There was a claim made in today's exec meeting that Vanita Gupta has the "potential of being the most dangerous nominee to the Department of Justice." Yet she has broad support from law enforcement and conservatives.
Why do Republicans keep attacking qualified women of color?
If the fear is "defund the police," Vanita Gupta does NOT support defunding the police. But you know what does? Voting against the state and local aid in the American Rescue Plan, which included support for law enforcement. And who voted against the ARP? Every Senate Republican.
Take it from the FOP’s executive director, Jim Pasco: “You know what defunding the police is? Holding up the state and local aid bill, the COVID package. That’s de-facto defunding the police. A vote against that legislation is a vote to defund the police.”
Gupta has been widely praised by conservatives for her “longstanding history of working across partisan lines to promote equality and justice in our legal system.” It’s time to #ConfirmGupta
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Republicans: Vanita Gupta wants to defund the police.
Wrong. In fact, Gupta stated unequivocally she opposes defunding the police. Plus, Gupta’s nomination has been praised by virtually every major law enforcement organization in the country.
Houston Chief of Police Art Acevedo said during a conference call that “It gets a little old: Elected officials stand for the blue, they back the blue... Well, guess what? There is unanimous support [for Vanita Gupta] from all the major law enforcement groups in this country.”
The Fraternal Order of Police wrote that Ms. Gupta, “always worked with us to find common ground even when that seemed impossible.”
This is a debunked and hypocritical talking point. Republicans falsely claim that Judge Garland refused to answer all of their nearly 850 questions, but were ok with former AG Barr evading question after question posed by Democrats AND Republicans. Let's take a look (THREAD)
Remember when AG Barr said he wouldn’t comment about the Zero Tolerance Initiative that drove the Trump family separation policy because he didn’t know all its details?
Remember when AG Barr was asked what constitutes a high crime and misdemeanor under the Constitution and replied that he had “not studied” the question?