Simon Cox Profile picture
16 Mar, 12 tweets, 4 min read
Usual evidence-free claim from Home Office.

Asylum-seekers are “pulled” to UK by the hope of ... overcrowded grotty “hotels” + £8 per week.

So they need to be put in new-built “centres” instead...
For 20 years U.K. Gov has “dispersed” asylum-seekers away from arrival points (London/SE England) to areas with cheaper housing - and to spread responsibility across all regions.

Patel will reverse that and build accommodation centres in SE England.
As @refugeecouncil explains - asylum-seekers don’t come here for the accommodation. thetimes.co.uk/article/917ebf…
Since 1994, UK Home Secs have repeatedly increased controls on asylum-seekers, always claiming that freedoms “pull”, and removing them will cut applications.

They’re insatiable. Ask them what *isn’t* a pull factor, please!
Asylum-seekers used to have right to work - but not for first six months then:

1994: ended access to income support

1999: when destitute asylum-seekers turned to local authorities, Home Office takes over provision of accommodation.
2000: Home Office runs asylum-seeker accommodation - voucher only system. Less than income support rates. People find they can’t get change or choose the cheapest shops.
2002: Gov bars asylum-seekers from supporting themselves by working

2005: new EU law requires UK to let asylum-seekers work if they’ve been waiting *a year* for a Home Office decision +
2010: Supreme Court orders Gov to give permission to work to asylum-seekers waiting a year for a *second* Home Office decision

Home Office responds by limiting permission to shortage occupations. Like surgeons. 🤦 +
2019: Home Office gives 10 year, billion £ contracts to Serco, Clearsprings, Mears to arrange asylum-seeker accommodation. asylummatters.org/wp-content/upl…
2019: While Serco avoid accommodating asylum-seekers by coming to pick them up from home when they’re at the doctors, Home Office tells High Court contracts are great deal because fixed charge to HO for each person - regardless of cost of accommodation + bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…
2020: pandemic. Home Office has tied in 3 big businesses to a duty to arrange accommodation at no extra cost to Gov *and* UK hotels are empty!

But Home Office tells them to take over a semi-abandoned barracks & training camp?

Why - except to create dangerous conditions? +
2021: 8 years of billion £ accomm contracts to run. But Home Office wants to spend public money building new “reception” centres ... because grotty vermin-ridden hotels, no work and hardly any money are“pull factor”?

How will they make living in a centres nastier than that? /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Cox

Simon Cox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonFRCox

7 Mar
RT🔒 HMRC: 13% over 3 years. HMRC staff have no contractual increments so people have been stuck at the bottom of the pay scale for 11 years +
RT 🔒 The maximum pay rise anyone has had in HMRC is 1% a year for the last 10 years. The department was rightly about to have a ton of equal pay claims. +
RT 🔒 Also, (and maybe most importantly) this payrise is cost neutral, no extra budget has been allocated. Also HMRC staff also worked incredibly hard this past year. I know HMRC aren’t the most popular but SEISS and furlough were huge. +
Read 5 tweets
1 Mar
UK Gov: "Unacceptable numbers of students & academics feel unable to express their lawful views without fear of repercussion"

Speech repercussions - social stigma & protest = none of Gov's business.

Criminal repercussions - violence vs individuals = police business, not Gov's
CW racism. If academics or students get shunned and protested for saying black people are less intelligent, or that Jews all work for Israel - that's the free speech of those shunning / protesting them. No-one has a human right not to face these repercussions from other humans.
CW transphobia. If academics or students get mean looks or tutted for not learning how to address people politely - that is free speech. It is none of the Government's business (or the police's).
Read 4 tweets
4 Jan
How to avoid (successful) accusations of defamation on Twitter. A few thoughts from someone who is NOT a libel lawyer, but does say very critical things about named individuals. 1/
1. Facts are different from opinions. But stating an opinion can imply a fact. kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs… Image
2. When I tweet I aim to be sure A. I show the *facts* I am basing my *opinion* on. B. I have good reason to believe the *facts* are true. C. My opinion is reasonable based on the facts.
Read 16 tweets
11 Dec 20
Leavers beginning to realise EU states see EU *fundamentally* differently from how Leavers see it. THREAD 1/9
Some Leavers believe UK’s economic/political interests/qualities are fundamentally different from France & Germany. But this is so daft & so close to obvious extreme nationalism it never explained the EU’s existence for them 2/
But if UK isn’t fundamentally different from Germany & France. How to make sense of German / French EU membership? 3/
Read 9 tweets
6 Oct 20
My opinion: Patel doesn’t care if immigration lawyers - or staff who work with us - get murdered. She will have been warned of the risks - she deliberately chooses to take them.

While Lord Chancellor, Attorney-General & Solicitor-General are silent. theguardian.com/global-develop…
Barristers aren’t allowed - under our rules - to turn away clients because of what they’ve done. I’ve represented convicted murderers - and victims of terrible crimes.

Our job is to try & ensure law is upheld by the powerful: the courts & the state.

That’s why Patel hates us. +
My fellow lawyers & support staff - paralegals, secretaries, barristers clerks, cleaners, receptionists, IT staff, accountants, managers - we make sure justice works. For all of us.

Our safety matters. +
Read 6 tweets
4 Oct 20
Today’s UK Gov asylum announcement. Let’s look at these proposals one-by-one in a thread 1/xx
Before we start, the backstory.

1. UK has had Tory Home Secs for 10 years. For 7: Theresa May, much smarter & more experienced pol than Patel.

2. UK Parliament approved 7 major Immigration Acts proposed by Home Office since 2000. Even though facts on ground didn’t change . 2/
Home Office staff already deal sceptically with all asylum claims
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!