Still, none of the modern wave of DC movies are as good as the “Dark Knight” trilogy, “Mask of the Phantasm”, “Batman Returns” or even “Batman ‘66.”
But who knows, I freely admit that they might when given time to settle. I’m a firm believer in the idea of letting things settle.
Indeed, I suspect “Birds of Prey” might get bumped up from “good” to “great” with another rewatch or two.
Having seen it a couple of times now, it is immensely rewatchable.
Incidentally, looking at that ranking of the modern DC films, it's proportionately similar to how I'd rank the MCU - about five great films, five more good films.
Instead of a large number of "interesting" and "bad", there's a mess of "solid" and "functional, but kinda dull."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just following on from that discussion of Zack Snyder’s “Justice League”, some thoughts that were too nerdy and esoteric for the article.
In terms of positioning “Justice League” as a reconstruction, it’s obvious even looking at the comics from which it draws.
“Batman v. Superman” drew very heavily from two of the biggest “dark age of comics” stories, and hinted at a third.
A lot of the Old Batman Versus Institutionally Challenged Superman stuff comes from Frank Miller’s “The Dark Knight Returns”, which ushered in “the dark age.”
The climax of the film is lifted directly from the mid-nineties event “The Death of Superman”, which involved - you guessed it - the death of Superman and the introduction of Doomsday.
It was the peak of the nineties “darker and edgier” era, and the height of comics speculation.
It’s... fine. Big, messy, sprawling, sweeping, exposition-laden, indulgent, mythic. I reviewed it here for @EscapistMag.
WATCH:
As #ZackSnydersJusticeLeague is a four-hour film, and because I am somebody who has lots of thoughts about regular-length movies anyway, I wrote more about it.
Notably, however you feel about Snyder, the restoration of his vision should be celebrated.
What’s interesting about Snyder’s work on the DCEU, from “Man of Steel” to The #SnyderCut, is that it exists in conversation with the characters’ history.
In particular, Richard Donner and Richard Lester’s “Superman II” is a cornerstone of the DCEU.
The victims of racism don’t owe the public the performance of their trauma. Anyone who has been bullied knows the impulse not to show a bully your tears.
But anybody who has discussed, say, the racist abuse of Kelly Marie Tran has inevitably seen her silence used as validation.
“If the racism really bothered this actor, how come they never actually explicitly talked about it? Fandom doesn’t have a problem.”
Ignoring that they shouldn’t have to, Katie Leung explains one very logical reason why a victim of racist abuse might not publicly talk about it.
Here I joke, and suggest it’s a real shame they haven’t made any “Star Wars” since, as there’s a real gap in the market.
“You did it, Poe. Now get your squad back here so we can get out of this place.”
“No, General... We can do this.”
I can’t imagine how this story about a hotshot arrogant roguish pilot who needs to learn to listen to women - a recurring motif in the film - could ruffle feathers.
What’s interesting about the Poe storythread in “The Last Jedi” is that it becomes fundamentally self-proving.
In that it’s about the sort of arrogance of these sorts narratively-favoured roguish protagonists, and how fans and narratives fetishise that.
To get a sense of why so many blockbuster movies are structured like that, look at how fans react to a blockbuster with actual characterisation.
Compare the reaction to the use of Luke Skywalker as a person in “The Last Jedi” to his use as a plot function in “The Mandalorian.”
Because having a character make choices - rather than just having a plot “happen” to them - risks alienating all those fans who have invested in their own head canon version of the character and treat any contradiction as heresy.