Interested to see how the @metpoliceuk police this. In the current lockdown they seem to have been treating protest as essentially banned. I think that is legally wrong. Outdoor socially distanced protest should be permitted under the Covid regulations.
In the circumstances, the @metpoliceuk should confirm publicly that the protest will be permitted. However, if they do, it will be an exception to the policy they seem to have applied through the rest of the lockdown. This shows the problem with the policy.
The police should never be in the position of deciding which causes they prefer to permit to protest. Anyway, watch this space for more on that
On the law, the current lockdown regulations Prohibits gatherings of more than two people except in certain exceptions. Protest is currently not a listed exception, but it is also not banned. My view is if Parliament wanted to ban protest it would have to do it explicitly (1/3)
and the police have to, as a public authority, interpret the regulations compatibly with the Human Rights Act which, unlike the lockdown regulations, is primary legislation. This includes the right to freedom of assembly under Article 11 ECHR. This should mean at the least (2/3)
that socially distanced outdoor protest (does not pose significant risk in public health terms) is lawful as it would be a ‘reasonable excuse’ and therefore a defence to breaking the gathering rule. Regulations here - this is not legal advice! legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374… (3/3)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

12 Mar
Have to log out but this is the point:

At 3pm today every police force in England was saying protest could never be lawful under Covid regs.

The position now, because of the ruling, is protest can in principle be lawful and it is up to the police to assess the proportionality
The only reason judge didn't make declaration we wanted (that the right to protest has to be part of every decision made by police re protest) is the police conceded the point just before the hearing, contrary to their policy which we had and also their statements to our clients.
Absolutely amazing effort by @ReclaimTS - we are lucky to have such amazing publicly minded women in our society.

Legal team @TomRHickman @PippaWoodrow @jpormerod John Halford, Theodora Middleton @BindmansLLP put together case in 24 hours.

Will have a big impact, trust me
Read 5 tweets
11 Mar
UPDATE

After the below tweets I spent much of today speaking to women across England about their plans to organise #ReclaimTheseStreets vigils.

All plans include social distancing & masks

It turned out that police were generally saying that all such gatherings were illegal /1
The organisers could face £10k fines, and participants could be prosecuted or face fines of £100s.

@metpoliceuk initially told @ReclaimTS organisers they wanted to allow it to happen but late this afternoon reversed their position and said that their "hands were tied" /2
A great team at @BindmansLLP @BlackstoneChbrs @DoughtyStreet and I are working to get urgent hearing before High Court tomorrow to declare Met Police misunderstood their duties under Human Rights Act.

The case needs urgent support crowdjustice.com/case/reclaimth… /3
Read 5 tweets
5 Mar
🚨Changes to lockdown and face covering regulations coming into force this Monday 8th just published

The Health Protection (Coronavirus) (Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place and Restrictions: All Tiers) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/247/…
Brief explanatory note
First important change - to the face covering regulations.

Basically trying to prevent face covering rules being “exercised so as to prevent a voter who is otherwise entitled to vote… from doing so”. What does that mean, exactly?

Sounds pretty circular to me.
Read 17 tweets
5 Mar
I am supporting this campaign to help the Markaz in Golders Green, a Muslim community centre, to change it terms of use from a Christian community building to a general religious one

(short thread - mixture of sad and hopeful)

loveoverhatebarnet.com
You may think this should be uncontroversial. I met with the leadership of the Markaz in my chambers a while back (they were lovely) and was shocked to hear about the often racist, sometimes far right, opposition to the centre. I told them I would do whatever I could to help.
The opponents have enlisted someone called Gavin Boby to lead their campaign - he self-describes as "the Mosque Buster" and has this racist logo. He prides himself at blocking planning applications for mosques. gavinboby.com
Read 7 tweets
5 Mar
Also worth mentioning Lady Justice Rose is the fifth Jewish Justice of the Supreme Court in its 11-year history following Justices Phillips, Neuberger, Dyson, Collins (2 of its 4 Presidents have been Jewish). An amazing achievement for a community of 300,000 people
Lady Justice Rose lit the Chanukah candles in the Temple in 2017 at the little annual event I organise which oddly hasn’t made into her official bio!
🕎
Anyway, this has led me to finding this interesting speech given by Lord Neuberger - this para can now proudly be updated supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-17…
Read 6 tweets
4 Mar
Some thoughts on the legal and ethical implications of ‘vaccine passports’ (thread)
Vaccine passports are controversial and the govt is reviewing the possibility of their use.

This thread brings together the main arguments for and against and gives sources for further reading.

There will be no “bad or good” answer so if you want that look elsewhere.
I’ll split this into four sections

1. INTRO - WHAT ARE THEY?

A ‘vaccine certificate’ or ‘passport’ is, in the simplest form, a means of proving that a person has been vaccinated. This can be paper or digital.
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!