Horrifying tale of how a public, open-source vaccine was ready in Finland nine months ago but got nowhere because Big Pharma was interested only in a patented vaccine it could make big private profits from jacobinmag.com/2021/02/finlan…
As the pandemic shows, governments heavily invest public money in research exploited by Big Pharma to patent drugs it then fleeces governments to buy. Those same governments indemnify Big Pharma against any liabilities. ‘Profits are private, risks are socialized’
The mad mantra of proft-driven medicine is: ‘Stopping a disease in its tracks is bad business.’ Corporate drug-makers are incentivised to avoid preventive and prophylactic medicine – and, of course, cures – so that they can keep raking in profits from the chronically ill
A profit-driven, patent system means most of the world's drugs factories currently lie idle, blocked from vaccine production by the US and EU. ‘The rich countries end up shooting themselves in the foot as the virus is allowed to keep spreading and mutating over most of the globe’
I recently explored how Big Pharma's profit-driven interest in keeping the public dependent on drugs has resulted in the stifling of research into the apparently powerful protective role of Vitamin D – the sunlight hormone jonathan-cook.net/blog/2021-02-2…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Guardian sacks a columnist – and indicates he should keep quiet – after he comments on US aid to Israel. Nathan J Robinson is surprised by his treatment, but others - myself included - were similarly forced out into the cold after criticising Israel currentaffairs.org/2021/02/how-th…
This goes back to at least Michael Adams, who got into trouble with the Guardian in 1967 for trying to report on Israel's covert ethnic cleansing of three Palestinian villages during that year's war. No one at the paper wanted those crimes covered coldtype.net/Assets.11/pdfs…
And in 2014 the Guardian axed Nafeez Ahmed's blog – violating his contract – after he wrote a viral piece about Israeli energy interests related to Gaza, an important but ignored topic. He wasn't accused of errors. He was told he'd strayed off topic jonathan-cook.net/blog/2014-12-0…
The Queen has an opaque, little-discussed prior consent power over legislation she secretly abused to give herself a unique right, decades ago, to conceal from the public the scale of her vast private wealth.
And where does the Queen's wealth hidden from the public come from? The public. Lots of Britain's common land has been seized over the centuries to enrich the monarchy. And today, the Queen reaps enormous farming subsidies from UK taxpayers for the farmland she holds
The Queen and Prince Charles have vetted at least eight parliamentary bills relating to their own agricultural interests – the latest only weeks ago. What changes were secretly made to those laws as a result we may not know for many decades dumptheguardian.com/uk-news/2021/f…
Patrick Eller, a longtime digital forensics investigator for the US army, demolishes US claims that Assange helped Chelsea Manning 'hack' military documents, in the latest report of the extradition hearings from ex-ambassador Craig Murray craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/…
Eller testifies that there is no forensic evidence that Manning's online interlocutor, ‘Nathaniel Frank’, was Assange; and anyway Manning had not needed help from ‘Frank’ either to download the classified documents or to cover her tracks
Further, Eller tells the Assange gearing, there was no way in 2010 to crack the ‘hash key’ Manning sought help cracking.
To top it all, these points were known long ago to US prosecutors because they had come to light earlier in Manning's own trial
The Guardian finally breaks its silence to offer a cursory summary of Assange's extradition hearing. It tried to bury the fact it was responsible for disclosing a password that forced the publication of unredacted cables, as I explained in a post this week jonathan-cook.net/blog/2020-09-2…
The Guardian's denial is riddled with deceptions. Leigh retrospectively *claims* Assange said the password was temporary. Even in the highly unlikely event that's true, publication very obviously compromised the formula used for all passwords protecting Wikileaks' encrypted files
And the very obvious reason Assange did not – could not – express 'concern' about the Guardian's disclosure was because to do so would have drawn attention to the fact that the password was public. Instead Assange was forced into a behind-the-scenes damage limitation operation
When lawyers for the US yet again quote from a book by the Guardian's David Leigh in a desperate bid to bolster their flimsy case against Julian Assange, investigative journalist Nicky Hager replies: 'I would not regard that [book] as a reliable source' craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/…
Nicky Hager is the latest journalist to strenuously deny criticisms of Assange made by David Leigh and Luke Harding in their book. Assange was committed to redacting names before publication, says Hager. He attributes the criticism instead to Guardian 'animosity' towards Assange
Ex-ambassador Craig Murray points out that the ‘bad blood’ between the Guardian and Assange related not to redaction issues, as Leigh claims in his book, but the fact that Assange refused to give the Guardian rights to a biography, which they hoped would be a big money-spinner
Here's one reason the Guardian is so quiet on the Assange show trial. The US is citing comments by two of its discredited reporters: David Leigh, who divulged a vital Wikileaks password; and Luke Harding, who was outed *fabricating* a story to suggest Assange colluded with Russia
Luke Harding has been shielded by the Guardian from any consequences for his entirely made-up story about Assange meeting a Trump aide and unnamed "Russians" while confined to the Ecuadorian embassy theintercept.com/2019/01/02/fiv…