Why would anyone get penile inversion surgery (SRS) if they weren't truly suffering?
"Cleaner and easier."
"Cleaner and easier."
Women are being told this is about compassion for those who are suffering. We are called derogatory names for pointing out the fetishizing of women's experiences.
The US @HRC released a guide called "Safer Sex for Trans Bodies" in 2016 which referred to female anatomy as a "front h*le."
What many didn't seem to realize is that this was defining female bodies with the "back h*le" as a reference point.
What many didn't seem to realize is that this was defining female bodies with the "back h*le" as a reference point.
Academic 'trans woman' Andrea Long Chu referred to the a**hole as a "universal v*gina" and presented this idea at various top universities, including Columbia, UC Berkeley, and Vassar, traditionally a women's university.
It's safe to assume "two an*ses" is a similar comparison of women's anatomy to what Long Chu so eloquently calls "b*tt stuff."
These are academics. They get prestige for putting these ideas out, and book contracts and payment.
These are academics. They get prestige for putting these ideas out, and book contracts and payment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
