Cannot believe I just talked to Cornel West. Wild.
So it turns out our exchange was almost 10 whole minutes! Multiple parts coming up.

First I plug the Pioneers of Africana Philosophy Conference (Mar. 19-20!) and explain how I follow a Millsian black radical liberal approach to thinking about racial justice as a political goal.
As I explained in an exchange with @OlufemiOTaiwo yesterday, I think there is a deep sense in which the toxicities of Western/white/patriarchal (etc.) ideology can be understood as manifestations of shamelessness. To what end then can Confucian/other non-Western virtues guide us?
After some words of praise for our man Charles, Dr. West immediately takes me through a number of historical figures relevant to the question, focusing here on Bernard Williams' work on shame, which he finds at least superficially parallel to the idea of black radical liberalism.
As Dr. West anticipates, the key philosophical figure on whose work black radical liberalism is modeled most closely is DuBois. And he suggests I might find resources for a more egalitarian conception of the virtue of shame in the work of John Dewey.
We wrap up our discussion the only way that makes sense: more praise of Charles Mills.
I highly, highly recommend everyone check out his lecture and the rest of the Q&A.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Hoadley-Brill

Sam Hoadley-Brill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @deonteleologist

11 Mar
This guy makes me sick to my fucking stomach. In this thread he feeds his followers an amount of bullshit even James Lindsay could only aspire to.
Contrast Rufo’s opening statement—using “countergenocide against white Christians” to refer to a specific solution—with his actual article’s analysis. “Countergenocide” is an ADJECTIVE (like “counterterrorist”) as in “countergenocide tactics.” This is PURE BAD FAITH. ImageImage
This is truly a fucking disgusting lie. The author, Cuauhtin, does not call for engineering any goddamn genocides. As I showed above, “countergenocide” is an ADJECTIVE. Rufo is being as honest as I am when I say he sees the ultimate goal as engineering a “Satanic” against Jews. Image
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
FULL STORY: I joined a class @ThaddeusRussell and @ConceptualJames were teaching called "Critical Theory and Postmodernism" because I knew it'd likely be the only chance I would ever have to confront James about the bullshit in his book (he's had me blocked since my review). 1/n
There were three courses. The first two covered Gramsci and the Frankfurt school philosophers, the last covered Lyotard, Beaudrillard, a bit of Derrida and a bit of Foucault. To my surprise, almost none of Cynical Theories' nonsensical depictions of the postmodernists came up. 2/
Further, we spent 2x time on the Frankfurt school as the postmodernists, the opposite of Cynical Theories, where the former were relegated to endnotes. I asked James if he could explain this at the end of the course; here's his answer (though you can see first minute cut out) 3/
Read 6 tweets
20 Feb
Here's James Lindsay introducing himself, in his testimony in support of a bill that would effectively ban the teaching of systemic or institutional racism in NH schools, as an expert (eventually even "recognized as a world-level expert"!) in critical race theory. 1/n
This clip is in fact a perfect distillation of his entire grift against CRT. He takes a somewhat controversial claim from critical race theorists, that racism is ordinary rather than aberrational in American life, and literally reduces it to a Robin DiAngelo quote. 2/n
"Other scholars." Nice, James. Didn't want to name drop someone who's increasingly being disavowed by academics, did ya now? 3/n
Read 8 tweets
18 Feb
Alright, since "Jeremy" wants the smoke, it appears I'm going to have to roll out a thread about how his team's sophistical posturing on topics like intersectionality engenders just enough confidence in their fanbase to prevent them from fact-checking. 🧵 1/
So we start here: "Intersectionality, at its core, is a *critique* on universal claims of other rights-based analytical frameworks and movements." - @SarahTheHaider

Because Crenshaw coined the term 'intersectionality,' and this does not at all describe her view, I objected. 2/ Image
Sarah doesn't like the implication she hasn't read Crenshaw; she has! Great, I hope she can show me where on Earth Crenshaw critiques universal rights-based analytic frameworks.

Turns out I had made another mistake: interpreting 'intersectionality' as Crenshaw defined it. 3/ ImageImage
Read 12 tweets
25 Jan
Greetings, comrade! Heard the delightful news? Helen Pluckrose--AKA the Mary Wollstonecraft of the 21st century--has just given Western civilization a lifeline. If Critical Race Theory kills us all, at least we'll know our queen did everything she possibly could to stop it. 1/
Ever the philosophical juggernaut, look how she resolves the company's paradoxical commitments.

Not everyone who works with Counterweight is a liberal humanist; they're merely mandated to support the tenets of liberal humanism, though they obviously don't have to. 2/
Pluckrose venerates liberalism, her metanarrative of choice, not as a philosophy grounded in equal rights and freedoms for individuals, but as "a system that allows us to disagree without turning to violence"--as we know, fascists have never risen to power in liberal contexts. 3/
Read 9 tweets
13 Jan
THREAD ~ Charles Mills v. “Master’s Tools”

This strategy—the “master’s tools” must be abandoned/destroyed—can be applied at will to generate a new radical thesis, e.g. OP’s “black people can’t be healthy.” Mills (2009) gives us compelling reasons for resisting this rhetoric. 1/
Just to address the obvious: Mills technically gets the quote wrong; it should be "the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house." The most they can do is "allow us temporarily to beat him at his own game," Lorde writes. Mills' first critiques are clear & direct: 2/
He continues by pointing to the intuitive truth that some of the master's philosophical/conceptual tools will be irredeemably racist or otherwise oppressive--such as, e.g., essentialist racial hierarchies--but some have only been used for evil contingently. 3/
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!