Berlin Conference of 1884
A Historical Thread
The Berlin Conference was described by Harm J. de Bli in "Geography: Realms, Regions, and Concepts:"
"Berlin Conference was Africa's undoing in more ways than one. Colonial powers superimposed their domains on the African continent.
By the time independence returned to Africa in 1950, the realm had acquired a legacy of political fragmentation that could neither be eliminated nor made to operate satisfactorily."
Purpose of the Berlin Conference:
In 1884, at the request of Portugal, German chancellor Otto von Bismark called together the major western powers of the world to negotiate questions and end confusion over the control of Africa.
Bismark appreciated the opportunity to expand Germany's sphere of influence over Africa and hoped to force Germany's rivals to struggle with one another for territory.
At the time of the conference, 80 percent of Africa remained under traditional and local control.
What ultimately resulted was a hodgepodge of geometric boundaries that divided Africa into 50 irregular countries. This new map of the continent was superimposed over 1,000 indigenous cultures and regions of Africa.
The new countries lacked rhyme or reason and divided coherent groups of people and merged together disparate groups who really did not get along.
Fourteen countries were represented by a plethora of ambassadors when the conference opened in Berlin on November 15, 1884.
The countries represented at the time included Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden-Norway (unified from 1814 to 1905), Turkey, and the United States of America.
Of these 14 nations, France, Germany, Great Britain, and Portugal were the major players in the conference, controlling most of colonial Africa at the time.
Berlin Conference Tasks:
The initial task of the conference was to agree that the Congo River and Niger River mouths and basins would be considered neutral and open to trade. Despite its neutrality, part of the Congo Basin became a personal kingdom for Belgium's King Leopold II.
Under his rule, over half of the region's population died.
At the time of the conference, only the coastal areas of Africa were colonized by the European powers. At the Berlin Conference, the European colonial powers scrambled to gain control over the interior of the continent.
The conference lasted until February 26, 1885 — a three-month period where colonial powers haggled over geometric boundaries in the interior of the continent, disregarding the cultural and linguistic boundaries already established by the indigenous African population.
Following the conference, the give and take continued. By 1914, the conference participants had fully divided Africa among themselves into 50 countries.
Major colonial holdings included:
Great Britain desired a Cape-to-Cairo collection of colonies and almost succeeded through their control of Egypt, Sudan (Anglo-Egyptian Sudan), Uganda, Kenya (British East Africa), South Africa, and Zambia, Zimbabwe (Rhodesia), and Botswana.
The British also controlled Nigeria and Ghana (Gold Coast).
France took much of western Africa, from Mauritania to Chad (French West Africa), as well as Gabon and the Republic of Congo (French Equatorial Africa).
Belgium and King Leopold II controlled the Democratic Republic of Congo (Belgian Congo).
Portugal took Mozambique in the east and Angola in the west.
Italy's holdings were Somalia (Italian Somaliland) and a portion of Ethiopia.
Germany took Namibia (German Southwest Africa) and Tanzania (German East Africa).
Spain claimed the smallest territory, which was Equatorial Guinea (Rio Muni).
The Berlin Conference did not initiate European colonization of Africa, but it did legitimate and formalize the process. In addition, it sparked new interest in Africa.
Following the close of the conference, European powers expanded their claims in Africa such that by 1900, European states had claimed nearly 90 percent of African territory.
#BerlinConference
#ScrambleForAfrica
#historyteacher

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Olaudah Equiano®

Olaudah Equiano® Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealOlaudah

7 Mar
No region in Southern Nigeria needs One Nigeria to survive.
(A must read.)

The problem is that mental laziness on the part of the people who have been running the country like a conquered territory.
Those who understand the principles of agenda-setting theory will see the goals in the face-off between the South West and Fulani North.
It was the birth of a new order, where the wings of a bunch of 'see no evil, say no evil politicians' were clipped.
Agenda setting, keeping a topic on the front page to underscore its importance, in this instance, the herders' crisis.
While the South West and the rest of the South East, South-South and North Central see the herders crisis as a threat to their existence, the Core North see it..
Read 54 tweets
6 Mar
Tommorow we shall examine the 1966 anti-Igbo pogrom, in continuation of our history lecture series. Please turn on my notifications and stay alert for this.
1966 anti-Igbo pogrom

The 1966 anti-Igbo pogrom was a series of massacres committed against Igbo people and other people of southern Nigerian origin living in northern Nigeria starting in May 1966 and reaching a peak after 29 September 1966.
Over 30,000 Igbos and other easterners have been estimated to have been killed. A further 1 million Igbos fled the Northern Region into the Eastern region. in response to the killings some northerners were massacred in Port Harcourt and other eastern cities in retaliation.
Read 28 tweets
23 Feb
Some people saw through President Muhammadu Buhari way back in 2014 by examining his days as Chairman of the Presidential Task Force (PTF) under the government of Gen Sani Abacha. While others were shouting 'Change', these eggheads warned Nigerians of the dangers in electing him.
I went through my archival library and saw this beautiful post on Nairaland.com on the days of Buhari as PTF Chairman and a write-up warning Nigerians that he wasn't as puritan as the agents of CHANGE made him out to be.
Come with me on this journey of rediscovery. This article is point blank and so prophetic. If only Nigerians believed this...
Read 44 tweets
21 Feb
THE GREEN RIVER KILLER.
A Historical Thread
Investigation Discovery presents ‘The Green River Killer: Mind of a Monster.’ The series takes a look at the notorious serious killer Gary Ridgway, whose crimes had terrorized the state of Washington after bodies, mostly of sex workers,
were discovered near the Green River. With the help of spine chilling tapes and interviews between authorities and the criminal, the show looks at the evil that was already lurking in the corners of his mind, and how it translated to real life.
Who is Gary Ridgway?
Gary was born on February 18, 1949, in Salt Lake City, Utah. His parents were Thomas and Mary Ridgway, and he was the middle child. His home life was not a great one, and his parents argued constantly.
Read 18 tweets
20 Feb
Why Thomas Sankara was not liked by some of his contemporary African leaders:

Maybe it has been the inability to overcome the truncation of life to see him and verve that fed hope of a better Burkina Faso – a better Africa, largely – but Thomas Sankara continues...
to be regarded as one of the most worthwhile examples of pro-people leadership more than 30 years after his death.
He died a few months to his 37th birthday. We console ourselves with the adage that the gods take away young the mortals they love but fate owes us no justification
for how it unfolds. However, in Sankara’s particular case, we may attune ourselves to the idea that Sankara was loved by another world because right where we live, the young soldier was not liked by some other African leaders.
Read 18 tweets
17 Feb
Match Group will buy social networking company Hyperconnect for $ 1.73 billion.
Match Group, which also owns popular dating apps Tinder and Hinge, today announced that they will buy social networking company Hyperconnect for a joint cash and stock deal.
HyperConnect, revenue which, according to forecasts, in 2020 will be $ 200 million (50% more than in 2019), consists of two applications - Azar and Hakuna Live, that allows users to connect through language barriers. These two directions complement each other:
Azar focuses on one-to-one video chats, and Hakuna Live focuses on the online streaming market. 75% of Hyperconnect's revenue comes from Asia. The company has created the “first mobile version” of a well-developed standard that is designed to provide resilient peer-to-peer...
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!