Air pollution is a dead end strategy for LTN criticism.

Air pollution fear mongering is used to reduce the mobility of people under the guise of 'protecting' them.

The evidence for those claims is extremely weak, and is produced by the nexus of academia and activism.
This doesn't help anyone navigate the issues.

All it says is ban all cars everywhere.

It takes no look at the historical air quality or mortality/disease data.

And it makes no defence of affordable mobility.
Scaremongering is scaremongering.

Scepticism and perspective is needed to digest these seemingly shocking figures.

Often seemingly worrying rises in problems attributed to things like air pollution are caused by improved conditions.

For e.g., increased exposure to fossil-fuel air pollution is coincident in some places with radical declines in infant mortality -- thanks to increased incomes & better living standards. Academics play fast-and-loose with the facts for political ends, too.
A look at historical mortality stats reveals an extremely stark contrast with today. There is zero evidence of what is presented by activists and politicians as a growing 'crisis'. It's exactly the opposite. Dead children were not news in the first half of the C20th.
What remains by far the biggest determinant of health outcomes in the UK is wealth. Wealth does not correlate to exposure to air pollution, unless you squint hard when you look at the data. It does correlate to quality of housing.
You can see how rare what we're talking about is. Image
In full context of mortality stats... Image
Today's children compared to the boomers' exposure to risks... Image
Compare those figures to the number of deaths attributed to respiratory diseases registered in 1911! ImageImage
(Forgot to mention there was also the data from 1901 in the last tweet).

Death was the norm. The point being that you wouldn't just have heard of someone who didn't make it to adulthood -- it was normal to have a family member who did not survive.
Yet campaigners pretend that things have got worse in the 'modern' era -- since mass private transport and flight and so on.

The opposite is true.

Things are far, far, far better today. The 'progress' advocated by activists and academics is in fact regression.
The best thing that a young working class family living in London can have is a car.

It lets them get around quickly, to get good food, to see family and friends, to sport clubs and exercise, and for days out in the country/seaside -- all at low cost.
Air pollution scare mongering will constrain working class people to their homes/boroughs and cities. It raises barriers and horizons.

That is though the point of environmentalism: to sustain the natural order, in which plebs know their place.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

21 Mar
#Oxford. This is your green Utopia. This is what you have been voting for, for years, from the City and County councils, for Lab/Con/LibDem/Green. This is what it means. This is the planet-saving future you demanded. Happy now? #LTNs
These are the faces of Oxford West and Oxford East. ImageImage
You get what you vote for, I guess.

The same city produced Caroline Lucas, George Monbiot, and quite a few others.

There's something in the water, maybe.
Read 4 tweets
10 Mar
Me in @spikedonline on why the government cannot explain its climate 'plan', why MPs are just as culpable as the government for policy failure, and why none of them can admit what their climate ambitions really are.

spiked-online.com/2021/03/10/com…
Here is the summary of the Public Accounts Committee report that found the government 'has no plan'.

The highlighted text is extraordinary.

"Government has not yet properly engaged with the public on the substantial behaviour changes that achieving net zero will require."
The PAC MPs' criticism of the government is that the government is insufficiently draconian.

Much as there was no opposition to the policies, and of the government giving itself ever greater powers over the last year, the PAC wants the government to inflict more hardship.
Read 18 tweets
8 Mar
Whut? Take it seriously? Who is this guy?
I'm going back to bed. I think I woke up in the wrong reality.
There's a number of Youtube channels about guys building massive boats in their backyards. Some wood, some steel. I could watch them all day. I'd love to do that -- build a ship. Politics is just nuts.
Read 4 tweets
7 Mar
If only the government was more powerful, it would make fewer mistakes.
We can know this because governments with absolute power have many fewer critics.
Read 5 tweets
7 Mar
Did anyone else notice the government 'let the virus rage'?

He's a bizarre political fantasist. He invents stories that either require the state to acquire new powers, or that make his political enemies culpable for things that have not happened.

Why would a man just a few years south of his 60th birthday and having only recently recovered from cancer treatment, and having been locked down for a year, feel a bit under the weather?

The only answer can be the government's DELIBERATE incompetence... Image
You won't struggle to find me hating the government.

But that means I want less of it.

George simultaneously wants FAR more government, but then constantly find that the government are just an evil bunch of bastards, who literally profit from things like his 'long covid'.
Read 8 tweets
26 Feb
Climate alarmism is dead, long live climate alarmism!

Why do they ALWAYS demand more poison as remedy?

junkscience.com/2021/02/study-…
The above is a *MUST-READ* blog post - and read the study, too.
Alarmists are constantly fighting against the excesses of their own desire for prognostications.

Doomsday predictions pass, not just without event, but to the OPPOSITE of what they predicted: people being better off, not killed in catastrophes.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!