🚨Changes to lockdown and face covering regulations coming into force this Monday 8th just published

The Health Protection (Coronavirus) (Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place and Restrictions: All Tiers) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/247/…
Brief explanatory note
First important change - to the face covering regulations.

Basically trying to prevent face covering rules being “exercised so as to prevent a voter who is otherwise entitled to vote… from doing so”. What does that mean, exactly?

Sounds pretty circular to me.
Second change:

This is welcome. Allowing political campaigning for “election purposes” as a reason to be outside home

“campaigning” means undertaking activities for election purposes or for referendum purposes, and “campaigner” means a person who undertakes such activities;”
Third big change:

“open air recreation” allowed again, as expected, with your household, linked household, linked childcare household or one other person not from your household.

So picnics, bird watching, relaxing on a bench for no other reason than it is nice all back.
What does this cheeky little line mean?

It means that no account is to be taken of children under 5 or a carer.

So a parent with two kids under 5 can meet another parent with 2 kids under 5 for a picnic
A few minor changes to Schedule 3A (the Tier 4 rules)

You can also gather in sculpture parks and allotments - hooray?
You can now use supervised activities for children for an additional reason (still narrow)
As I suggested would happen students can move for the Easter holidays
*NON COMMERCIAL BREAK*

I explain the Coronavirus regulations here for free but if you want to say thanks please consider giving a few £ to my @LawCentres fundraiser

£290 off the target!

justgiving.com/fundraising/ad…
Fourth big change: travel declarations

Anyone leaving United Kingdom (not just England) must have with them a completed form recording amongst other things “reason P is leaving or outside the place where P is living”

This is to ensure people have a reasonable excuse to travel
You also have to fill in forms for children and a person who lacks mental capacity if you are responsible for them
And here’s the kicker - if you don’t fill in the form a “relevant person” can direct you to do it and if you still don’t, or “intentionally or recklessly provide false or misleading information” that is a criminal offence

£200 fixed penalty notices available too
A relevant person is
- a constable,
- police community support officer,
- a person designated by a local authority for the purposes of this regulation, or
- a person designated by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this regulation.
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1374…
These are the people exempt from filling in a travel declaration - same or very similar to the list in the international travel regulations (don’t know why these rules are in the All Tiers regulations but there you go)
I think that's everything.

Prob 2 most important changes are (a) open air recreation permitted and,
(b) travel declarations which makes it easier to enforce the indirect international travel ban which arises from the ban on being outside the home without a reasonable excuse
My COVID-19 regulations table is now updated - up to 69 sets of regulations docs.google.com/document/d/1ne…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

5 Mar
I am supporting this campaign to help the Markaz in Golders Green, a Muslim community centre, to change it terms of use from a Christian community building to a general religious one

(short thread - mixture of sad and hopeful)

loveoverhatebarnet.com
You may think this should be uncontroversial. I met with the leadership of the Markaz in my chambers a while back (they were lovely) and was shocked to hear about the often racist, sometimes far right, opposition to the centre. I told them I would do whatever I could to help.
The opponents have enlisted someone called Gavin Boby to lead their campaign - he self-describes as "the Mosque Buster" and has this racist logo. He prides himself at blocking planning applications for mosques. gavinboby.com
Read 7 tweets
5 Mar
Also worth mentioning Lady Justice Rose is the fifth Jewish Justice of the Supreme Court in its 11-year history following Justices Phillips, Neuberger, Dyson, Collins (2 of its 4 Presidents have been Jewish). An amazing achievement for a community of 300,000 people
Lady Justice Rose lit the Chanukah candles in the Temple in 2017 at the little annual event I organise which oddly hasn’t made into her official bio!
🕎
Anyway, this has led me to finding this interesting speech given by Lord Neuberger - this para can now proudly be updated supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-17…
Read 6 tweets
4 Mar
Some thoughts on the legal and ethical implications of ‘vaccine passports’ (thread)
Vaccine passports are controversial and the govt is reviewing the possibility of their use.

This thread brings together the main arguments for and against and gives sources for further reading.

There will be no “bad or good” answer so if you want that look elsewhere.
I’ll split this into four sections

1. INTRO - WHAT ARE THEY?

A ‘vaccine certificate’ or ‘passport’ is, in the simplest form, a means of proving that a person has been vaccinated. This can be paper or digital.
Read 35 tweets
1 Mar
I think the only way this could be justifiable is if it is a clever advert for @Baddiel's book. I mean, literally has "Should Jews count" in the title...
There is an interesting debate whether Jews are a religion/ethnicity/ethnicities. In law, being Jewish is both a race and a religion for discrimination, harassment etc. But the framing here - as "will we let Jews be an ethnic minority" is insensitive and historically ignorant
Rather than go into more detail I recommend watching @benjamincohen's interview as he put it really well
Read 8 tweets
26 Feb
Why is the Shamima Begum judgment troubling?

This is hardly the first time that the courts have said the Secretary of State should be given the benefit of the doubt on judgments national security.

But...
The courts (and the Human Rights Act) are supposed to be a safety net to temper executive power.

And that is particularly important when political decisions are taken at the expense of an individual's rights because the person is unpopular and the decision is therefore popular.
You may say Sajid Javid had only security motives when stripping Begum of her citizenship.

But consider, for a moment, if he did not.

What check and balance is in place to ensure she has a fair chance of revealing that?
Read 17 tweets
25 Feb
Here is latest data on Fixed Penalty Notices given out under coronavirus regulations from @PoliceChiefs

26,277 fines were processed between 17 January and 14 February (68,952 overall - so 38% of total)

Massive weekly increase over last lockdown

cdn.prgloo.com/media/c1cd9d23…
As before, a large majority given out to younger (under 35) men
19% of Fixed Penalty Notices have been given out to black and minority ethnic people - assume mostly young men as well.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!