A few quibbles, but this is helpful grid to understanding how different facets of (conservative) evangelicalism respond to cultural challenges. Still, it's essential to recognize that each is a *response.* What would it look like for the church to lead in cultural formation?
1) where we are 2) where we need to be and 3) ethical ways to get there.
But I wonder if the biggest cultural challenge evangelicals face is simply a failure of imagination.
A significant part of the division we face is b/c the questions themselves are unresolvable w/in modern, contemporary paradigms. We are at an impasse, a dead end, not simply b/c we don't understand each other but b/c our resources & imagination are limited.
We are too busy responding to the established narrative instead of challenging & changing it. We are operating in flawed paradigms & we're stuck in them.
The way forward must involve questioning the paradigms that have been delivered to us. Asking how all of us--conservative & progressive alike--have been trapped in unwinnable, unresolvable debates.
In a conversation yesterday, I remarked that Christianity is a kind of parallel universe that's breaking into our own. Christ's Kingdom is way of thinking & imagining. It is not fundamentally reactionary. It is not simply a response to the kingdoms of the world.
Part of our calling as Christians is to imagine a better way. To be creative & forward thinking & embody the realities of heaven here on earth. We're not aiming at utopia. But we do have deep resources of imagination, hope, grace, & abundance that our world desperately needs.
We are of little good to anyone if we simply respond to the culture as it exists & operate w/in its established paradigms. Our job is to break the paradigms. To proclaim new & better ways of being.
But to do this, we must know these ways ourselves. We must understand the deeper magic. We must have our imaginations cultivated by first principles. We must recover an understanding of faith & gospel that goes beyond our cultural iterations of it.
B/c part of reclaiming & cultivating Christian imagination means recognizing the degree to which *our* own thinking has been shaped by cultural categories. We must understand that both left & right are swimming in the same polluted stream. Even if in opposite directions.
I'm convinced that the only way forward in these "hot button" issues is through recovery of first principles & cultivating prophetic imagination. An imagination that can look beyond what *is* to what should & could be.
Certainly we must deal with the realities of this moment. We must see things for what they are & speak truthfully about them. But we do this in order to move toward true goodness.
As long as our goal is to respond to cultural challenges, we will be forever locked in debates b/c the paradigms delivered to us are unsolvable. (Which is why we resort to force & dominance to "win.") But what if we could reframe the Qs? What if we could imagine a better way?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rt. 40 runs thru my home county in PA & is called the National Road b/c by some definitions, it's the oldest highway in the US, built to facilitate trade & travel w/ the frontier. About 30 minutes from my parents' home, it runs thru a small mountain community called Farmington.
Today, on one side of Rt. 40, you will find New Meadow Run, a community of the Bruderhof, an intentional Christian community of shared work, fellowship, life, & faith.
Opposite New Meadow Run, immediately on the other side of the road, you will find Nemicolan Woodlands, an uber-lux "playground" of the rich that includes hotels, a spa, casino, golf course, & polo fields.
I'll always advocate for knowing one's God-given limits, learning to say no, honoring the needs of body & spirit, but I'm increasingly convinced that self-care is a frame of radical individualism & can never replace community's responsibility to care for each member.
In this sense, self-care is a coping mechanism that happens when communities collapse. It's a necessary, but poor, substitute for the care we should receive from others.
There is a direct line btwn how a man treats the women around him and how he treats the Church.
A lot of folks are struggling to make sense of leaders who use their positions of authority to abuse women. They can't figure out how a person could be committed to ministry & do such things.
Let me suggest that such a person was never committed to Christ's Bride.
More likely, such a man was using the Church the exact same way they were using the women they abused.
As another scandal comes to light, we need to remember that the problem isn't simply that *women* aren't on boards or in places to offer accountability. It's that men & women who lack virtue are sitting in seats where good men & women should be.
Healthy communities require at least 2 things: interdepence & virtue.
1) Yes, both men & women are necessary. Our corresponding gifts & life experiences are designed to work together b/c even at our best, we're limited & need each other.
2) But both men & women must be virtuous. I've lived long enough to know that both men & women will happily cover up & minimize scandal for their own ends. They'll do it in different ways, but they'll both do it.
It's the perfect combination of deep affection for a place, love of people & all their foibles, & respect for the natural world.
I know other folks might have higher ambitions, but I don't need to write the next great novel. I'd just want to write stories that honor place & people as much as All Creatures honors Yorkshire.