Imagine a loved one dies in a high profile act of violence. The media narrative surrounding the tragedy begins w/ intense speculation RE racial motives, and this framing persists despite growing evidence that race is likely irrelevant.
How would you feel?
Who benefits from this?
Victims of last nights violence are individuals w/ families who love + will forever miss them. This is paramount.
Good intentions or not, always something a bit unseemly RE the determination to slot HUMANS into the contrived social artifice of racial identity. No exception here.
Media narratives about swelling anti-asian violence (like narratives about anti black police violence or *white supremacy*) capture imaginations + animate fears.
Less obvious these frameworks enhance our ability to relate to each other in healthy ways -- or even grok reality.
It's not about ignoring some categories of injustice, it's about regarding all injustices more accurately -- in their fullness. We can be constructive and grieve together without getting hijacked by partisan shaming, preconceptions, and various other political bullshit.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Our obsession with the word "Nigger" --in all its phonetic + textual variants, w/ its jumble of confused social norms-- is about pretense, not justice.
It's the worst kind of puritanical fetish. All but forbids appraisals of context; makes a virtue of mindless hypersensitivity.
Little wonder some have *graduated* to censuring journalists for, not use of the word, just having discussions RE 'what might constitute blasphemy.'
And these are people purportedly in the business of weighing words, ideas, and occurrences. defector.com/mike-pesca-sla…
The penalty @pescami received satisfies no defensible moral obligation. And my instincts tell me it does the opposite of making anyone safer.
My experience w/ Mike is limited, but I know him to be earnest, compassionate, thoughtful. The leadership @Slate has humiliated itself.
But why worry about trivialities like 'intent' or 'nuance' or the pretense of 'journalistic objectivity' -- Moral Clarity ought to make things much simpler. nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opi…
Of course, there are always a few pesky skeptics. But what do they know!? (stupid @MattWelch)
Bit of a lousy day. Thoughts are w/ my friend @AndyMillsNYT. Hope you'll read his moving + instructive resignation letter in full.
Andy didn't want to leave @nytimes.
Candidly, if NYT had half the integrity it purports to have, they wouldn't let him go... andymills.work/resignation
Mills' exit was precipitated by a determined, disingenuous smear campaign.
Odds are you don't know, that you know, Andy's work. During his tenure, he probably created more *value-per-min-worked* than any NYT staffer. Forging + shepherding many of their most successful projects.
But even with all his success, Andy has always seemed most proud of his unique ability to make his colleagues and their journalistic output truly shine.
During his time at NYT, he's personified the publication's very best traditions. That hasn't changed.
We must be honest about this:
We've endured yrs of escalating polarization and political violence. Full Stop.
Past 4 Years: Mass shootings targeting lawmakers. Scores dead amid waves of mass demonstrations + riots. Municipal bldgs torched. Fed outposts under months-long siege...
Appropriate to highlight Trump's degeneracy, but it mustn't come at the expense of acknowledging the dangerous context we need to be grappling with.
"Escalating crescendo" is redundant, confusing, and misleading. How can anyone be confident we're on the other side of ALL THIS!?
I'm afraid I see myopia + euphemism debasing media coverage in systematic ways.
Highlighting the virtue or deviance of different actors engaged in political violence. Taking great pains to frame one circumstance as 'mostly peaceful,' offering sweeping denunciations in another.
"Our past is one of slavery, racism, and injustice. Our systems were built to oppress people of color."
The history of humankind is a dense catalog of inhumanity, subjugation. The American project isn't the apogee of that awfulness; it's part of a sharp deviation from the mean.
Only a deep, lamentable ignorance explains @GavinNewsom's myopia.
America had a host of imperfections at her founding. Vestiges of what preceded it, not cruel innovations of the framers. In fact, it's the American vantage point that helps bring those defects into focus at all.
America's founding helped provide for the innovation + steady improvement of human liberty everywhere. A constitution that: limits govt, imperfectly balanced power among its parts, established a baseline for safeguarding minority rights, allows for its own 'perfecting' over time.
Trump talks like he has marbles in his mouth. It's not good.
Still, much easier for me to believe he's (inelegantly + inarticulately) saying the first (less insane) thing; especially since he's made nearly this same claim on many occasions.
But the frenzy is in full bloom...
Could also mean: “More mail-in-ballots are gonna be a problem. I keep warning you about this [rightly or wrongly]. We must encourage people to vote in person.”
Trump’s word salad is genuinely hard to parse. Journalists kinda have to form narrower questions + ask him to clarify.