Put another way, a digital rupee won’t be closed off from the global economy.
To the contrary, it will be more freely traded for other assets, domestic *and* foreign, than the current quasi-digital rupees held on bank ledgers.
Just compare USDC to Fedwire to see the future.
Setting up a digital rupee & thinking it can be air-gapped from the cryptoeconomy is like setting up a website & thinking it will only link to itself. 🙂
A website’s value, in part, comes from its links. A currency’s value, in larger part, comes from its links to other assets.
Every asset class is going on-chain —interest, loans, derivatives, art — a phenomenon you can witness in real-time at defipulse.com.
One of the main value propositions of a national digital currency will be an on-ramp to this financial internet. Like stablecoins 2.0.
The less things you can buy with a currency, the less valuable it is. The more it will be sold, and the less it will be held.
This will drive nations over time to permit more use cases for their national digital currencies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Video games somehow never fully broke through to the highest levels of culture, but NFTs did.
You might dispute the premise, as of course there are AAA games with serious plots and reviews. But the association with children playing and populist fun has sort of held games back.
NFT prices, by contrast, vault them into a kind of stratosphere. You can’t help but look up.
It may turn out that the presence of expensive verified NFTs is what distinguishes video games from virtual realities.
- Meme creators will make NFTs
- Timestamps give proof-of-first
- Memegen partially goes on-chain
- Memetic spread is more traceable
- Memers become millionaires
- Risky art becomes uncensorable & monetizable
- Art moves outside regime control
If you’re building this, reply here and/or DM. Space is moving fast, working products preferred! Suggestions:
1) Focus solely on memes, just like Giphy focused solely on gifs.
2) Clone as much existing memegen-type UX as you need, your initial innovation may be mostly backend.
They coincide exactly, because the private keys to *publish* online are the same as the private keys to *transact* online.
The same censorship-resistant blockchain design that prevents seizure of private property also prevents states & corporations from silencing your voice.
When you digitally sign and broadcast a transaction to a blockchain, it is sometimes referred to as *publishing* a transaction.
With the right design, this gives you pseudonymous, verifiable, uncensorable communication and transaction. Free speech and free markets in one stroke.
Why are blockchains easier to index than the web? They have a single canonical endpoint & all records are in the same format. Just need to keep chain tip fresh.
Far easier than crawling the menagerie of web pages.
Which is in turn easier than getting full Twitter API access!
Why can GPT-3 (or sequels) generate better-than-search results?
It also takes a search index as input (Common Crawl), but it doesn’t just present you 10 blue links.
It does the synthesis for you, and may eventually be able to do it offline just with learned parameters.
Disagree. By associating money with a private key, you give a literal incentive for every user to keep the key (a) private and (b) available at all times.
That’s the fundamental issue that previous PKI schemes didn’t solve at the individual level.