Last week a federal court delivered a swift blow to anti-abortion protesters in New York who argued that the FACE Act, which protects clinic workers and patients from violent protesters, violated their First Amendment rights.
What’s the FACE Act? We’re glad you asked!
THREAD:
The FACE Act—the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrance Act—is a federal law designed to protect access to abortion clinics.
It was signed into law in 1994 after a whole bunch of clinic violence. It prohibits the use of physical force or obstruction to interfere with anyone trying to access reproductive health services.
In short, it’s basically like: You can’t be intimidating patients outside abortion clinics. Seems reasonable enough! But you know those antis—so “pro-life” they will resort to violence over it.
Last week’s decision came in a case centered on protesters outside a Queens, New York, clinic but anti-abortion violence is rampant at clinics all over the country.
For example, in early March, 12 people, including 4 minors, were arrested in Tennessee after barricading themselves into the Carafem Clinic. It led to a shelter in place and road closures.
Behavior like this is, as @AngryBlackLady said, a good example of a pretty BLATANT violation of the FACE Act:
If that isn’t abhorrent enough, one arresting officer called the teenagers involved “two awesome kids.” As @LouClinicEscort pointed out, compare that with how police treat Black teens:
And we’ve long covered the anti-abortion violence at A Preferred Women’s Health Center in North Carolina, which is regularly under siege from protesters—including recently when they received a bomb threat: rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2021/0…
None of this comes as a surprise though. Antis have long used violence against providers and called it their First Amendment right. It’s kind of their thing.
Which is why the FACE Act and last week’s ruling are so crucial.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm @ja_davids taking over @RewireNewsGroup today to talk about endometriosis and infertility. I'm a health journalist and the co-founder of @endowarriors, which provides education and support to people with endo. I'm also writing a book about family planning.
I'm also the author of the upcoming So When Are You Having Kids, which will delve into everything you need to know about if, when, and how to become a parent.
I was diagnosed with endometriosis when I was 12. Growing up, I knew infertility was a possibility, but I thought IVF was foolproof so I didn't worry too much. When I was 24, I was diagnosed with premature ovarian failure, which doctors suspect came from having 7 endo surgeries.
Good morning! @ms_creilly here. Today is March 1, and you know what that means: It’s officially Endometriosis Awareness Month! As RNG’s legal fellow, and resident endo-haver, I’m doing a short thread to kick things off.
I was diagnosed with endometriosis over five years ago but like most people with endo, I lived with symptoms for almost a decade before that. Symptoms like excruciating periods, erratic bleeding, pain between periods, and gastrointestinal and urinary dysfunction.
Endometriosis is an incredibly common chronic illness that occurs when tissue similar to the lining of the uterus grows elsewhere in the body. It can cause pain, fatigue, infertility, and organ dysfunction. A lot more on that here: rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2020/1…
What’s up nerds! @AngryBlackLady here. Before we begin the SCOTUS live-tweet, let’s talk about what this ACA case is all about.
SEVERABILITY.
I don’t know if you really, but back when the Court said the ACA was A-OK, it did so because it said that the individual mandate was a tax and that the ACA was a valid exercise of Congress’s taxing power.
In 2017, when Congress passed the preposterously named Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it zeroed out the individual mandate which means no one had to pay a penalty for not getting insurance.
@KamalaHarris made history this week, becoming the first Black woman and first Indian American woman vice president of the United States. This is very big news!
As a presidential candidate, Harris was a strong pro-choice voice in what started out as a crowded field of candidates and offered up the idea of a federal pre-clearance system for abortion rights. What was this policy? We’re glad you asked!
Modeled after federal voting rights protections, states with a record of passing unconstitutional abortion restrictions would have to get the federal government’s OK first. The upside? Less a chance the worst abortion restrictions get passed and in front of a friendly Trump judge