2/It might seem, at first glance, like U.S. decarbonization is merely a symbolic moral gesture. After all, we're forecast to produce only 5% of global emissions this century.
Even eliminating all of that would be a drop in the bucket, right?
3/It's incredibly unfair that the U.S. was able to grow and develop for a century while belching carbon into the air, but now -- through the pure hard unyielding truths of physics -- developing Asia is going to have to do most of the work of decarbonization.
4/This isn't about morality; it's about physics. Sure, we have higher per capita emissions, but the climate doesn't give a rat's ass about per capita emissions. It does not care one jot nor one tittle. Not a single iota or crumb does it care.
5/So if the world is to be saved, developing Asia must decarbonize. This is simply a physical fact.
But if decarbonization threatens Asian countries' growth, they will simply refuse to do it.
14/The real problem here is China. Unlike, India, China already has a vast existing base of installed coal plants, meaning renewables have to be much cheaper than EXISTING coal to get them to switch.
15/And China's coal industry is politically very powerful.
17/The ONLY way the U.S. can get China to decarbonize is to keep driving down the price of renewables until China decarbonizes out of pure economic self-interest.
Which means we have to install renewables at very high rates, very soon!
18/Note that this means that carbon taxes, which are a diffuse policy that also limits economic growth, are of limited use. China isn't going to copy our carbon tax. And slower growth will simply tell the developing world that decarbonization hurts the economy.
19/And note that degrowth is particularly insane in the context of the global emissions problem.
If we teach countries like China that they have to choose between growth and decarbonization, they will NOT decarbonize.
Cash benefits are a complement to the dignity of work, not a substitute.
There's nothing dignified about taking a crappy survival job because you can't afford to take some time to look for a good one or go back to school to get a better one.
There's nothing dignified about working yourself to the bone only to have to stretch your paycheck to the end of the month because you can just barely afford rent and food.
Folks, Substack isn't a network-effect platform. I use it because I am lazy. You can pretty easily set up a blog, an email newsletter, and subscription payments yourself. It's not a public square, except to the extent that the internet itself is a public square.
There are also other platforms that do the same thing as Substack, like Ghost.
It's utterly ridiculous to think that Substack somehow represents a gatekeeper to the world of newsletter blogs.
I like the people who run Substack, and the web design looks nice, but if the company got nuked tomorrow, Noahpinion would be up and running on another platform within a day, with all of the same subscribers.
2/Biden's relief bill has no less than FIVE major cash benefit programs ($1400 checks, Pandemic UI, rental assistance, health care assistance, and the child tax credit).
3/When I was a kid, everyone was worried about welfare dependency and poor people being paid not to work. Workfare thus became the most popular approach.