. He stopped immediately, and put up his hands, saying "I'm sorry.."
There is bodycam footage of the entire encounter, although the trooper who was suspended turned his boydcam off.
Mr. Greene's family have viewed the bodycam footage, but it has not been made public.
The police department initially told the family that Mr. Greene had died in a car accident, but it was clear from his injuries that that was not the case. apnews.com/article/john-b…
It is highly relevant that the Australian cabinet minister accused of rape (who media refuse to identify) is the AG Christian Porter.
It doesn't matter whether criminal charges are sustainable. The issue is how this affects his ability to do his job. smh.com.au/politics/feder…
It's as tho people have learned nothing from the discourse in the US over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. There was no suggestion there that criminal charges could be brought. The issue was his fitness to be on the court.
The Kavanaugh hearings were not a criminal trial, they were the equivalent of a "job interview." There can be an equivalent investigation into these allegations against Christian Porter.
NY AG Tish James says she presented the strongest possible case against the cops who killed Daniel Prude to the grand jury, but the state's expert witness, Gary Vilke, has only ever testified for law enforcement and concluded that they acted lawfully. 9news.com/article/news/i…
This is Dr. Vilke under cross examination in the civil case regarding the police killing of Brandon Wroth in 2019.
In the killing of Daniel Prude, he concluded that Mr. Prude died due to "excited delirium." This is a diagnosis that is not recognized by the American Medical Association or American Psychiatric Association and is used to justify police violence against Black and Brown people.
I may get a lot of flak for mentioning this, but was chatting earlier with a friend about it:
How is it that in all the coverage of Tiger Woods, no one seemed to bring up his saying he was bothered when people called him African American and that he identified as Cablinasian?
It's relevant to his legacy. People can't be complicated now?
I mean I thought it was ridiculous to be talking about "his legacy" when he was alive, but that's what the coverage was and it was never mentioned.
I have represented Black people charged with felony leaving the scene of an accident when they have driven just a few blocks so they can safely stop their car, but the South Dakota AG actually killed someone, drove home and returned the next day, and is charged with misdemeanors?
The penalty for this charge in South Dakota is up to 2 years in prison.
I believe the conduct here in fact makes out a charge of manslaughter.
Joseph Boever, the person Attorney General Ravnsborg killed, was carrying a flashlight, which detectives themselves said would have been like “a beacon of light” in the dark night. washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/02…