Hey #TeamJustice,
Hope you don’t mind if I share a personal story and rememberance. We buried an extraordinary man last Saturday: retired MPD Homicide Detective Lorren Leadmon. Lorren taught me so much about how to investigate AND prosecute murder cases in Washington, DC. ...
Indeed, he taught several generations of Assistant US Attorneys how to do the job . . . and many of them didn’t even realize they were being schooled.
Two quick stories: I was prosecuting a murder case in the 1990s and we were litigating a motion to suppress evidence. ...
The Judge was a strong, smart, fair, no-nonsense judge who I liked, respected and admired. Many years earlier, she had been a prosecutor in my office - the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia - and had worked cases with Lorren. ...
I called Lorren to the stand as my witness on the motion, but before I could begin asking him questions, the Judge interjected, saying, “I want to give the defense attorney an opportunity to object to me presiding over the case.” I was taken aback as I had no idea what was ...
happening. In that moment I felt like I must have missed some important development in the case. Why in the world would the judge feel like she could no longer preside over this trial? The judge then clarified, “years ago, I worked many cases with Detective Leadmon. ...
Given my professional experiences with him and my familiarity with his work, I don’t know if I can judge his testimony fairly and objectively, because I don’t think I could ever find his testimony anything less than entirely credible. Accordingly, I want to give the defense
attorneys an opportunity to challenge me for cause & I will assign this case to another judge.” This may be the single greatest tribute to a law enforcement office: being so honest, honorable, ethical & truthful that a judge could not envision herself finding anything you say ...
unworthy of belief.
One more story: some years later, Lorren & I had a case in which a young lady (we’ll call her Susan) - the 16-year-old girlfriend of the murder defendant - had the misfortune of 1. being in “love” w/a man who was in the habit of shooting & robbing people &...
2. being a witness to one such shooting that resulted in a murder. Susan ended up as a testifying witness at trial against her boyfriend. Not surprisingly, she was upset & terrified at the prospect of testifying. But she was determined to do the right thing. We moved Susan ...
and her family for their safety. On the day of her trial appearance, Susan was petrified, almost unable to communicate. During her testimony, she sobbed loudly and openly, devestated at having to implicate her boyfriend in a murder AND terrified at the prospect of being ...
perceived as a “snitch.”Indeed, several of the defendant’s criminal associates had packed the public courtroom in an obvious attempt to intimidate Susan.
As excruciating as it was for her, Susan made it through her testimony. She left the courtroom exhausted, ..
drained and despondent. It seemed like she struggled just to travel the 75 feet from the witness stand to the witness room adjacent to the courtroom.
Lorren and I entered the witness room to see how she was doing. She was sitting on the floor, crying uncontrollably.
We told her what a good, honorable and important thing she had just done. We tried to console her. We told her how proud we were of her. She remained upset, her crying continued unabated.
Lorren then said to her, “young lady, what might make you feel better right about now?”
Susan tried to collect herself, thought for a minute, then said through her tears, “I could use some new shoes.”
Without missing a beat, Lorren said, “darlin’ let’s get you some new shoes.” He then took Susan shoe shopping, got her some lunch and delivered her home safely.
Lorren Leadmon served the people of the District of Columbia for 38 years, then served as an intelligence analyst with ATF for another 12 years. He was a man of extraordinary decency, integrity and empathy. I was so lucky to have him as a friend and a mentor.
We have to work tirelessly to rid our law enforcement agencies of the Derek Chauvins of the world. But we could sure use many more Lorren Leadmons protecting and serving We The People. Thanks for listening friends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We really need to STOP calling what will kick off tomorrow an impeachment “trial.” It’s NOT a trial, & that term misleads & creates false expectations. One of the bedrock principles in an actual trial is that the jurors can have NO personal stake in the outcome or involvement ...
in the offense that is the subject of the trial. The senators are disqualified on both fronts - they ALL have a personal/political interest in the outcome of the case AND they were all personally involved in the matter being tried ...
The Senators are themselves victims of the insurrection, witnesses to the insurrection and/or, in some cases, potentially aiders and abettors to the insurrection. They could never in a million years serve as jurors in anything that could be called a “trial” as they are
I think the Stone commutation should be challenged as the product of a criminal conspiracy. You can’t win the case you don’t bring. We made law in DC by bringing the fist case of urban warfare homicide liability for ALL participants in a gun battle committed in a manner that ...
endangered the lives of innocent bystanders. I was told it couldn’t be done because there was no precedent. We did it, and the DCCA sanctioned/adopted it as a lawful theory of homicide liability. I was told I could not try a killer in absentia from his hospital bed at the
United Medical Center after he starved himself into physical incapacitation such that he could not be transported to the courtroom to be present at the “commencement of his trial.” I was told it couldn’t be done because there is no precedent (indeed, there is contrary precedent).
Hey All. Have been listening to the audio of today's hearing in the Mike Flynn case. The first hour was Judge Sullivan presenting a thorough, compelling overview of the positions and arguments of the parties. He highlighted several times that the court is not supposed to be
a "rubber stamp" for a DOJ/prosecution motion to dismiss. The court has an important, albeit limited, role in guarding against government corruption of the criminal justice system, including politically motivated dismissals. Indeed, Judge Sullivan noted that the court has a role
in protecting the public interest. Although perhaps not 100% verbatim, Judge Sullivan noted that the judiciary has a substantial constitutional interest in maintaining the integrity of the rule of law and guarding against politically corrupt dismissals. He seemed troubled by the
Why has no one tried to put a stop to McConnell’s unconstitutional/illegal running of the Senate? He thwarts the will of the people by disallowing legislation to be debated. Regarding the Merrick Garland nomination, McConnell violated the constitutional “advice and consent”
requirement by refusing to allow a vote on President Obama’s SCOTUS nomination. Could the Obama administration have announced that, because McConnell violated the Constitution by refusing to hold a confirmation hearing, thereby wrongfully abdicating
the Senate’s “advice and consent” responsibilities, Judge Garland will take his position on the Supreme Court because Mitch McConnell’s refusal to hold a hearing is deemed a waiver of the Senate’s “advice and consent” responsibilities. What would have happened then?
The Carnival Barker Who Would Be King:
The United States of American certainly isn’t the first country to see its government succumb to rampant corruption. We Americans tend to look back at Nazi Germany or apartheid South Africa
and say to ourselves, “that could never happen here.” And perhaps that’s true, at least partially. We have not rounded up, confined and exterminated millions of people. We have not wholly deprived people of their civil or human rights based on their race, ethnicity or religion
(at least not recently). No, ours is a uniquely American atrocity.
Our atrocity involves an all-consuming quest to acquire and retain power. It started with an unflinchingly amoral, failed businessman turned successful political conman. The carnival barker who would be king.
This is actually an important Q, IMO, Ryan. It sounds like the stuff of crime fiction novels or legal thriller movies, but ... I hope Biden’s transition team has serious discussions about the prospect of seeking an arrest warrant for Trump the minute Biden is sworn in.
Mueller gave us a blueprint for prosecuting Trump. There are several felony obstruction of justice crimes documented in Vol. II of the Mueller report. The evidence supporting those charges FAR EXCEEDS the probable cause showing necessary to obtain an arrest warrant.
IMO, any judge reviewing an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant for obstruction of justice that included the evidence in Vol. II would be obligated but their of office to order the issuance of an arrest warrant. Of course, there are so many other crimes that are similarly