Nations that value victimhood as the most important currency are not equipped to resist global domination by an aggressive and brutal fascist dictatorship.
Victimhood is one of the worst possible currencies to base a society upon - and over time it tends to degenerate into THE worst currency, violence.
Victimhood follows the laws of supply and demand, just like everything else: more is produced as its value increases.
Everyone wants to manufacture a hot commodity like victimhood. Everyone wants to control its value. Like other currencies, it suffers from inflation as the supply increases. People who used to think they were rich in victimhood find themselves sliding down the totem pole.
But you can't do anything positive or constructive with the currency of victimhood. You can't bank it or invest it. It repels people from each other, rather than bringing them together in the pursuit of mutual ambitions.
A good currency increases the value of capital by making it more flexible - earning and spending money is far superior to bartering - but victimhood degrades the value of all other capital, especially the most widely owned and invested capital of all, our labor.
Victim societies degrade PEOPLE. They literally make people less valuable. Talent, skill, and dedication become less important as the value of victim status increases. Vast human potential remains untapped when only certified victims need apply.
And as we've learned through a string of scandals over the past few years, the currency of victimhood is very easy to counterfeit. Its value is unstable and fraud is rampant in a victim-based economy. The level of trust in such a system is, understandably, very low.
In the end, there are really only two mediums of exchange that allocate resources and make capital productive: trust and force. Everything boils down to some combination of those two. You work and invest because you trust you'll get paid, or because you fear you'll be punished.
Victimhood, like the brutal fascist oppression of a nation like China, trends toward force over trust. Victim economies only sputter along because the unfavored are forced to comply, forced to remain silent about corruption and injustice, forced to constantly admit their guilt.
High-trust societies prosper through freedom, and they tend to prosper more as people are left more free to cooperate and compete with each other. Conversely, freedom degrades as trust declines. Who wants to be employees or partners with people they don't trust at all?
As victimology destroys the level of trust in a society, freedom naturally gives way to compulsion. Resources still need to be allocated, but now it takes force to make people work - which comes as a nasty surprise to those who assume socialism means a cushy free ride.
Thus do people who think they're investing power in wise political elites to seek "social justice" find that the ultimate form of social justice is a vast prison, where we are all cellmates together. The privileges of victimhood are always temporary illusions. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Great Reset model of democracy rebooted with an authoritarian core is selling itself with the exact same rhetoric the Chinese Communist Party uses. The CCP also claims its people are "free" and "safe" thanks to their strong central State.
Every single argument you're hearing from woke censors right now is word-for-word identical to what the CCP says when criticized for its tyranny and human rights abuses. No difference at all. Other authoritarian states are growing more proficient with the same rhetoric.
You still have robust freedom of speech - only a paranoid would claim otherwise! It's just that you're not allowed to say false things, as determined by the Ministry of Truth. And you can't say hateful things, as determined by the Ministry of Compassion.
After years of employment growth, resurgent confidence, and the first stirrings of cultural renewal, Covid-19 shoved us back into Barack Obama's vision of Hospice America: a dying nation whose socialist caretakers consume our wealth while making our decline comfortable.
Obama's vision held that the American Century was largely a mistake, and our claims to greatness were hypocritical, unfair, and xenophobic. We belonged in those hospice beds, fading away to make room for a vibrantly multicultural world to take the reins of history.
To the Obama Democrats, American greatness was an illusion, achieved by ruthless inequality and exploitation. The socialists would see to it that our deathbeds were equally comfortable as the fire of innovation, industry, competition, and ambition died in America's graying eyes.
I'm not a fan of pointlessly inconveniencing voters, but this mad dash to make voting effortless is a horrible idea, even without considering the destruction of all ballot security and the increased risk of fraud. Requiring SOME effort makes for better voting.
One of the fascinating things about the Internet and social media age is how it has illuminated the changes in human behavior that come from eliminating ALL costs or effort from a given activity. We act very differently when the cost is a tenth of a penny rather than zero.
When it comes to voting, we unquestionably end up with a lower quality of civics and politics - and a VERY noticeably lower quality of elected official - when voting becomes a zero-effort activity. People respond to the message that voting is a frivolous activity.
Every crisis becomes a religion if it lasts long enough.
One factor in that transformation is the Beautiful Theory phenomenon: the power elite insists its remedies are logical and politically correct so they MUST work, even if the actual evidence shows they obviously don't.
When Beautiful Theories crash into hard, cold reality and shatter, faith is the glue used by the elites to put their precious ideas back together. They need MILITANT faith to get the job done: true believers eager to crush doubt and compel obedience by making war on the infidels.
Some are swept into the faith because they desperately crave a sense of control over the crisis. They need to believe Something Can Be Done, and they'd rather invest their faith in debunked Beautiful Theories than have no faith at all. Faith is a coin that demands to be spent.
Minimum wage hikes are an easy pander - thank politicians for "giving you a raise," and don't think about all the jobs they destroyed! - but they're also an important weapon in the Left's war on the middle class.
Political tinkering with the minimum wage teaches people to think of employment as a gift from the State, rather than an exercise of capitalist freedom. The Left needs to keep poor and middle-class people from seeing themselves as capitalists selling their labor for profit.
An immediate practical benefit of minimum wage hikes for socialists is that they destroy the jobs poor people need to climb into the middle class. It's like blowing up bridges so the enemy can't get reinforcements. Blowing up the on-ramps to employment secures welfare dependency.
The persistence of high taxes as a top issue for Republican voters is interesting, especially since "wartime conservatives" often needle the GOP Establishment for constantly pushing tax cuts as their only coherent policy idea.
The rap against the GOP-E is that it compromises, caves, or remains utterly silent on countless other issues, but it keeps pushing for tax cuts. The Left eats its lunch on almost every other issue and pummels the GOP for constantly demanding "tax cuts for the rich."
Some of the Left's critique now resonates with the scrappy Trump wing of the GOP, which (understandably) suspects the GOP-E is more interested in doing favors for its big donors than serving its constituents. Tax cuts and deregulation for the big fish, nothing for the guppies.