Lots of good aspects to the design worthy of support, but the absence of street trees, despite consistent public support for their inclusion, is very disappointing.
But perhaps most importantly, are street trees' contributions to improving and ameliorating the worst impacts of climate change.
Street trees create carbon sinks by removing CO2, attenuate heavy rains & flooding and moderate temperatures by evaporating water, reflecting sunlight & providing shade, all helping to adapt the immediate environment for the effects of rapid climate change.
George Street's landscape design needs to anticipate the predicted future wetter winters, drier hotter summers & increasing extreme heatwaves.
By 2050 (when the new public realm will be celebrating its 25th anniversary), Edinburgh's climate is predicted to resemble Paris.
And by the end of the century, the climate could be closer to Barcelona (both cities where street trees are considered essential).
In this context, the current soft landscaping proposals for George Street (shrubs in raised planters & clipped hedges) are not remotely good enough.
Chinese proverb: The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.
If you support street trees on George Street then make your views known while you still can.
Whatever your views on the project, this is a last chance to have your say.
There's a great deal to admire & support in the current proposals - pedestrian priority, increased accessibility, largely traffic-free, active travel infra, removal of street clutter, high-quality materials, etc.
It's a bold & transformative plan in nearly every way with one glaring exception - the soft landscaping/street greening, which is underwhelming to say the least, under-scaled, incongruous & not designed to meet the environmental needs of future generations.
This is the last week to respond to the consultation on the George Street proposals.
Despite overwhelming public support & the Council's obligations on climate change & tree-planting, the street trees from previous proposals have been inexplicably removed.
Why?
The technical challenge of excavating tree pits in an historic city centre site shouldn't be underestimated but, as other cities have repeatedly demonstrated, the problem is definitely surmountable.
The only real obstacle is the opposition of 'stakeholders' such as Edinburgh World Heritage & the Cockburn Association. They argue that street trees were not part of James Craig's original vision for the First New Town and, of course, that's perfectly true.
Edinburgh is rightly proud of its green credentials, with more trees per head than any other UK city & regularly winning 'greenest' accolades. But there's one league table where it languishes at the bottom, and that's street trees.
Edinburgh has only ~8,500 street trees (a 22% decline since the 1990s) & barely 1% of its urban tree total. Similarly-sized Sheffield has ~36,000.
CEC recognises this & has prioritised street tree planting, yet there are still no trees in the current George Street redesign.
Historical perspective:
Systematic street tree planting in UK cities began in the 1860s, but Edinburgh's early progress was painfully slow & largely driven by the Cockburn Association, which encouraged the Council to plant more streets with trees with only limited success.
If you want to see street trees as part of the redesigned George Street then the George Street 2025 consultation (runs until 26th March) is the last chance to make it happen.
Suggest them as an additional feature on Question 5.