First important change - to the face covering regulations.
Basically trying to prevent face covering rules being “exercised so as to prevent a voter who is otherwise entitled to vote… from doing so”. What does that mean, exactly?
Sounds pretty circular to me.

Second change:
This is welcome. Allowing political campaigning for “election purposes” as a reason to be outside home
“campaigning” means undertaking activities for election purposes or for referendum purposes, and “campaigner” means a person who undertakes such activities;”
Third big change:
“open air recreation” allowed again, as expected, with your household, linked household, linked childcare household or one other person not from your household.
So picnics, bird watching, relaxing on a bench for no other reason than it is nice all back.
What does this cheeky little line mean?
It means that no account is to be taken of children under 5 or a carer.
So a parent with two kids under 5 can meet another parent with 2 kids under 5 for a picnic
A few minor changes to Schedule 3A (the Tier 4 rules)
You can also gather in sculpture parks and allotments - hooray?
You can now use supervised activities for children for an additional reason (still narrow)
As I suggested would happen students can move for the Easter holidays
*NON COMMERCIAL BREAK*
I explain the Coronavirus regulations here for free but if you want to say thanks please consider giving a few £ to my @LawCentres fundraiser
Anyone leaving United Kingdom (not just England) must have with them a completed form recording amongst other things “reason P is leaving or outside the place where P is living”
This is to ensure people have a reasonable excuse to travel
You also have to fill in forms for children and a person who lacks mental capacity if you are responsible for them
And here’s the kicker - if you don’t fill in the form a “relevant person” can direct you to do it and if you still don’t, or “intentionally or recklessly provide false or misleading information” that is a criminal offence
£200 fixed penalty notices available too
A relevant person is
- a constable,
- police community support officer,
- a person designated by a local authority for the purposes of this regulation, or
- a person designated by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this regulation. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374…
These are the people exempt from filling in a travel declaration - same or very similar to the list in the international travel regulations (don’t know why these rules are in the All Tiers regulations but there you go)
I think that's everything.
Prob 2 most important changes are (a) open air recreation permitted and,
(b) travel declarations which makes it easier to enforce the indirect international travel ban which arises from the ban on being outside the home without a reasonable excuse
I am supporting this campaign to help the Markaz in Golders Green, a Muslim community centre, to change it terms of use from a Christian community building to a general religious one
You may think this should be uncontroversial. I met with the leadership of the Markaz in my chambers a while back (they were lovely) and was shocked to hear about the often racist, sometimes far right, opposition to the centre. I told them I would do whatever I could to help.
The opponents have enlisted someone called Gavin Boby to lead their campaign - he self-describes as "the Mosque Buster" and has this racist logo. He prides himself at blocking planning applications for mosques. gavinboby.com
Also worth mentioning Lady Justice Rose is the fifth Jewish Justice of the Supreme Court in its 11-year history following Justices Phillips, Neuberger, Dyson, Collins (2 of its 4 Presidents have been Jewish). An amazing achievement for a community of 300,000 people
Lady Justice Rose lit the Chanukah candles in the Temple in 2017 at the little annual event I organise which oddly hasn’t made into her official bio!
🕎
Anyway, this has led me to finding this interesting speech given by Lord Neuberger - this para can now proudly be updated supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-17…
I think the only way this could be justifiable is if it is a clever advert for @Baddiel's book. I mean, literally has "Should Jews count" in the title...
There is an interesting debate whether Jews are a religion/ethnicity/ethnicities. In law, being Jewish is both a race and a religion for discrimination, harassment etc. But the framing here - as "will we let Jews be an ethnic minority" is insensitive and historically ignorant
Rather than go into more detail I recommend watching @benjamincohen's interview as he put it really well
This is hardly the first time that the courts have said the Secretary of State should be given the benefit of the doubt on judgments national security.
But...
The courts (and the Human Rights Act) are supposed to be a safety net to temper executive power.
And that is particularly important when political decisions are taken at the expense of an individual's rights because the person is unpopular and the decision is therefore popular.
You may say Sajid Javid had only security motives when stripping Begum of her citizenship.
But consider, for a moment, if he did not.
What check and balance is in place to ensure she has a fair chance of revealing that?