If you think about it, the idea of heaven sounds pretty grifty
"Sure, you'll get your reward if you do what i say, but you get it after you die."
"I should add, that if you don't do what i say, after you die you will be tortured for all eternity. I know that sounds extreme, but I don't make the rules. So, do you feel lucky, punk?"
In my school, they tried to puff up heaven by saying that in heaven you learn Torah all day. And I'm like, wait, no math? no gym, recess? Heaven is this class for all eternity?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Shapiro

Scott Shapiro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scottjshapiro

8 Mar
This Meghan interview is explosive. Wow. Just wow.
Meghan didn’t make Kate cry. Kate made Meghan cry.
Meghan was not pridefully holding her baby bump.
Read 64 tweets
5 Mar
Speaking of cancellation, the first article that I wrote with @oonahathaway was on "cancellation" in international law, what we call "outcasting." We argued there that in contrast to domestic law, where centralized institutions do things to scofflaws, /1
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
in international law states enforce the rules by refusing to do things with scofflaws. State outcast scofflaw states by depriving them of the benefits of cooperation. There are many forms of outcasting: if you look for them in international law, they are everywhere /2
In our book, "The Internationalists," Oona and I argued that outcasting is norm in the modern world because war has been outlawed. In the pre-1928 world, war was the way in which legal rights were enforced. Economic sanctions were illegal. This flips after 1928. /3
Read 4 tweets
30 Jan
I make jokes about inclusive legal positivism, so an explainer about what it is and why it's ridiculous

Thread /1
Legal positivism is the view that the law is ultimately a matter of social fact. Law is, at bottom, a social construction. In its modern form, the social facts that ultimately make rules *legal* rules is the practice among officials to treat those rules as law. /2
HLA Hart, the great legal positivist of postwar Anglophone jurisprudence called this practice the "rule of recognition" (RoR). The RoR identifies those properties that rules must possess in order to be law. The RoR in the US, for example, requires statutes /3
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!