1/ A thread covering a Teamed Program approach to establish a bedrock for restoring land vehicles expertise and supply to the Army in the 2030 onwards timeframe. Working title: Team Land Forces.
2/ Readers may recognise the success the MOD has had with Team Complex Weapons, the RAF with Team TEMPEST and the Royal Navy with the National Shipbuilding Strategy. The Army would benefit form a similar, coherent, vision.
3/ The MOD and Army requires current and future military capabilities with both Operational Advantage and Freedom of Action without supply chain hindrance.
4/ The UK defence industry requires a sustainable and profitable business and aims to be MoD’s supplier of choice for the supply and support of land vehicles.
5/ The Team would deliver Capabilities to the Army via an initial three broad Capability Groups - Regeneration(Tank) or REGEN(T). Armoured is inclusive of the Protected and Fighting terms, amongst others.
6/ AVRe Cap 1 - Existing Medium Weight Capability being introduced in the form of MIV, with continued Spiral Development.
7/ AVRe Cap 2 - A light family of wheeled and tracked vehicles.
8/ AVRe Cap 3 - A heavy family of tracked vehicles.
9/ AVRe Cap 4 - Individual personnel protection and equipment.
10/ Each AVRe Capability Group would be delivered with the following methods:
11/ Commonality: The development of solutions that satisfy multiple uses within each AVRe Capability
12/ Modularity: Sharing components and systems for solutions both within and between AVRe Capabilities.
13/ Stockpile reduction: Move from contract production to a responsive production line. Reduce initial pool size with lower volume, more frequent deliveries, selling off or scrapping the older vehicles as age and wear/damage accrues.
14/ Future planning: MOD and the Team collaborate on future planning and budget.
15/ Support savings: Leverage the Unified Support Environment model introduced with Team Complex Weapons and Team TEMPEST to deliver savings in through-life costs.
16/ Collaboration: Accommodate collaborative projects between Services or International Partners as a mechanism to provide savings. Savings are prioritised over export profit, though the latter is not precluded.
17/ Future threads will look at the initial AVRe Capability Groups that this Teamed Program approach, in the guise of Team Land Forces, could deliver using this proven and successful model.
1/ AVRe Cap 3 - A thread looking at an approach to regenerate a heavy family of tracked vehicles.
2/ Background
===========
3/ Challenger's origins date to 1977 when Chobham armour made its first appearance. Around the same time, Rolls-Royce developed a new engine to replace the shockingly under-powered and unreliable British Leyland motor in Chieftain. This was the foundation for a new MBT design.
MagTec are a UK company based near Sheffield. They are currently working with Supacat and others to deliver a Hybrid Electric Drive version of Jackal and Foxhound for demonstration.
They have form with the MOD...
1/
In between the MOD’s first dalliance with Boxer (MRAV) and FRES (Ajax) MagTec developed the Hybrid drive for the SEP.
But SEP wasn’t just tracked...
2/
MagTec also developed a 6x6 wheeled version of the Hybrid drive to fit the common hull.
Sustaining sovereign defence manufacture in context of UK defence is not about profit or ROI, though that's ok too. Its core is maintaining that critical mass for training the next cohort and maintaining both the theoretical and practical design/build/operate feedback loops.
Arguably, if sovereign defence manufacturers cannot sustain themselves with UK defence work, the MOD should be taking on an element of their functions and bringing them back in-house. Foreign kit and TTP's may not always fit our needs and that's a security issue in of itself.
We should be considering this in the likes of the IR directly and if cuts need to be made to accommodate it then this what to save - it is arguably more important to preserve an ability for long term design/regeneration when we are looking at having to cut back in the short term.
A fast and loose thread on the broad history for the *sensible* reason why Nimrod MRA.4 was scrapped.
WARNING: Nimrod MRA.4 is an emotive subject. There is a lot of genuinely good work, blood, sweat, tears and lost lives behind the Tweets. Tread sensitively please.
We'll skip to the point at which BAe's (not BAE's) proposal for Nimrod 2000 using Comet airframes had been accepted, but after the point at which tooling for new-build fuselages had been rejected in the 1990's.
There was a requirement for 21 aircraft to replace Nimrod MR.2 and without building new airframes as proposed there was a shopping trip to buy up all of the remaining Comet husks we could. Numbers vary, but we'll settle on 21 assumed complete kits plus bits for convenience.
A quick thread on the challenge the Army has in describing itself to decision makers and the public in order to secure funds for projects. A little tongue in cheek...
💬 “We need to replace an ageing squadron of aerothings. Our purchase will support our aerospace sector worth £34B in exports.”
- Royal Air Force
💬 “We require five warboats to replace our well worked vessels. We’ll need to place orders now though, for long lead items that warboats clearly need, such as radars, guns, rockety missiles and engines.”