What democracy looks like: (short thread)

I just voted in Dutch general elections. I voted for one of the parties that wasn't VVD (sorry Mark Rutte).

If the Dutch used First Past the Post, Mark would've been able to rule the Netherlands however he wants - just look at this map
However, despite the fact that his party was the largest party in most councils, his party only actually got around 22 or 23% of the total vote.

So - his job now is to find other parties so that between them, they represent over 50% of the country's vote.

Which is fab - why?
Three reasons.

1️⃣ my vote didn't end up in the bin - instead it properly contributed to the number of seats of my chosen party

2️⃣ one party doesn't get freedom to dictate its entire manifesto on a 23% vote share

3️⃣ compromise and consensus building is built in
Is Dutch politics perfect? No definitely not. Do people still vote for politicians who have been shown to be involved in scandals and resigned only months ago? Yes. That's their right

But my vote was counted EXACTLY the same as theirs.

And THAT is democracy.

#makevotesmatter
P.S. the difference in how I feel after voting in NL or UK cannot be underestimated.

It makes me cry.

Once the Dutch cabinet is formed, I can say, yes it reflects how I and others voted.

In the UK, my vote (in non marginal) is shredded while others' are given superpowers.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Monique Hawkins

Monique Hawkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @monlouhawk

18 Oct 20
The @the3million letter writing campaign to your MPs has been amazing this week! We thought the House of Lords letter writing was awesome but almost three times as many of you have written to MPs so far.

A few reflections so far…

deniedmybackup.org/contact-your-mp
First and most important, it is working!

Whatever happens in the House of Commons debate (and we can take a guess, given how the Govt whips MPs to vote), the message IS getting through and MPs ARE beginning to question the digital-only status.

We are winning the argument.
One Conservative MP mentioned the standard soundbites then added "However I do understand the predicament you have that you cannot print the evidence and digital proof cannot always be accessed"
Read 11 tweets
15 Oct 20
While I welcome the promises in this article towards those who don't apply for status under the EU settlement scheme, because they are considered to have a "reasonable grounds" (it mentions example of 8-yr old 'looked-after' child), I am very confused. 1/
theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
In the article, @AlbertoCostaMP says that "the minister [@kevin_j_foster] has assured parliament that EU nationals who fail to apply by the grace period deadline of 30 June will remain legally here if they have a reasonable excuse".

I would be overjoyed if that were true. 2/
After all, it is one of the problems that @the3million has been highlighting in the absence of a declaratory status. (see 'Interim Status' on page 2 of our briefing t3m.org.uk/t3m_SafeSettle…).

Amendment 3 on the Immigration Bill seeks to address this (@childrensociety) 3/
Read 6 tweets
4 Oct 20
EU citizens will have to rely on a digital-only status to prove their rights after June next year.

To me, it is sheer common sense that a physical backup is needed, because digital - while lovely when it works - doesn't always work.

I've been arguing this from...
... first principles for almost two years now.

We know large computer systems often fail - in general.

But recently, the list of just Government IT failures have been staggering.

Let me list a few, then tell me that EU citizens don't need a physical backup of their status.
Let's first just look at the passage of the immigration bill through parliament. (I've chosen that bill because there's an amendment on it, to give us physical proof of status, to be debated and voted on tomorrow, Monday 5th October).
Read 9 tweets
30 Sep 20
My lovely (widowed) mum lives in the Netherlands. If she needs my help in future, I want to be able to move and look after her.

If I had JUST UNTIL MARCH 2022 to be able to make that move and bring my British husband, I would be in a total panic.

Luckily, the Dutch government..
.. recognises how unfair that would be, given that I moved to the UK under EU free movement.

So they've clearly stated that I will keep that right (to bring my British husband to NL) for my lifetime.

The UK government on the other hand, is not being so kind to its own citizens.
They are ripping that right away from British citizens who, under EU free movement had legitimate expectation they could return to the UK in future with their family.

Why are they doing this?

It's genuinely beyond me. We're talking a finite group of people.

The excuse given is
Read 5 tweets
14 Sep 20
Except I can't watch it live because Parliament TV has had a glitch.

If that doesn't prove individuals need to have a physical backup proof of settled status I don't know what does.

Digital is great - WHEN IT WORKS.
A backup is needed - FOR WHEN IT DOESN'T

#DeniedMyBackup
Last week during the debate the email scheme for peers to request speaking turns went down as well.

I'll say it again - @the3million is not opposing digital status.

We're only asking for a physical BACKUP for situations and digitally excluded people for whom it doesn't work.
Read 4 tweets
18 Aug 20
I feel this otherwise excellent article misses the point entirely when it says "One of the strengths of the Westminster parliamentary system is that it occasionally produces governments with real power to effect change, should they try to enact it." 1/ theatlantic.com/international/…
This is hoping for two things to come along at once - a party with a good majority and a uniquely talented leader.

And at the same time expecting that party to act in the UK's long term interest, whereas the UK's parliamentary system uniquely rewards short termism. 2/
The major difference between the systems of the US / UK on the one hand, and Germany and the Netherlands on the other, is the difference between winner-takes-all systems, and cooperate & compromise systems.

3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!