Where is the evidence that this works? Even the trial design looks problematic looking at the limited data available about primary outcomes and why are events like this held for a questionable drug?
Why are we constantly becoming the laughing stock as a nation? @PrinSciAdvGoI
It is good that DRDO is working on something but that itself is not a proof of efficacy. Why don't we wait until the results are published in a peer reviewed journal?
Why this premature celebration of a drug with no clinically significant evidence that it is helpful?
Now that a false hope is created by all these drama you will see desperate relatives searching for the drug just like what's happening with other useless drugs and black marketing
Anyone doubting the DRDO drug is an 'anti-national' narrative has already started doing rounds.
A vaccine or a drug does not automatically become safe just because it was produced or manufactured in a particular country.
A vaccine or a drug should not be given special exemptions from rigourous testing just because it was produced or manufactured in a particular country.
Transparency, honesty and clarity about the trials/study are of paramount importance when it comes to science communication and dissemination of scientific information to general public.
Something that's clearly lacking from the press releases and statements of ICMR/Indian Govt
Are vaccines generally safe? YES
Would I take the vaccine even if it is in phase 2/3 clinical trial phase if I'm informed so? YES
Am I OK with misrepresentation of multiple facts? Absolutely NO.
Honesty and admitting the unknown should be the basis of good science.
When you find a doctor saying "i respect all systems of medicine" that just means he/she doesn't understand what evidence based medicine is. They may be genuinely humble, may have best of the intentions but unfortunately, most likely DO NOT understand the scientific methodology!
Humility is indeed great. But when humility, unintentionally is a result of not knowing what you don't know or not knowing something you are expected to know as a part of your profession which in turn gives unintentional promotion or platform to pseudoscience is a genuine concern
One fine example is the conversation between Sadhguru and Devi Shetty on 'systems of medicine'. Lack of understanding of scientific methodology and EBM is laid bare on this conversation multiple times.
If mere existence of a 'RCT' is the sole benchmark for calling something 'evidence', entirely ignoring the quality of the study then ANY treatment promoted by the pseudoscience lobby can be recommended by that logic. We can find a shoddy RCT somewhere!
No. We aren't against Yoga. Yoga sans all the woo, hype, mysticism, supernatural claims, and the accompanying pseudoscience would probably be good as a part of healthy lifestyle as exercise when done in 'reasonable limits'.
It is the 'cure for all' claims which we are against.
We are against the misrepresentations like these (in the study) claiming it to be superior to exercise somehow because it is 'yoga' you know?!
We are against being vague about definitions and trying to market it as some kind of magic cure or a secret science now being revealed!