Very happy to see this announcement today from @FDAOncology . Early approval based on surrogate and appropriate action upon failure to confirm clinical benefit in confirmatory trial is the mandate of accelerated approval. fda.gov/news-events/fd…
Several of our works @PORTAL_Research have previously highlighted that this follow-through has not been happening. Failure to act when drugs fail to improve clinical benefit in confirmatory trials breaks the social compromise of AA. I will share 2 imp papers in this regard.
First, in this @JAMAInternalMed paper we published last year, we show that confirmatory trials do not confirm clinical benefit using survival endpoints and even when confirmatory trials fail, no actions are usually taken. jamanetwork.com/journals/jamai…@akesselheim
Second, in this @NatRevClinOncol paper, we discuss why not completing confirmatory trials in time and not taking action when confirmatory trials fail break the social compromise of accelerated approval. nature.com/articles/s4157…@akesselheim
So, this decision by the FDA to review these drug-indications where confirmatory trials have failed to confirm clinical benefit is a very positive step. fda.gov/news-events/fd…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This thread is going to be a collection of all my #globaloncology papers, primarily for my own reference to bookmark for quick access but also, just in case, it is helpful for any colleague with an interest in global oncology. 1/
This is probably one of the most important papers we’ve ever published. This paper in British Journal of Hematology highlights the story of how Bone Marrow Transplant services started in Nepal under @Poudyalbishesh ‘s initiative. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
Seems like this is the time to look back upon your year. Here’s a thread on my tweets from 2019 that I’d like to share again with the new followers. No particular order. Here’s the first one: medscape.com/viewarticle/91… I learned a lot by reading all the comments to this piece.
There's a great coverage today in @Medscape of our latest @bmj_latest paper. Unfortunately, I'll have to disagree with these comments from an expert which I find disrespectful. RANTORIAL ahead. medscape.com/viewarticle/90…
All 4 authors in our @bmj_latest paper are medical oncologists. It's our daily job to talk to patients about benefits and side effects of cancer drugs. What's the basis for suggesting that we didn't talk to patients? The no. of medical oncologists in the world is ..surprise. >1!
This statement assumes that cancer drugs make a difference between living and dying. I wish that were true, but it's not. This is false dichotomy. It's nearly always a trade-off, not such a clear dichotomy: life with drug, death without drug. Such false dichotomies hurt pts.