1/ If you need proof that racism harms white folk too, just consider the trajectory of COVID deaths and what it tells us...
2/ In April of 2020 when whites had only been 30% of C19 deaths, and headlines announced disproportionate Black death rates, the administration and the right demanded opening everything back up, ending lockdowns, etc...
3/ Coincidence? Of course not. If the data had shown disproportionate white death (or wealthy death, or younger folks dying or healthier folks), no way are people clamoring for "getting back to normal" or showing up at rallies with guns and camo, screaming about 'tyranny...'
4/ But racism, classism, ageism and ableism combined to basically shrug off the deaths of those being most affected. Likewise, it was seen as a "blue state/big city" problem (read, also POC and liberal white people), so screw em, basically...
5/ Now, fast forward to late summer, after months of backlash to social distancing and lockdowns, led by right wing white folks. In August, 45% of deaths are white. By September it's 54%. October, 59%...
6/ By now, it's hanging around 55% each month. So all that nonchalance, which is directly related to the indifference to those who were being so visibly hit early on, led to the kind of asinine carelessness that has now claimed hundreds of thousands of white lives too...
7/ This is why folks insist we say Black Lives Matter...because when they do, all lives really will. Until then, it's a crap shoot. That psychological wage of whiteness might feel good. But I sorta doubt they'll let ya pay the hospital bill, or for grandma's funeral, with it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ If you bash cancel culture & scream about free speech but support states/school districts banning material they deem influenced by Critical Race Theory (or really anything that says racism has been a central feature of U.S. history--an inarguable truth btw), you're a fraud...
2/ A committee in NH just passed out a bill to do this. One proponent of the bill cited a lecture of mine being used in some classes as the reason why. What was the offending material that hurt this snowflake's feelings so much? Let's see. He cites three points in the lecture...
3/ First, he was mad bc I said, "Rich white people telling working-class white people that their enemies are Black and Brown...That's the whole history of America." Well, it's true. That's been a constant since the colonies...
There is a stunning lack of analytical sophistication among much of left Twitter, which causes their loudest voices to grossly overstate support for progressive/left policies. As someone who supports those policies it pains me to say this but it's true...
A THREAD
2/ These folks excitedly point to survey data showing broad support for M4A, for instance, or other left priorities & say "see, the people are with us!" and thus, the reason we don't get those things passed is "big Pharma money" or other corporate money buys off the lawmakers...
3/ This is incredibly simplistic on multiple levels. First, NO lawmakers would actually vote against what the people in THEIR district supported if they believed those people were actually going to vote, money be damned. They wouldn't commit political suicide for PAC money FFS...
That any conservatives would today praise MLK is evidence of the failure of our school system to teach him accurately, or the utter venality of those conservatives. Not ONE movement conservative supported King while he was alive. They detested him...
(a brief thread)
2/ The National Review — the main organ of the movement — condemned the civil rights movement he led and actually claimed “crazed Negroes” might have bombed the 16th St Baptist church in B’ham themselves, just to cast aspersions on sweet little segregationist whites...
3/ No conservatives or right wingers marched with him. And please, don’t say “but Charlton Heston!” That was actually when Heston was a liberal, so...
1/ I’m not one for ‘told ya so’s but in 1989 when David Duke won the state House seat in Louisiana, some of us said this was an inflection point in American politics. This wasn’t just the logical result of Reaganesque racial dog whistling. It was something different (a thread)...
2/ It wasn’t even George Wallace, strictly speaking, though it was closer to that than Reagan. It was the blatant introduction of racist appeals under the guise of mainstream conservatism, and w/a polish and media-savvy Wallace lacked, as had most previous white supremacists...
3/ Duke knew how to use media. He cut 30 minute infomercials in his Senate run in 1990 — unheard of at the time — to slowly lay out his politics of racial resentment, knowing it would find a home w/white folks angered by previous GOP scapegoating of welfare, etc..
1/ A few thoughts re: the increasingly accepted (and somewhat obvious) wisdom that "if the people who stormed the capitol had been Black they'd have been beaten or shot." This is true, so far as it goes, but too simple, in a way that MINIMIZES the power of whiteness in America...
2/ Don't misunderstand, I'm glad whenever white folks begin to see this kind of thing, and we all start somewhere. But there are at least 3 levels at which leaving it with the above argument minimizes the issue of systemic white supremacy (not just privilege)...
3/ First, to say "if they'd been black they'd have been beaten or shot," ignores a key element of white supremacy: the mentality of white entitlement, which led them to think they could do what they did w/o consequence in the first place...
It's not the MAGA mob's whiteness alone that explains why they weren't shot, beaten or arrested en masse. It's bc their rage seeks to reinforce the SYSTEM of whiteness, which they see threatened by Trump's defeat. If they were leftists or antiracists, they'd have been brutalized.
The bigger issue is the way law enforcement responds to people based on whether they are fighting to upend traditional hierarchy and injustice or reinforce and maintain it. If it's the latter, no problem. The former, all bets are off.
This means, typically, that Black and brown folks -- more likely to be protesting existing hierarchy and systems of domination -- will get the brunt of the abuse not merely for being Black and brown but for fighting white supremacy...