If you watched the Meg & Harry doc, you may have been surprised to hear this name: @tylerperry

The man that offered his home to the pair has an incredible story of going from "poor as hell" to "billionaire"

How did he do it?

As Perry says, "ownership changes everything"

🧵...
1/ Who is Tyler Perry?

You might recognize him in few films, but his on-screen performances are only a piece of the puzzle.

He built his empire as a screenwriter, director, equity-holder, author, real estate mogul... the list goes on.

And he's made sure to own every step.
2/ Tyler's net worth is $1B.

He's one of only ~3k billionaires and was listed by Forbes as "the highest-paid man in entertainment"

Comparative net worth:
- Taylor Swift: $365m
- DiCaprio: $260m
- Serena Williams: $225m

So how did he outperform these household names?

Ownership
3/ As a kid, Tyler would watch his dad subcontract and make $800, while the owner sold it, netting $80k.

"I always knew that there was more power in the man that owned the house rather than the man actually working on building it. So I wanted to be the guy that owned the house."
4/ As a highschool dropout, Perry hustled.

He'd use left-behind badges to sneak into events. He sold cars. He was a bill collector.

In his "spare time", he wrote scripts, eventually saving $12k, enough to rent space at an Atlanta community theater.

The first of many bets.
5/ He used the space to launch his play, "I Know I’ve Been Changed"

An overnight success? The opposite.

He struggled to pay rent and lived out of his car for months.

But, Tyler kept investing in his creation.

He sold the tickets. He designed the set. He even sold the snacks.
6/ He continued producing for a DECADE+

The same play first garnering an empty theater would be forced to upscale to the acclaimed Fox Theatre.

Before even touching TV or film, Perry sold $100m+ in theater tickets, $20m in merch, plus $30m in videos of plays, bc he owned them!
7/ Tyler understood: if you don't have an audience, you have to create one. And that's what he did.

That very audience opened the doors to his first film, "Diary of a Mad Black Woman", the first in his Madea series.

But, he still had to strike a deal with a distributor.
8/ Not many were willing to take a risk of Perry's work. But Perry was willing to bet on himself.

He made a deal with Lionsgate's CEO.

Tyler would put up half of the money. But, he would also collect half of the profits.

Most importantly, he controlled and owned the content.
9/ Before the release, Lionsgate's CEO said, “If it makes us $20m [total] I’ll be very, very happy.”

Perry replied, "OK, great. $20m the first weekend?"

The film debuted at #1 in the US, making $22.7m in weekend 1, off a budget of $5.5m. It's since made $150m in licensing.
10/ With that success in hand, Tyler went to Hollywood in '06, with 10 full episodes of a TV series (House of Payne).

Network CW bought and aired the episodes, with ratings through the roof.

This caught the attention of a much larger network, looking to steal the deal from CW.
11/ He struck a deal with this network (TBS), that would air at least 90 more episodes.

They would pay him $200m to leave CW!

The kicker? He would own the episodes outright. AKA he retained ownership.

This deal is est. to have made Perry $138m alone.

His show, his earnings.
12/ While Hollywood ignored Perry's success, he continued to write, act, and produce the Madea movies w Lionsgate.

He focused on "first look" deals, meaning Tyler owned the copyright. More on this soon.

Over time, the 11-film franchise made >$1b in sales, netting him $290m+!
13/ In 2015, Tyler made another big bet.

He bought an unexpected plot of land (army base) in Atlanta for $30m.

He's since transformed the 330 acres into a rental space for production companies, more than double the size of Warner Bros' lot.

It's est. to be worth $280m today.
14/ Tyler's bet wasn't a fluke.

He knew Atlanta needed development, as a native there for 15y.

He also capitalized on Georgia's '08 tax incentives for production companies.

In 2007, $67m was spent on film production in the state. By 2018, that was $2.9B, much thanks to Perry.
15/ His land helped secure his recent $150m/y deal to create content for ViacomCBS (90 TV episodes), and to rerun his past library!

Again, which he can sell... bc he owned it. After 5 years, the rights return to him.

As you might guess, Perry secured an ownership stake in BET+.
16/ The best part for Perry: no non-compete.

That means he's able to rent his space to other productions, including well-known names like the Walking Dead or Black Panther.

In his own words: "I own the lights. I own the sets. Because I own everything, my returns are higher."
17/ What's the key lesson from Perry?

At every single juncture, Tyler made sure to bet on himself by prioritizing ownership vs short-term gain.

By the time he amassed 22 films, dozens of plays, and 1200 TV episodes, he owned his library of work.

Not many ppl can say the same.
18/ @tylerperry says it best:

"Ownership for me was easy because I was underestimated. They said, 'Sure, you can own it.' They didn't think it'd be worth anything."

Always bet on yourself. 🎯

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steph Smith

Steph Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stephsmithio

2 Mar
There's a lot of hype around NFTs and very little nuance around them.

I tend to see 2 arguments:

1. This is the future
2. This is worthless

The world is not black & white.

NFTs are not useless, nor are they that useful intrinsically. But so are many other things in life.

🧵
1/ Let's first agree on a definition:

NFTS are unique, digital assets. You may liken them to a trading card or art.

Scarcity is built into the asset, so is often worth more than its inherent utility.

In buying an NFT, you are betting that ppl will care about it in the future.
2/ Now let's address whether "NFTs are worthless"

NFTs = tech, allowing you to monetize & track ownership of the underlying asset.

Ex: An artist can sell X to A, but also get a cut when A sells that asset to B.

This tracking mechanism is worth something. How much? It depends.
Read 16 tweets
1 Mar
Companies often make $ in ways that you may not expect.

People learning that Robinhood monetizes via PFOF is just one case.

Decoding companies & their biz models equips you to build more creatively, with more tools in your toolbox.

A few examples... 🧵

1/ Amazon: they just sell stuff online, right?

Yes... and no. Their profit center is AWS, making 50%+ of all profits ($Bs) for the giant.

Another sneaky tidbit about AMZN: their advertising business outperformed Twitter's last decade in 2020 alone.

2/ Airlines just sell flights, right?

No. In fact, their mileage programs are worth billions.

An appraisal of the U.S. part of the AAdvantage program was between $19.5-$31.5B... MORE than American is worth, total.

Airlines used these programs to secure $Bs in pandemic loans.
Read 7 tweets
17 Feb
After covering numerous companies at Trends, I've noticed: people think of competition too narrowly.

This is indicative of not understanding the root problem being solved.

Competition != products w the same features
Competition = anything overlapping w core value provided

🧵
Ex 1: Quibi died quickly. Some blame it on COVID. Others on frivolous spending.

But their oversight was thinking that they were competing with Netflix or Disney Plus.

Their competition was Twitter, TikTok, or your #1 podcast. Free, on-demand entertainment.
Ex 2: Neflix has fared much better.

Why? They understand the complexity of their competition graph.

Reed Hastings has astutely noted that it's not just Disney+ or HBO. They also compete with... sleep.

Their goal is to get more of your overall entertainment timeshare.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!