Thread by @csranga

India was already "partly free" from the day majority community lost their Art 26 rights that existed on 26th Jan 1950 due to "pecularism" practiced for seven decades post Independence.
scroll.in/latest/988718/…

I would add to Govt rebuttal
1. Hindu Deities lost fundamental rights due to SC judgement.
2. Herculean unsuccessful efforts to reclaim Hindu Deity Rights vs ease w which Prince of Arcot could protect his rights during current Govt tenue shows there is no danger to "pecularism"

The independence of SC is very much intact such large scale protests of devotees for loss of fundamental rights of their Deity had minimal impact the question of fundamental rights of Hindu Deities is not even part of Qs framed by SC Nine Judge Bench

https://twitter.com/i/status/1077948696380137472

While Independent SC upheld claim Lord Shri Rama Deity through Ayodhya Judgement it simultaneously put a major road block for reclaim of several thousands of demolished ancient temples it's great wonder why this aspect is not highlighted at all when considering independence of SC

Any independent observer would wonder why Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji's Govt is considered favoring Hindus when even though Govt was formed due to support of Hindu Deities, Deities have been working through constitutional means to reclaim their rights without any favor from Govt.

The fact is that Dept of Legal affairs which worked at jet speed to protect rights of Prince of Arcot is working at snail's pace even after Hindu Deities have produced a favorable opinion on their fundamental rights from Justice Siva Sankara Rao proves that there is no favoritism

@threadreaderapp unroll