Do you have sympathy for Harry and Meghan (29% yes, 56% no) has a starker generational divide than just about any other issue that I can think of.
18-24: 59% yes, 20% no (+39)
65+: 13% yes, 79% no (-66)
YouGov do not report breaks by ethnicity on this issue. It is definitely a weakness (in 2021) when questions are asked of perceptions of racism without any breaks by ethnicity.
Republicanism has scored just under 1/5 in almost every poll for the half century since it was first polled in 1969. But the institution's long-term challenge is to retain support across generations.
I wrote about the extraordinary stability of attitudes to the Monarchy for the New Statesman back in 2012. (Support for a Republic was 18% in 1969, 18% in 1993, 19% in 2002, 18% in 2007, 18% in 2011). Now appears to be about 17% in 2021. newstatesman.com/blogs/the-stag…
The generational divide might lead us to anticipate that print media & online media would have a different balance of coverage.
Share of voice of the under-24s in our media discourse is quite narrow. (And major broadcasters are currently struggling to reach this audience)
Various potential contributory factors, eg
- Lower engagement/more agnostic about Monarchy
- Less engagement with print media
- Different attitudes to race/shifting perceptions of what racism is
- Correlation with other generation shifts? (education, gender views, mental health)
For comparison, this was the Brexit referendum by age (according to Lord Ashcroft's referendum day poll on 23/6/16)
58% of women and 44% of men are in the 51% of people who told Ipsos-Mori they were very/fairly interested in news about the British Royal family ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-…
It's interesting that is a similar-ish broadly inverse gender profile to interest in football (the national team). These may perhaps be alternative national soap operas.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Few people in the media (if anybody) thinks there is a uniform picture across all outlets. The tone of this statement is uninterested in any dialogue or nuance about gaps or challenges that remain, as they obviously do.
3 years ago, the editor of the Daily Express, Gary Jones, made a clear statement about why he was uncomfortable with the paper's headlines about Muslims. There have been some changes since. The tone of Society of Editors sounded oblivious to any issues google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theg…
Free Speech Union stated that it will take no view on the content of the speech that people make using their free speech. It simply defends their exercise of free speech. (But this principle is applied selectively when it does take such a view about the content, as it often does)
My view is that their claim to take no position on the content of speech is both incoherent in principle and impossible in practice. But it is their stated position.
BSA long-term data shows attitudes to gender were socially polarising in mid-late 1980s. However, previous splits by generation & gender over one of the foundational claims pursued by feminism was replaced by broad social convergence in favour by this century.
Mystery in the pattern. Why might this change seem to become much stronger during Thatcher's third term (1987-90) yet having apparently seemed to somewhat weakened during her second term (1983-87)? But we don't have pre-1979 data from this source as BSA starts in the 1980s.
In fact, the second poll to show independence behind. This wiki page has a summary of polls since the 2014 referendum, as well as before en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_p…