X : Your four stages of evolution on your map ...
Me : ... genesis, custom built, product to commodity?
X : Yes. How do you know it's right?
Me : It's a model, it's wrong. It just happens to be the best model I have until someone finds a better model.
X : How long did it take you to come up with that axis?
Me : Roughly ... years of noodling (2003-05), several fortuitous accidents (2005), 6 months of 70hr+ weeks collecting data (2006-07), several nights of "what's the point, I'm broke" and years to grow confidence (2007 - now).
X : ... and it's wrong?
Me : Oh absolutely, it's a model. Maps are also imperfect by their nature in order to be useful. But then that's the point, I find it useful until a better model comes along.
X : Will a better model come along?
Me : I hope so as the field needs to evolve. I'm also acutely aware that I'll have inertia (due to past success, pre-existing capital) despite my focus on opening up the field and so I'll have to watch myself for that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An agile organisation is one that uses appropriate methods according to the context whether project management (i.e. XP to Lean to Six Sigma) or purchasing or team structures.
An organisation which uses "Agile" everywhere will never be an agile organisation.
X : What's your advice?
Me : On agile organisations?
X : Yes.
Me : Depends upon how much I like you.
X : Explain.
Me : If I like you then I'd say ... understand your context, use appropriate methods, go serverless, go finops and think principles.
X : If you don't?
Me : Write stories, go agile, go containers, go devops and re-organise to a spotify model.
X : Bimodal?
Me : I'm not cruel.
A staggering and unimaginable cost with no clear evidence of effectiveness ... afaik, that's common language in the private sector for projects run by ex McKinsey consultants.
Can we stop using the "NHS" moniker? This really should be Gov T&T because the NHS had it's own existing expertise in contact tracing which wasn't used and the NHS moniker is at best misleading. If you want to talk NHS then try NHS vaccine programme which is run by the NHS ...
X : Isn't pioneer / settler / town planner a copy of @KentBeck explore / expand / extract?
Me : Why does it matter?
X : They're the same!
Me : Who cares? Are they useful to you?
X : It matters who was first?
Me : Why is that important? What's wrong with having similar models?
It's like Wardley mapping and @snowded Cynefin. They have similarities, they have overlaps. This is a good thing, they are complimentary, they support each other. They have common backgrounds.
In the same way, I find complimentary approaches between pioneer / settler / town planner with explore / expand and exploit. It's a good thing. It's a positive thing. I like @KentBeck model. I also have bias, I love XP.
X : Are you a communist?
Me : No. I'm not a capitalist either.
X : Then what are you?
Me : I'm an "undestand your landscape and use appropriate methods"-ist.
X : That doesn't make sense.
Me : Did to Deng Xiaoping. It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice.
X : He was a communist.
Me : He was a pragmatist. He understood how to use tools to a nation's favour (including the market) and how to avoid dogma.
X : But you're more of a communist than a capitalist.
Me : Nope. They're both tools to me. I don't like either as a one size fits all dogma. The market and central planning have contexts in which they are useful and others in which they are not.
X : But you favour democracy?
I, for one, will miss the reasoned debates and answers (and obvious non answers) to questions as it is replaced with the normal jeering and caterwauling of the house ->
The quality of the debate is not enhanced by the baying and guffaws of others, it depends upon the quality of the leaders and the questions they ask - parliamentlive.tv/event/index/01… ...
... today's debates are more reasoned and more thoughtful without the outcries of the rabble - parliamentlive.tv/event/index/e9… ... I cannot help but think that the real desire to get everyone back into the commons is to hide Boris' bumbling.
X : Meghan and Harry?
Me : An everyday story of boy meets girl, girl meets boy and hordes of rabid racist daily mail, sun and telegraph readers pretend the problem is something other than them being rabid racists.
X : But becoming a member of ...
Me : ... if you're going to say the family, the duty, the society, the right way of behaving, the ... oh, it's just endless excuses, one after another, looking for some sort of problem with Meghan rather than looking in the mirror at yourself.
We don't call it the daily fail for nothing. You don't get much nastier than this -