Agreed. To be slightly facetious, something you quickly realise if you study WW2 beyond the 'Channel 5 documentary' level is that Churchill largely saved the nation by not being Lord Halifax, and then being a stubborn git when required.
The REALLY fun history is the social, logistics, codebreaking, tactical, politics etc stuff that went on AROUND him. And the people involved in doing all that.
Although Churchill's interactions with Roosevelt are pretty fascinating and important. That's true enough.
But the obsession with the myth gets in the way of exploring the darker consequences of his mindset, approach and biases (both personal and 'of his time').
And that's what leads to Ladybird Book Churchill being an icon for people like Johnson, and them learning the wrong lessons
Anyway, join me next Monday for my next short Twitter essay, which will be titled:
THE PENINSULAR WAR: Can We Stop Talking About the Rifles for Just Ten Minutes Please. Ten Minutes. That's All I Ask.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A quick morning follow up thread on this, now I can see which why the big paper stories are going.
Let's revisit the subject of narrative, why controlling it is important to Uber, and I'll explain how they exploit the lack of continuity in UK newsrooms. /1
Controlling the narrative is important to Uber because, as I've talked about before, they're an investment package first and a provider of services second.
To be snarky, the services don't pay the bills (they make a loss). Fresh investment is a continual need.
For investors to invest, Uber needs to at least be able to claim that:
1) They are meeting minimum legal obligations 2) They have a path to profitability.
I won't go into why 2) is dodgy. Short version: transport doesn't scale like tech. See thread:
1) Uber didn't reclassify its drivers as workers, the COURTS did. Uber is just doing the paperwork 2) Drivers already earn more than the minimum wage 3) They're still refusing to count idle time as work
Well first up, a reminder that if you've not read my previous Uber stuff over the years, and how they tech-broed themselves into an unnecessary (but hilarious) encounter with the Duck Test in UK law, then start here:
Now you're caught up, what does this announcement mean?
Well... nothing really. Nothing new anyway. They're doing what they had to do. If they hadn't made these changes promptly they'd have lost their operator licenses.
Uber are just very good at writing press releases.
I'm fully expecting now not to get one, and then to be told that they rang my landline - the number of which even I don't know. Despite them being aware I was standing outside the surgery at 11:05am and do not own a warp drive.
And, obviously, sending me the text on my mobile.
Thing is, if they DON'T call now I'm not just going to be super annoyed at how much this has fucked up my day, but also massively disappointed.
I've turned my phone off silent for this now so I don't miss it.
After 3yrs I'm excited to find out what my phone actually sounds like
Well this has been a day of being amazed at how many people CANNOT separate:
"Well I think the law should work X way"
From:
"The law actually works X way"
You can't argue with how the law works. And if you want to change it for the BETTER, you have to start by accepting that.
Operational Control of policing in London is not the same as Strategic Control no matter how hard you wish it was
Your ten minutes of googling is not the same as having covered City Hall, its output, and its endless debates, committees and legislation for the last fifteen years.
I'm not a "Khan apologist". The man ghosted me for YEARS because I highlighted the MASSIVE fuck-up his fare freeze was.
All I did this morning was try to clarify the LEGISLATION. If you want to make better hot takes, you have to accept and understand the law.