The 2010 Russian WWII documentary, "Soviet Storm: World War II in the East" mentions near the start, if briefly, that "Stalin and Hitler had been allies" and "had reached an agreement." Both statements would be close to illegal in Russia now.
Of course they don't mention what the agreement was, nothing re dividing up Poland. No mention of the names Molotov or Ribbentrop. But Hitler and Stalin having been allies until Hitler invaded is an uncomfortable truth that Putin has been trying to re-bury for years.
I bet that line is gone if it's still available in Russia at all. Too tired for screencaps, but there are some excellent mustaches on some of the reenactment actors. And some of the documentary footage is probably Soviet archive exclusive.
It's also pretty straight about Stalin executing various Soviet military leaders after the war, several of whom had been captured early in the first Nazi offensive and had been POW for years. Nothing in-depth, but not the rehab Stalin has been enjoying in recent years.
No coincidence this doc starts with the German invasion of the USSR in June 1941. Obv a huge turning point, but also conveniently avoids mention of Stalin's invasion of Poland & Baltics, Finland, the Katyn massacre, etc. in 1940.
These days in Russia you'd think WWII started in June 1941, the way Americans think Dec 7, 1941. But at least Pearl Harbor really was the start of direct US participation. The Red Army had been fighting-as an aggressor, allied with Hitler-for almost 2 years before Barbarossa.
It's only December 1941 and I've already lost count of how many Soviet commanders were "arrested and later shot" for dereliction of duty, cowardice, suspected of collaboration, etc. Who were the highest ranking Allied officers to suffer such a fate? Court-martialed? Any?
In his book Deserters, Charles Glass estimated that "150,000 - 100,000 British and 50,000 Americans" deserted during WWII, which shocked me mostly because it had never occurred to me. Not an aspect of war that gets covered in most history books or by Hollywood.
Similarly, how many Soviet officers killed themselves instead of being captured by the Nazis. I guess if you knew that the Nazis would torture you and Stalin would kill you if you survived, might just get it over with.
This doc, after mentioning Stalin sent thanks to Lukin for the defense of Moscow after he was freed from a Nazi prison camp in 1945: "Stalin was not always so generous with those who had surrendered to the Germans." Yeah, not always.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Biden: Putin is a killer.
Putin: I know you are but what am I? Debate me!
Biden: Nah, you should debate a Russian opposition leader. Oh, that's right, they're dead or in jail. Because you're a killer.
Many have pointed out the irony of Putin's silly challenge, since he hasn't debated once in 21 yrs through 4 presidential "elections." It would be a joke, of course, but even putting a puppet or clown on the stage as an equal is way too risky a look. Mafia bosses don't debate.
Putin doing this in an attempt to get his swagger back shows that the "killer" remark stung. It's no "Vladimir, Poisoner of Underpants," but it's earthy. Putin craves legitimacy and respect. "Killer" is a common criminal. (Also why "Putin Vor! (thief)" is the best chant.)
1) Biden saying it himself and 2) his saying “Putin” instead of “Russia” or “Russian government.” Capo to capo, it matters. Putin has been dictator for 20 years and is the richest guy on the planet. He doesn’t care what Blinken says.
The reason we've harped on this trivial detail for years is not just to get Putin's attention. It's to focus on Putin the crime boss as the problem, not some old-timey clash of national interests or ideologies.
Putin and his gang don't care about that stuff at all, except for occasional "Make Russia Scary Again" propaganda. They use "Russia" as a way to deflect attention and absorb punishment that should go do their global criminal business. It's a construct.
More from the usual Russia Today angle, the same one that's been trotted out for a decade. "If you ban our hostile propaganda, we'll ban your free media." But it's a false choice and you don't have to fall for the transactional bullshit.
Putin and his gang crave access and legitimacy in the free world. Right now, they have it both ways. No media freedom at home, but paid Kremlin propaganda in the free world. One of many double standards that help modern dictators thrive.
"Dateline—Berlin, 1939: Germany complains that the Nazi News Network has been kicked off the radio in America, threatens to sue, ban Walter Winchell in Germany." Fuck off.
Find your Russian prison sentence! I got seven years for spreading gay propaganda. 🏳️🌈
Russia's internal security forces are now one of the largest and best-equipped paramilitaries in the world (better so than the actual Russian army), with a huge budget that has been increasing annually. Putin has had 20 years to prepare for this. There's no storming the castle.
Unless there's enough pressure from Putin's circle, pressure now nearly impossible to generate solely inside the country because they don't care about the country, to make Putin toxic to their wellbeing and profits, they'll shoot if they have to. Why not?
I'm all for discussing Navaly's personal politics, and disagree with him on much, but saying the free world shouldn't stand up for someone jailed and nearly murdered because he's not Bernie Gandhi Mandela is bullshit. He's risking his life fighting a mafia dictatorship.
Plus, Navaly's politics as we know them (he's never held office), not coincidentally, largely reflect mainstream Russia, which is far from liberal by Western standards. This is probably a more useful topic anyway, tbh, esp re Crimea.
He's ambitious, as was/is Khodorkovsky. He has positions (again, no formal platform) that would make him acceptable to Russians should he ever get an actual chance at power. That makes him less acceptable to Western liberals, but they're always hoping for a Yavlinsky, a Nemtsov.
In 2017, I pitched the idea of little testimonial videos of "what democracy means to me" at an early RDI board meeting. We had no operations and no budget, so hoping for virality seemed good. Now it's actually happened, and going viral, and it's awesome.
I still have the meeting notes, since I never delete anything. We thought it would be good to have people like Garry who lived (or were still living) under authoritarian regimes do it first, a "don't take democracy for granted" message. But it risked sounding preachy.
Now, when RDI actually has operations and a (small!) budget, it was the best of all worlds by having another "immigrant patriot" like Alexander Vindman lead the project. So many different videos coming in, from famous and regular folks, really great. #RenewDemocracy.