The Great Reset model of democracy rebooted with an authoritarian core is selling itself with the exact same rhetoric the Chinese Communist Party uses. The CCP also claims its people are "free" and "safe" thanks to their strong central State.
Every single argument you're hearing from woke censors right now is word-for-word identical to what the CCP says when criticized for its tyranny and human rights abuses. No difference at all. Other authoritarian states are growing more proficient with the same rhetoric.
You still have robust freedom of speech - only a paranoid would claim otherwise! It's just that you're not allowed to say false things, as determined by the Ministry of Truth. And you can't say hateful things, as determined by the Ministry of Compassion.
We're banning a few books today, and we'll ban a few more tomorrow, but don't worry - there are still tons of books you're allowed to read. We're just going to silence some haters so that people who speak of love can be heard more clearly.
Only a paranoid lunatic would call us enemies of democracy. We LOVE democracy! In fact, we'll make it better by ensuring you only have high-quality candidates with correct views to vote for. Fringe radicals will no longer be allowed to weaken democracy by gobbling up votes.
We'll make democracy stronger by ensuring core functions of the State, and matters settled forever by a "consensus" of the finest "experts," are placed beyond the reach of renegade voters. We can't have a few elected representatives thwarting the sacred Will of the People!
There are some things you just can't be allowed to resist or vote against, like justice, truth, or unity, as defined by the Ministries of Justice, Truth, and Unity. What kind of a monster would vote against those things? Nobody any good citizen should be listening to, that's who.
There will be fewer issues you're allowed to vote on, or disagree with, but that's necessary to secure the integrity of the State, so it can bring peace, justice, and security to the people. But inside that smaller, safer playground of democracy, you'll be freer than ever!
Don't worry about transparency and accountability, because we're going to make journalism better than ever too, by ensuring only properly accredited, properly trained, ideologically sound members of the Guild of Journalists can practice it. No more disinformation! Hallelujah!
Phony "journalism" from unaccredited renegades sabotages the just and righteous State - which is, need we remind you, synonymous with truth, justice, and security. There are harmful things the people don't need to know. We must be forever on guard against the Russian Bot.
Only card-carrying members of the Journalism Guild, working closely with the friendly State, can bring you the all-important Context citizens need to understand the flood of information bombarding them. Only the guild is trained to spot and suppress Badfacts.
Badfacts are technically "true," in the sense they are things that happened and there is documentation to prove it, but they REDUCE the public's wisdom and understanding because they disrupt context and damage official narratives. They're like rocks sucked into a lawn mower.
Under Democracy 2.0, the public must be protected from Badfacts that would hurt them by damaging the authoritarian core of the State and thwarting its quest for truth, justice, equity, security, and harmony. Journalism, like democracy and speech, will be smaller but BETTER.
One other thing to understand about Democracy 2.0 is that it looks FORWARD, ever forward, to progress and perfection. For that reason, it will be necessary to erase certain troublesome aspects of the past. As with Badfacts, there is Bad History the public must be protected from.
When you're driving down the difficult road toward Utopia, the last thing you need is a bunch of crotchety backseat drivers pointing at exits receding behind you and yelling that you should have turned there. Correct history is a SIMPLE narrative that builds to the bright future.
It would be foolish to teach a version of history that disrupted the operations of the core authoritarian State, interfered with the great quest for justice and equity, or provoked people into questioning the consensus of wise elites. Challenging settled issues is pointless.
Speaking of those settled issues, it would also be pointless and counterproductive to expect the elite to live under the rules they impose on lesser people, or live up to the standards and principles they claim to venerate. That would disrupt the quest for justice and equity.
The referees of a game must be able to move around the field in ways the players cannot, correct? The core operating system must follow different rules than all of the applications running on top of it. Likewise the protected authoritarian core of Democracy 2.0.
Saboteurs cannot be allowed to disrupt the Core State by wantonly charging its wise administrators with hypocrisy or insisting they live by the same rules as the masses. It simply cannot work that way. The rulers MUST be above the rules in order to enforce them.
In order to achieve justice, some people must be treated unfairly. For speech to be MEANINGFULLY free, some must be silenced. Pure Truth can only be distilled by removing Badfacts. Democracy is only constructive when the people understand what they're allowed to vote on.
You can hear all of these arguments in crude, clumsy, hysterical form from the Woke Left in the West today... or you can hear them polished, refined, and taken to their logical conclusion from the Chinese Communist Party. No difference in substance, only presentation. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nations that value victimhood as the most important currency are not equipped to resist global domination by an aggressive and brutal fascist dictatorship.
Victimhood is one of the worst possible currencies to base a society upon - and over time it tends to degenerate into THE worst currency, violence.
Victimhood follows the laws of supply and demand, just like everything else: more is produced as its value increases.
Everyone wants to manufacture a hot commodity like victimhood. Everyone wants to control its value. Like other currencies, it suffers from inflation as the supply increases. People who used to think they were rich in victimhood find themselves sliding down the totem pole.
After years of employment growth, resurgent confidence, and the first stirrings of cultural renewal, Covid-19 shoved us back into Barack Obama's vision of Hospice America: a dying nation whose socialist caretakers consume our wealth while making our decline comfortable.
Obama's vision held that the American Century was largely a mistake, and our claims to greatness were hypocritical, unfair, and xenophobic. We belonged in those hospice beds, fading away to make room for a vibrantly multicultural world to take the reins of history.
To the Obama Democrats, American greatness was an illusion, achieved by ruthless inequality and exploitation. The socialists would see to it that our deathbeds were equally comfortable as the fire of innovation, industry, competition, and ambition died in America's graying eyes.
I'm not a fan of pointlessly inconveniencing voters, but this mad dash to make voting effortless is a horrible idea, even without considering the destruction of all ballot security and the increased risk of fraud. Requiring SOME effort makes for better voting.
One of the fascinating things about the Internet and social media age is how it has illuminated the changes in human behavior that come from eliminating ALL costs or effort from a given activity. We act very differently when the cost is a tenth of a penny rather than zero.
When it comes to voting, we unquestionably end up with a lower quality of civics and politics - and a VERY noticeably lower quality of elected official - when voting becomes a zero-effort activity. People respond to the message that voting is a frivolous activity.
Every crisis becomes a religion if it lasts long enough.
One factor in that transformation is the Beautiful Theory phenomenon: the power elite insists its remedies are logical and politically correct so they MUST work, even if the actual evidence shows they obviously don't.
When Beautiful Theories crash into hard, cold reality and shatter, faith is the glue used by the elites to put their precious ideas back together. They need MILITANT faith to get the job done: true believers eager to crush doubt and compel obedience by making war on the infidels.
Some are swept into the faith because they desperately crave a sense of control over the crisis. They need to believe Something Can Be Done, and they'd rather invest their faith in debunked Beautiful Theories than have no faith at all. Faith is a coin that demands to be spent.
Minimum wage hikes are an easy pander - thank politicians for "giving you a raise," and don't think about all the jobs they destroyed! - but they're also an important weapon in the Left's war on the middle class.
Political tinkering with the minimum wage teaches people to think of employment as a gift from the State, rather than an exercise of capitalist freedom. The Left needs to keep poor and middle-class people from seeing themselves as capitalists selling their labor for profit.
An immediate practical benefit of minimum wage hikes for socialists is that they destroy the jobs poor people need to climb into the middle class. It's like blowing up bridges so the enemy can't get reinforcements. Blowing up the on-ramps to employment secures welfare dependency.
The persistence of high taxes as a top issue for Republican voters is interesting, especially since "wartime conservatives" often needle the GOP Establishment for constantly pushing tax cuts as their only coherent policy idea.
The rap against the GOP-E is that it compromises, caves, or remains utterly silent on countless other issues, but it keeps pushing for tax cuts. The Left eats its lunch on almost every other issue and pummels the GOP for constantly demanding "tax cuts for the rich."
Some of the Left's critique now resonates with the scrappy Trump wing of the GOP, which (understandably) suspects the GOP-E is more interested in doing favors for its big donors than serving its constituents. Tax cuts and deregulation for the big fish, nothing for the guppies.