Women shouldn’t experience fear, harassment or harm on our streets. This has to stop, and creating safer and welcoming streets will be part of that.
This is especially important when it comes to walking, cycling or taking public transport, which we must enable more people to choose. Inclusive streets have to prioritise these transport choices, & the space needed for them.
We need cycle routes that are comfortable for all. Women shouldn’t have to choose between braving traffic or unlit parks & empty industrial estates. Routes must be direct, lit, with people around.
We must make our streets more people-friendly with schemes like Low Traffic Neighbourhoods. Places feel safer where human interaction is easier - where other people are walking, cycling & chatting, not just passing through in cars cut off from the world outside.
There is so much more needed to do so women feel safe & end male violence against them. But this is a start - the mayor and councils need to champion and deliver schemes that redesign our streets make them places where everyone feels safer.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with London Cycling Campaign

London Cycling Campaign Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @London_Cycling

11 Mar
1/7 We have serious concerns about this council report for next week’s decision on the #KensingtonHighStreet cycle lanes. Why? Its tone is biased, it has errors, and it considers ‘doing nothing’ a valid option for this dangerous road.

rbkc.gov.uk/committees/Doc…
2/7 The report is biased *against* the cycle lanes. Eg some public misconceptions (cyclists don’t pay road tax!) are reported without comment, while supportive comments (cycling is better for climate!) are questioned.
(Btw, zero evidence that the cycle lanes caused congestion) ImageImage
3/7 Forty-eight organisations who publicly supported the cycle lanes via @betterstreetskc *aren’t named* in the report. Why?

They include NHS Imperial Trust, Royal College of Music and RBKC Youth Council. No one important, then...🙄 Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!