6. Popular sovereignty 7. States' rights 8. Nationalism
GODDAMN IT TARIFFS WHY'D YOU HAVE TO BE SO DIVISIVE
John C. Calhoun: teach the controversy
"How were slaves treated by their masters?"
There's an entire objective dedicated to "ULYSSES S. GRANT WAS REALLY BAD Y'ALL"
After that, ZERO about the crushing of multiracial democracy in the South. No mention of black people for the next 18 objectives.
Gotta learn about the Grange!
When you finally get to the civil rights movement, the emphasis is all on courts and Congress, not the movement itself (or, really, what made it necessary!).
The activities? Mostly about black athletes. Like "Karem" Abdul "Jabar" and "Sachel" "Page" and "Authur" Ashe.
A unit all about 70s/80s politics (in which affirmative action is part of the "New Feminism"?).
Then they remembered women exist so they randomly crammed in an activity about them.
One of the most common takeaways from bad U.S. history classes is that white people *very nicely* set aside their tariff disputes to free black people in the 1860s — but then for some reason white people had to free them *again* in the 1960s?!?!?
Curricula like this is why.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I love local news, but my god this lawsuit is pure nonsense. It’s as if newspapers sued radio in 1920, billboards in 1940, TV in 1960, direct mail companies in 1980, cable systems in 1990, and businesses for setting up their own websites in 2000.
Do any of you remember the name of a major French novel, translated maybe ~5 years ago into English, whose name was just, like, 3 or 4 capital letters? And "H" was one or two of them?
Like HHRQ, or HRVT, or HMTS, or something?
This was a big enough novel that it got reviewed in the major book reviews, etc. — more attention than a typical translated French novel would get.
Any ideas?
YES WE HAVE A WINNER
(Seriously, there is no better reference desk than my Twitter followers, I love you all)
I am very sorry to report the death of @bydebprice, a tremendous journalist, a Nieman Fellow (Class of 2011), and a real trailblazer for LGBTQ people in newsrooms and around the country.
1/x
One trail she blazed: In 1992, Deb — then an editor in the Washington bureau of the @detroitnews — launched the first nationally syndicated column about gay issues to run in mainstream newspapers.
It's hard to overestimate how significant this was. This was long before the Internet gave Americans a window into any topic or community they wanted. Most people got a huge share of their information about the world from the local daily and local TV news.
In small-town Louisiana, it was still cool in 1926 to arrest "idle negroes" who weren't working for local white farmers.
Once their labor force was captive, farmers would bail them out "as fast as they were locked up" and put them to work to pay off their bail.
(The Rayne Tribune, Oct. 9, 1926.)
Still happening in Shreveport in 1945.
And note the union involvement. People don't realize how much of the anti-union sentiment in the south is based on the desire to continue ownership over the labor of black people after 1865.
Biden (and, to an extent, Chris Wallace) have an astonishing opportunity on Tuesday night.
There have been a gazillion shocking stories written about Trump — and in general, they've barely moved the needle.
But on Tuesday, up to 100 million people will be...paying attention.
Biden has an enormous menu of options on what to focus on from the past 4 years — not just what's important but what might *stick* when people are paying attention that didn't when people weren't.
Like, remember the NYT tax evasion story from 2018? "Trump stole hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayers through an illegal scheme to enrich himself."
Would that stick any better when 100 million people are focused, for however short a moment?