Jesus Christ are people actually saying I should watch the Snyder Cut?
I would like to be wrong. There really is no film I would rather watch than a decent Justice League. But my idea of what is decent does not involve them saying fuck and snapping people's necks.
Fuck it, I'm clearly going to give it a go. I can tell I've already decided and am merely pretending otherwise to myself.
Ok so we did this. It's improved I guess, but the positive reviews completely baffle me.
I wish I felt otherwise. It makes me happy that comic nerds can create enough noise that they secure a big money project they're passionate about. And they clearly grew up reading the same books as me. But it just seems such a travesty.
Who are these people? Batman is a gun-toting team-builder. What the fuck? That's wrong in every way there is to be wrong about him. Aquaman is basically a frat boy. Superman seems almost sadistic in his power. Only Wonder Woman feels remotely like herself.
The word that keeps playing in my head is: badass. I never really liked that word. But it seems to define every aspect of this. Everything happens because it's badass.
But there is really no understanding of the characters. It's incomprehensible to me how anyone could bring themselves to care about these people.
It feels like a terribly long, terribly boring, vacuous, dark and gritty CGI slugfest. I do hope that's an end to it now. There's something fundamentally quite horrible about it all that I would like to see go away.
You've basically gone from this to this.
And from this to this.
And I'm sure it feels terribly grown up. I'm sure it's very badass indeed. But it just comes across as deeply childish.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alexi McCammond loses her job at Teen Vogue because of tweets she sent when she was 17. BBC Breakfast presenters told to apologise for failing to show sufficient respect for the flag. Censorship is demonstrably out of control on right and left politics.co.uk/comment/2021/0…
The usual kickback against this is that it's both-sides-ism. But sometimes both sides of political disputes do have similar problems and that does not become irrelevant because Trump happened to shat out his mouth that one time.
We're trapped in a situation where parts of left insist their censorship does not exist, or should be redefined as harmless, while parts of the right can only conceive of censorship as something the left do.
This is a law enforcing the silencing of protestors. But the most alarming thing about it was not its provisions. It was the silence from ministers about what it contained and the silence from Tory backbenchers about their duty to scrutinise it.
I keep thinking back to this thing that a Hungarian journalist told me about living under Orban. That the scariest part was when the silence came - when the newspapers stopped criticising and the protests stopped happening. That's when you knew you were fucked good and proper.
Day two of the anti-protest bill debate is going to start in about 15mins. For some unfathomable reason which I now deeply regret, I have committed to live tweeting it.
If you're not interested in the police, crime, sentencing and courts bill: mute this thread. Seriously. I'm like the haggard old man at the gas station at the start of a horror movie, telling the kids not to go to the cabin the woods.
This is yesterday's thread from the debate, if you missed the excitement of watching a country's moral capacity degrade in real time.
The police bill "may create uncertainty by giving far too much discretion to the police in determining this balance, and far too much power to the executive to change the law by decree if it chooses" conservativehome.com/platform/2021/…
This is a very interesting joint piece by Brexiter Steve Baker & Remainer Dominic Grieve for ConHome. It may encourage some Tories to take a closer look at the bill they have been defending.
But it ends with a very one-the-one-hand-and-on-the-other section which pretty much sets the battle for committee stage. Basically saying to MPs: vote it through for now and we'll see if we can fix the troublesome bits as it progresses.
Right, you know that shit is fucked up because I'm going to do a live thread of the Commons debate.
If you are not interested in the policing bill, please mute this thread now, because I suspect it's going to be very long.
We've got Priti Patel up in the Commons at 3:30pm to make a statement about the police attack on the vigil over the weekend. Then the debate on the policing bill starts. It'll go on until 10pm, then restart again tomorrow, when there'll be a vote.
Quick thread on an aspect of the policing bill which has been under-discussed: the provisions on trespass. This section targets Gypsies and Travellers.
They are groups who very few people give a damn about and have been targeted by governments throughout the centuries. It is happening again now.
It's in Part 4 of the bill, which amends Part 5 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. Both relevant sections here: