This is not even a contestable fact. It’s demonstrably true. Human classification sits at the roots of the emergence of science in the 18th C, and in all cases it was both hierarchical and in service of the political ideology of European expansion, colonialism and subjugation.
He’s a historian of science btw. Kant, Voltaire, Linnaeus, Blumenbach, Hume, and other giants voices on the Enlightenment were heavily invested in classification schemes that directly enabled and nurtured the subjugation of nations.
This is so uncontroversial it’s baffling to have to say it out loud, let alone write it in a best selling book #HowToArgueWithARacist
You can (erroneously) call it Critical Race Theory if it makes you feel better, but actually it is history, which has no duty to make you feel warm and fuzzy.
That Jordan Peterson rejects these facts is unsurprising. It is his modus operandi to assert the importance of something without under it. Qv: evolutionary theory.

I am so so fucking bored with this by the way.
And yes I know being wrong in the internet is some kind of divine right, but these are people with millions of followers and minions, who believe every word of Peterson’s effluence, when he hasn’t even done the most desultory research to understand the thing on which he opines.
He is literally making people stupider.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Adam Rutherford

Dr Adam Rutherford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamRutherford

7 Mar
I’ll tell you something that is not a social construct. Fondue.

Pray for us.
Update
I don’t feel good. Is fondue even food? My tongue, why can I feel my tongue
Read 4 tweets
7 Mar
Science is a social construct.

Science is a way of knowing, employing a set of methods that are agreed and performed by people. Science does not exist outside of this framework, even with eloquent flourish.

Ergo, science is a social construct.
The idea of social constructs has for some become synonymous with postmodern, or Frankfurt School bullshittery. I am unsure if RD is doing this here, but it’s unfortunate. Time, money, race are all social constructs, which are all important *because* they are socially constructed
Science is a way of knowing, and it is not possible to have a way of knowing without a human mind. Science only exists as a social construct.
Read 7 tweets
1 Mar
A quick note of thanks. #HowToArgueWithARacist is at number 2 in the Times paperback charts. I'm very proud to be alongside friends @CCriadoPerez @Philippa_Perry and Deborah Orr, whom we miss terribly.
[I've no idea what that book is at 1, but I do not like the title at all]
I'm proud of this book, and delighted that it has found an audience, not least with it being selected as @Waterstones book of the month.
bit.ly/370vcsj
Here's a line which I think is important - though I borrowed it from Helen Lewis, who borrowed it from someone else.
Read 4 tweets
26 Feb
I’ve been writing and teaching about eugenics for 20 years, and now it is time to get those ideas down into a book, my 3rd for @jennyjennylord, 4th for @wnbooks #FasterSmarterStronger on the dark history and science of eugenics, and it’s troubling comeback in the 21st century.
@jennyjennylord @wnbooks In the meantime, i'll be giving the annual @CPMOxford lecture tonight at 6, bit.ly/3kusWzc
Read 5 tweets
3 Feb
Its very hard to reconcile this tweet with the history of intelligence testing. The first attempt to standardise preIQ cognitive ability tests were by the British eugenicist Francis Galton.
The Binet-Simon test in 1905 was intended to identify mental retardation in school children, and they were indeed French. This was standardised in 1916 by American eugenicist Lewis Tiernan into the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale.
G was introduced by the British eugenicist Charles Spearman in 1904.

The Binet and Simon Test of Intellectual Capacity was published in 1908 by the American eugenicist Henry Goddard.

The term IQ was coined by the German psychologist William Stern.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
This callow actor casually slagging off physics teachers on the BBC is shameful, embarrassing, and anti-educational. It serves none of the BBC’s values.
I don't wish a pile on. But these stereotypes are damaging. It's stuff similar to this that tells girls they can't do physics, or that science is for nerds not cool kids.
These anti-intellectual stereotypes are why we have such cultural ignorance about scientific practice, which fuel conspiracy theories about climate change or vaccines, or pandemics.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!