Whatever your views on the project, this is a last chance to have your say.
There's a great deal to admire & support in the current proposals - pedestrian priority, increased accessibility, largely traffic-free, active travel infra, removal of street clutter, high-quality materials, etc.
It's a bold & transformative plan in nearly every way with one glaring exception - the soft landscaping/street greening, which is underwhelming to say the least, under-scaled, incongruous & not designed to meet the environmental needs of future generations.
Due to the objection of heritage groups, the street trees included in the 2018 concept plan have been removed. That design was developed with those same stakeholders so why they've been excluded this time is unclear, especially since in the interim...
...the Council has declared a Climate Emergency & joined the Million Tree City movement, as well as the previous consultation finding 76% of the public were in favour of street trees on George Street, with 56% of respondents 'strongly' in favour.
Current landscaping proposals of shrubs in planters & clipped hedges will do nothing to combat & adapt the immediate environment to the impacts of climate change & fail to deliver the many environmental, cultural, social, health, aesthetic & economic benefits of street trees.
George Street is the flagship project for the wider Edinburgh City Centre Transformation. Adopting a timid landscaping approach here will set a depressing precedent elsewhere. If street trees cannot be accommodated within Edinburgh's widest & grandest street then where can they?
This is the last week to respond to the consultation on the George Street proposals.
Despite overwhelming public support & the Council's obligations on climate change & tree-planting, the street trees from previous proposals have been inexplicably removed.
Why?
The technical challenge of excavating tree pits in an historic city centre site shouldn't be underestimated but, as other cities have repeatedly demonstrated, the problem is definitely surmountable.
The only real obstacle is the opposition of 'stakeholders' such as Edinburgh World Heritage & the Cockburn Association. They argue that street trees were not part of James Craig's original vision for the First New Town and, of course, that's perfectly true.
Lots of good aspects to the design worthy of support, but the absence of street trees, despite consistent public support for their inclusion, is very disappointing.
Edinburgh is rightly proud of its green credentials, with more trees per head than any other UK city & regularly winning 'greenest' accolades. But there's one league table where it languishes at the bottom, and that's street trees.
Edinburgh has only ~8,500 street trees (a 22% decline since the 1990s) & barely 1% of its urban tree total. Similarly-sized Sheffield has ~36,000.
CEC recognises this & has prioritised street tree planting, yet there are still no trees in the current George Street redesign.
Historical perspective:
Systematic street tree planting in UK cities began in the 1860s, but Edinburgh's early progress was painfully slow & largely driven by the Cockburn Association, which encouraged the Council to plant more streets with trees with only limited success.
If you want to see street trees as part of the redesigned George Street then the George Street 2025 consultation (runs until 26th March) is the last chance to make it happen.
Suggest them as an additional feature on Question 5.