Asylum-seekers are “pulled” to UK by the hope of ... overcrowded grotty “hotels” + £8 per week.
So they need to be put in new-built “centres” instead...
For 20 years U.K. Gov has “dispersed” asylum-seekers away from arrival points (London/SE England) to areas with cheaper housing - and to spread responsibility across all regions.
Patel will reverse that and build accommodation centres in SE England.
Since 1994, UK Home Secs have repeatedly increased controls on asylum-seekers, always claiming that freedoms “pull”, and removing them will cut applications.
They’re insatiable. Ask them what *isn’t* a pull factor, please!
Asylum-seekers used to have right to work - but not for first six months then:
1994: ended access to income support
1999: when destitute asylum-seekers turned to local authorities, Home Office takes over provision of accommodation.
2000: Home Office runs asylum-seeker accommodation - voucher only system. Less than income support rates. People find they can’t get change or choose the cheapest shops.
2002: Gov bars asylum-seekers from supporting themselves by working
2005: new EU law requires UK to let asylum-seekers work if they’ve been waiting *a year* for a Home Office decision +
2010: Supreme Court orders Gov to give permission to work to asylum-seekers waiting a year for a *second* Home Office decision
Home Office responds by limiting permission to shortage occupations. Like surgeons. 🤦 +
2019: Home Office gives 10 year, billion £ contracts to Serco, Clearsprings, Mears to arrange asylum-seeker accommodation. asylummatters.org/wp-content/upl…
2019: While Serco avoid accommodating asylum-seekers by coming to pick them up from home when they’re at the doctors, Home Office tells High Court contracts are great deal because fixed charge to HO for each person - regardless of cost of accommodation + bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…
2020: pandemic. Home Office has tied in 3 big businesses to a duty to arrange accommodation at no extra cost to Gov *and* UK hotels are empty!
But Home Office tells them to take over a semi-abandoned barracks & training camp?
Why - except to create dangerous conditions? +
2021: 8 years of billion £ accomm contracts to run. But Home Office wants to spend public money building new “reception” centres ... because grotty vermin-ridden hotels, no work and hardly any money are“pull factor”?
How will they make living in a centres nastier than that? /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
RT 🔒 The maximum pay rise anyone has had in HMRC is 1% a year for the last 10 years. The department was rightly about to have a ton of equal pay claims. +
RT 🔒 Also, (and maybe most importantly) this payrise is cost neutral, no extra budget has been allocated. Also HMRC staff also worked incredibly hard this past year. I know HMRC aren’t the most popular but SEISS and furlough were huge. +
CW racism. If academics or students get shunned and protested for saying black people are less intelligent, or that Jews all work for Israel - that's the free speech of those shunning / protesting them. No-one has a human right not to face these repercussions from other humans.
CW transphobia. If academics or students get mean looks or tutted for not learning how to address people politely - that is free speech. It is none of the Government's business (or the police's).
How to avoid (successful) accusations of defamation on Twitter. A few thoughts from someone who is NOT a libel lawyer, but does say very critical things about named individuals. 1/
2. When I tweet I aim to be sure A. I show the *facts* I am basing my *opinion* on. B. I have good reason to believe the *facts* are true. C. My opinion is reasonable based on the facts.
Some Leavers believe UK’s economic/political interests/qualities are fundamentally different from France & Germany. But this is so daft & so close to obvious extreme nationalism it never explained the EU’s existence for them 2/
But if UK isn’t fundamentally different from Germany & France. How to make sense of German / French EU membership? 3/
My opinion: Patel doesn’t care if immigration lawyers - or staff who work with us - get murdered. She will have been warned of the risks - she deliberately chooses to take them.
Barristers aren’t allowed - under our rules - to turn away clients because of what they’ve done. I’ve represented convicted murderers - and victims of terrible crimes.
Our job is to try & ensure law is upheld by the powerful: the courts & the state.
That’s why Patel hates us. +
My fellow lawyers & support staff - paralegals, secretaries, barristers clerks, cleaners, receptionists, IT staff, accountants, managers - we make sure justice works. For all of us.