THREAD: Highlights of Chinese remarks at the US-China meeting that happened in Alaska. The quoted speakers are Director of the Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs Yang Jiechi and State Councilor/Foreign Minister Wang Yi. [Minor editing to fit tweets]

(1/?)
YANG: "The wars in this world are launched by some other countries, which have resulted in massive casualties(...) We don't believe in invading through the use of force, or to topple other regimes through various means, or to massacre the people of other countries"
YANG: "So we believe that it is important for the United States to change its own image and to stop advancing its own democracy in the rest of the world. Many people within the United States actually have little confidence in the democracy of the United States"
YANG: "The problem is that the United States has exercised long-arm jurisdiction and suppression and overstretched the national security through the use of force or financial hegemony(...) and has also been persuading some countries to launch attacks on China."
YANG: "On human rights, we hope that the United States will do better on human rights(...) The challenges facing the United States in human rights are deep-seated. They did not just emerge over the past four years, such as Black Lives Matter. It did not come up only recently."
YANG: "So the way we see the relationship with the United States is as President Xi Jinping has said– that is, we hope to see no confrontation, no conflict, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation with the United States."
YANG: "On cyber attacks, let me say that whether it’s the ability to launch cyber attacks or the technologies that could be deployed, the United States is the champion in this regard. You can’t blame this problem on somebody else."
YANG: "The United States itself does not represent international public opinion, and neither does the Western world. Whether judged by population scale or the trend of the world, the Western world does not represent the global public opinion."
YANG: "Because, Mr. Secretary and NSA Sullivan, you have delivered some quite different opening remarks, mine will be slightly different as well."
WANG: "China urges the U.S. side to fully abandon the hegemonic practice of willfully interfering in China’s internal affairs(...) in particular, on the 17th of March, the United States escalated its so-called sanctions on China regarding Hong Kong."
WANG: "We wonder if this is a decision made by the US to try to gain some advantage in dealing with China, but certainly this is miscalculated and only reflects the vulnerability and weakness inside the US. And this will not shake China’s position or resolve on those issues."
*Some more remarks by Wang, and after this point there was a break. A question was asked off-mic and Wang makes some defiant remarks 👇*

WANG: "The Chinese side felt compelled to make this speech because of the tone of the U.S. side. "
WANG: "So was this carefully all planned and was it carefully orchestrated with all the preparations in place? Is that the way that you had hoped to conduct this dialogue?"
WANG: "So let me say the US does not have the qualification to say that it wants to speak to China from a position of strength. The US side was not even qualified to say such things even 20 years or 30 years back, because this is not the way to deal with the Chinese people."
WANG: "So have the Chinese people not suffered enough in the past from the foreign countries?"
WANG: "Well, as long as China’s system is right with the wisdom of the Chinese people, there is no way to strangle China.

Our history will show that one can only cause damages to himself if he wants to strangle or suppress the Chinese people." 👀

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Izak Novák

Izak Novák Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @izak_novak

4 Apr
You didn't use Western sources? Really? Let's see about that. In this video, Vaush cited the WSJ: (1/9) Image
The Jamestown Foundation, "a Washington, D.C.-based conservative defense policy think tank.[2] Founded in 1984 as a platform to support Soviet defectors" (2/9) Image
Business Insider, "an American financial and business news website founded in 2007. Since 2015, a majority stake in Business Insider's parent company Insider Inc. has been owned by the German publishing house Axel Springer." (3/9) Image
Read 9 tweets
28 Jul 20
I'm truly terrified by how sophisticated, hegemonic and effective anti-China propaganda has become. The English speaking world has been so relentlessly blanketed in the two "Big Lies" about China (HK/Xinjiang) and many small lies, that they've created an alternate reality.
Trying to have a conversation with someone who only gets their information about China from the NYT or Reddit is borderline impossible. This is how the propaganda works: it becomes self-perpetuating and self-reinforcing.
First, you establish the baseline lie: "China is oppressing Xinjiang" Then, anything that has to do with Xinjiang becomes toxic because "that's where China is oppressing people" so we end up with the mask story: "your masks are made by oppressed people in XJ"
Read 10 tweets
25 May 20
Cheng Enfu, leading Marxist intellectual in China from CASS, wrote an article in 2012 that lays out competing political currents in China and the dominant current in the CPC that he calls "Innovative Marxism":

cpim.org/sites/default/…
Key points on his definition of Innovative Marxism:

- Insists on the guiding position of Marxism in China
- Adheres to the leadership of the political party of the working class in China
- Insists on the dominant position of public ownership of the means of production in China
"Innovative Marxism believes that China must adhere to the socialist nature and principle, aiming at emancipating and developing productive forces, while eliminating exploitation and polarization so as to achieve common prosperity, and ultimately realizing communism (...)
Read 13 tweets
25 Apr 20
Is China trying to build hegemony? Is it imperialist? No, and any comparison to US hegemony or imperialism requires an immense amount of mental gymnastics especially when China-Global South relations are so strong and views of China are so positive. Additionally,
When we look at the structure of US imperialism we have to understand its basis in a few things:
-The concentration of private financial capitalism overseeing private monopolies (China has neither)
-Settler colonialism (not China)
-Fascist white supremacy (not China)
The fake left, boosted by the CIA and adjacent media, have worked tirelessly for decades to try to paint China as the mirror image of the US: "It's just capitalism", they're "Han supremacist" or "they're colonizing Africa" etc. All of this is baseless projection.
Read 7 tweets
17 Apr 20
The US is waging a hybrid war against China to contain, balkanize and economically sabotage it. US imperialism will not allow a socialist country to overtake it. This war is escalating and we need to understand it. Here's my analysis:

izaknovak.wordpress.com/2020/04/17/62/
"Much like how the early Communist Party of China escaped encirclement by the KMT via the Long March, China is today faced with the prospect of a “New Long March” against US imperialism.
Not only is China attempting to build the necessary material base for socialism, but to make it strong enough to withstanding the competing pressures of existing capitalist rivals.
Read 22 tweets
23 Mar 20
They are going to normalize the virus and make us all risk our lives to keep capitalism moving and that surplus value flowing.

The narrative is already being prepared, be ready for this:
"Old people and at-risk people stay home, the rest go back to work."

Theyre not going to let capitalism grind to a halt, and are starting to realize relief packages could undo decades of class warfare.

The capitalist class panic is setting in and they are gonna normalize it.
I knew as soon as I read what was being considered in the relief packages- this will not be allowed to last. Suspension of evictions, cash payments, paid leave... These were all withheld as class warfare tools. No way they're going to let that cat out of the bag so easily.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!