For those who insist that we're in some post-racial dream world, here's exhibit 1 - how visa office in Ghana requests the *exact* same documents requested by a visa office in the U.K.
London: if you do not send documents in time it could delay your application.
Ghana: we're going to throw a procedural fairness letter and a request letter together and warn you about s.16 IRPA right away. Note for non-immi folks: this is a way to fast-track a refusal + open up misrep. #cdnimm#racism
Also Ghana: you better answer truthfully or we will refuse you. The word 'refusal' shows up four times in the letter and 'truthful' twice.
Again for non-#cdnimm folks: can refuse a sponsorship on s.16 for not providing docs and s.40 for misrep. Usually a PFL sent IF concerns.
London: we're not only going to request these docs, but we're going to actually give you advice on how to fill it out properly. #cdnimm#racism
Ghana: you cannot email us. If you don't read instructions - we will refuse you. Side note: case specific enquiries/webforms can take several weeks to be received. They have severe file size limitations. Consistently, there is miscommunication around these docs. #cdnimm#racism
London - just email us back. No worries. (side note but not pictured - London returns emails/confirmations almost right away confirming documents received). The Officer gives their initials (i.e. who they are) and the correspondence is very cordial. #cdnimm#racism
Ghana - 30 days. We will decide with what we have. If you don't respond you will be refused. #cdnimm#racism
London: in case you missed it earlier. 30 days AND clear instructions that you can explain why you cannot provide a document. #cdnimm#racism
Imagine job interview process (or applying to an elite school): which I often compare immigration to. For one set of clients, you're given warm, welcoming, accommodating language. For another group, we tell you we're scrutinizing you, you'll be refused, don't lie. #cdnimm#racism
Been seeing this for yrs, but only started documenting this (w/ anti #racism lens I'm working to form). Reminded of many African clients I represented before developing this lens + how I just brushed this off as normal. Indeed, Gov's defense will be: more fraud in Africa. #cdnimm
We have a duty to ask about visa office 'training', 'standards.' To me this epitomizes anti-Black racism - discrimination based on geographical difference + race. A red carpet tarmac in UK; fences + gates in Africa. Result is folks are in fear + often w/o adequate representation.
In this tweet (which I hope doesn't need to have to become a report), I ask @CitImmCanada and @marcomendicino to invest resources into tackling anti-Black racism in #cdnimm and a strategy to combat these types of explicit (+many more implicit) racist actions underpinning system.
Also, because I know you are teaching a course on CRT right now Prof @JoshuaSealy and I think immigration as a vehicle for anti-Black racism is very much integral to both historical and current narratives.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting. We presented on the changes which seemed to suggest visitor record were not going to be issued to accompanying dependents of international students. Now it's changed again and frankly - it's back to the confusion on what helping to establish in Canada means. #cdnimm
CBSA instructions link in the PDIs is broken (cc: @CitImmCanada) but if it were linked correctly you need to go to this link as the actual questionnaire doesn't differentiate between international students/family of international student. travel.gc.ca/travel-covid/t…
In sum, those who are approved with study permits + are bringing accompanying spouse/dependent will get asked about their reason for travel (non-discretionary = help intl student 'establish' in Canada) + importantly demonstrate adequate funds for stay in Canada. #cdnimm#intled
BIPOC lawyer's dilemma (talked about this w/several in circle):
You see injustice/racism in work (place/society). Do you speak out/write/comment/show up?
Evaluate risk: Firm of WM/WW firm partners, be seen as not neutral/objective/activist/distracted/counter client interests.
Choice: You swallow your salty blood-tinged saliva. You make pro forma statement when asked by firm your thoughts in round table discussion. You message BIPOC friends in texts/messages expressing solidarity. You realize you have not shown up as authentic self within both spaces.
Yrs later you hope your historical silence but model minority advocacy (acting on positive stuff, diversity committees, feel good/back pat/raise up all work) gets you enough clout for you to be elevate to partner/get a judicial/board nomination or else focus on family.