Do you ever get the impression that when Johnson decides on cabinet members he asks if they have any experience and the response is:

Well gosh! No! But I'm willing to give it a bash!
The cabinet of government should be treated like the board of a multi-national company (no! not filled with cronnies) in my view along the lines of some advice a good friend of mine (who is CEO of a multi-national) once told me.
He said to me, that the job of a CEO is not to know everything about the company. It is to be a generalist and look at the big picture. This is why there are other directors. It is the job of directors to be specialised in the departments they oversee and then give...
EXPERT advice to the CEO which he can act on. And it's the next thing he said to me that has always stuck with me. He said, "It is the job of a CEO to make sure he's the dumbest person in the room".
Obviously, he clarified that statement. What he didn't mean, which seems to be what Boris Johnson does, is that the CEO should be dumb or act dumb for the purposes of later pleading ignorance. What he meant was, that the CEO should ensure the directors below him are...
way smarter than he or she is, with respect to their specific field, and that in comparison, a CEO should himself, or herself feel dumb compared to the level of their subordinates, of knowledge in their given field.
The CEO is supposed to be an intelligent generalist. The subordinates on the board are meant to be extremely intelligent specialists - the same logic should be applied to government cabinets. Unfortunately not the case in the UK Government. It's like dumb and dumber.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2

Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJKeatings

8 Mar
I'm just going to point out that with both leaders of both pro-indy parties now confirming legal challenge of the referendum bill by Westminster is likely if its constitutionality without a section 30 order remain in doubt; and testing that in court being, in Patrick Harvie's...
...own words "a perfectly legitimate approach to take". - Why then has no politician put their neck on the line to test it - because this mere pleb has - taking a year of abuse I might add AND facing financial ruin to do it.
I really don't think I am out of line to say that parliamentarians are missing something - a spine!
Read 6 tweets
8 Mar
Good Morning Scotland! Good Morning World! Good Morning GCHQ! We start today with an article about the greens which simultaneously made my left eye twitch and also ended up me pebble dashing my PC monitor with my cup of tea. Thread 👇
In the national @patrickharvie said this: Image
For the eagle-eyed 10,000 backers of the #PeoplesAS30, your eyelid may also now be twitching. "We'll test the matter in court" to "legislate without a section 30"...... This is literally the point of the Peoples Action - to establish that it is legal for Holyrood to legislate...
Read 10 tweets
7 Mar
Something I am seeing with regularity now is "I'm voting SNP 1/2 in the hope that they MIGHT get a majority". This statement genuinely knocks the wind out of me, and let me be clear, I am not criticising the people saying it. I'm criticising the PR guys at the SNP for...
...perpetuating the myth when they know that SNP1/2 just does not work.

And many will say: "but martin, the reason the SNP lost a majority in 2016 was that people didn't all vote SNP in both lists"...and that I am afraid to say is also false.
The reason the SNP didn't get a majority in 2016 was because of the 2014 referendum and because the ass has fallen out of labour in Scotland. (No! I am not kidding).
Read 35 tweets
5 Mar
For the second time in my life, I find myself having to choose between abandoning a case or to turn and fight. This case, however, has much higher stakes. My life. Unfortunately, it seems the counsel I had to hire in this case (on contingency) doesn't have the ability...
...to see it through. Being a carer, hiring a lawyer on retainer is a no-go, and the costs of doing so would far exceed the sum sought (which is the cost of a surgery which was denied due to discrimination - a mere £12K which would actually save the taxpayer hundreds...
...of thousands over the long run). Ergo, the choice I have to make is to fight it myself personally, vs Yet again, the full force of the public purse. Or to have a shortened lifespan. Not much of a choice here really.
Read 6 tweets
4 Mar
Current figures show that SNP likely to take Willie Rennies seat in constituency ballot in Mid-Scotland and Fife - this means SNP to be 10 times more penalised than the other parties (rather than 9 times more) than the other parties.
It does not matter which maths you use for Mid-Scotland and Fife, the SNP will get zero seats on the regional ballot. They get 120K votes and would need at least (with 9 seats in the constituency) 46000 extra votes just to get 1 regional list seat.
That goes up to nearly 60K extra votes for one single seat in Mid-Scotland and Fife if they also take rennies seat in the constituency.

So! It's almost a mathematical certainty that the 120K votes in the regional list in MSF will be entirely wasted.
Read 7 tweets
4 Mar
I note the 9 SNP supporters who have hit unfollow with respect to my disparaging remarks regarding the health secretary. Fair enough. But when you or one of your family members becomes a victim of said policy and it damages their health. Look back and remember -
You had the opportunity to actually call out a bad policy that allows such things to happen and you chose instead to turn away from it. That's on you, but I am through holding my words on this.
It would not be so bad, were it not for the fact that this is not an isolated incident. You only need look at the review sites of the SPSO and you will see how bad it is. It is therefore in the interests of your party to fix this deficient policy before it truly backfires.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!