If the threat of "armed insurrectionists" and "domestic terrorists" is as great as some claim, why do they have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it?
From fire extinguishes to massive Inauguration Day violence to a new March 4 uprising: fake hysteria reigns.
"Threats and dangers are not binary: they either exist or are fully illusory. They reside on a spectrum. To insist that they be discussed rationally, soberly and truthfully is not to deny the existence of the threat itself."
In all cases, dangers are inflated for nefarious ends.
It is no surprise that the rhetorical leaders now are the same lowlife neocon and Rovian slanderers — Bill Kristol, David Frum, Steve Schmidt, Nicolle Wallace, Rick Wilson — who demonized all who questioned the first War on Terror as traitors, terrorist-lovers and subversives.
Ultimately, if this “armed insurrection” and threat of domestic terrorism are so grave, why do media figures and politicians in both parties — from Adam Schiff to Liz Cheney — keep lying about it and peddling fictions?
The Biden WH told NYT that they withdrew Neera's nomination because Murkowski "made clear to the White House she would not vote for her."
Murkowski denies any such thing happened, saying the WH never even asker her what she intended to do.
Someone isn't telling the truth.
Before the nomination was pulled, @ryangrim made a very good case that people were wrong for saying the WH was fighting harder for Neera than $15/hr minimum wage (I was one of those).
That the U.S. opposes tyranny is a glaring myth. Yet it is not only believed but often used to justify wars, bombing campaigns, sanctions, and protracted conflict.
The U.S. does not dislike autocratic and repressive governments. It loves them, and it has for decades.
It is in situations like this -- where U.S. actions so glaringly diverge from the propaganda they typically peddle -- that they are forced to tell the truth about their actions. That's why Psaki admitted they do embrace murderous tyrants when "U.S. interests" are served:
Someone should ask @PressSec her own question verbatim about Biden’s Syria bombing at tomorrow’s briefing (and while the context of her tweet was Trump’s bombing of Syrian forces, the question still applies):
Some really fascinating findings in this big new Gallup survey on Americans identifying as "LGBT." It should lead to lots of deeper investigation to understand what explains some of these astronomical changes, but for now, a few points to note:
There's been a huge explosion in the number of Americans identifying as LGBT. Close to 1 out of every 5 Gen Z so identifies (17%). That's more than a 4-fold increase from Gen X (4%).
But almost all of the increase comes from those identifying as bi or trans, not gay or lesbian:
Of Americans now claiming "bi" identity, the vast majority of them in long-term relationships are in opposite-sex relationships (33%) rather than same-sex ones (3.7%).
So 10 times more people who identify as "bi" live in hetero-appearing relationships than gay/lesbian ones:
Just days after targeting social media CEOs to demand more online censorship of their adversaries, House Democrats are now coercing cable providers to remove disfavored cable outlets, including Fox News.
A clear priority of the new majority party is systemic censorship.
Democrats' justification for silencing their adversaries online and in media -- "they are spreading fake news and inciting extremism" -- is what despots everywhere say.
From Egypt and Jordan to Russia and China, these are the same accusations used to censor speech globally.
PolitiFact finally acknowledges the truth: nobody has any idea how Brian Sicknick died. His mother said he was never hit and believes he died of a stroke. His brother thinks it may have been pepper spray. Nobody knows:
Have any of the cable hosts who repeatedly dramatized a false story about how Sicknick died -- causing that story to ricochet across social media to millions of people -- retracted what they said, including @maddow & @andersoncooper?