I mean, sure. But more importantly, is there *any* threshold for someone to be able to genuinely and sincerely apologize for past mistakes, especially as a teenager–and yes, that includes saying racist things–and be able to be accepted back into society?
The problem with "never tweet" is that it reveals the problem is just producing evidence of immaturity that all of us go through at some point but many–hopefully most–grow out of.
You probably said things you wish you hadn't as a teenager. I sure did. But should the consequences really be worse only because there's Twitter now?
Why have a society where saying sorry and growing from mistakes just isn't enough–and nothing is?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the past 150 years, the filibuster was routinely used on anything touching civil rights. But go back to the beginning and look at today's claims that the filibuster (a word that, of course, did not yet exist until the mid-19th century) was somehow intrinsic to the Senate:
The people who were actually there at the beginning, even before the Constitution, knew empowering the minority to delay, disrupt, and effectively veto the majority was a recipe for disaster. From Robert Byrd's lectures on the history of the Senate:
Lo and behold, THE VERY FIRST SENATE that sat in 1789 had rules to prevent unlimited debate!
I think the most remarkable thing about this whole debate is not conservative grandstanders and media reading from still-to-be-published Seuss books while studious ignoring the ones being taken out of print. Or the conflation of copyright owner choices with public censorship.
It's the absence of libraries in these discussions. Public libraries, academic libraries–these books are not locked up. They are still there. And if you're afraid about your libraries losing books, fund them better.
I'll spare you the whole text but it's about as embarrassing and juvenile as you'd expect whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Also the suggestion that the NEH and NEA should take $14 million each from their paltry $167 million budgets to build statues instead of supporting genuine arts and scholarship is damning.
Infrastructure week has become a joke but the reality is we’ve squandered a decade of historically cheap financing because free market ideologues in the Republican party don’t believe in public goods or that government can help people.
Fwiw, I love the DC Metro. I always have. I love the architecture, the convenience, the easy access to downtown from the MD and VA suburbs, the overall cleanliness (really!), the environmental benefit over driving, & the reliability (overheated summer tracks notwithstanding).
Very true thread. Depending on the institution and program, an ABD candidate with few publications but stellar dissertation chapters and a lot of promise can be more appealing than a candidate with a demonstrated publishing record. Also....
I think it is under-discussed how search committees will weigh, however informally, whether a candidate is likely to stay at their institution or jump ship if given the opportunity.
It's a totally unfair thing to consider. But people do it.
And if you think you'll never get to make another higher, gaming this out is rational (if still liable to lead you to the wrong choice).