@macrocephalopod Hmmm. I’m sure this won’t shock you, but I’m going to respectfully disagree...1st, I hope we can agree that there are major structural components to how this elaborate machine operates. Throwing your hands up & claiming that they don’t matter, or that they are too complicated to
@macrocephalopod 2/x Measure or too small to separate from the noise, is simply not true. Clearly we don’t know all of the components of the machine. Clearly we can’t measure perfectly even all the components that we do know. Think of it as 1700’s medicine. That doesn’t mean, doctors are Quacks
@macrocephalopod 3/ during this time. Incomplete info when dealing w/ a complicated machine can lead to dangerous conclusions & incorrect treatments. But your odds of survival at the time from seeing a doc was still dramatically better than w/out. Flows are the life🩸of the system. By definition
@macrocephalopod 4/ they cause supply/demand. And the Reflexivity of current positioning is the largest factoR in driving these flows. U can understand and measure the largest components here, &!you can significantly shift the probability distributions in your favor, if you can do this well. It
@macrocephalopod 5/ is surely a very imperfect science, but to be clear it is a science to the trained mechanic, with objective measurements and results. I think it is cynical to claim that anyone that might be educating about the machine must be a charlatan, for if it
@macrocephalopod 6/6 were a doc back then, I ask u, that had expanded knowledge of a system of the body, would you have judged them as a fraud b/c they didn’t keep the info to themselves to profit in their own clinic?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
