A thread on an important topic that not enough people know about: the s-curve. It shows us how technologies develop, and it helps explain a lot about how and when certain technologies win, and when startups should enter a market. I'll illustrate with the history of the ebook! 1/n
The S-curve shows you how a technology's capabilities change over time and investment. But I want to start with a caveat: when and why this happens is complex. If you want to know more about those complexities, this article is a good place to start. 2/ hbs.edu/ris/Publicatio…
Technologies usually begin with an "Era of Ferment" where everyone knows a new tech is coming, but companies experiment with possible forms. In the case of e-books, there were lots of options: In-bookstore printing! Serials you paid for by the chapter! The Sony Data Discman! 3/
Eventually, a winning technology emerges - we call this the "dominant design." Suddenly, when Amazon gets up to speed, everyone knows what an ebook is: it looks like a Kindle! It is a e-ink device with few buttons, optimized for reading & it is connected to a ebook store. 4/
Now there is a period of take-off, where companies compete around a single concept. Prices fall, capabilities increase and, one-by-one, competitors drop out as the fail to keep up, as you can see in this awesome chart by Jim Utterback, looking at 150 years of tech competition. 5
Eventually, the technology begins to mature and stagnate, either because it is too expensive to develop or inertia has set in. Instead of capability, competitors try to out market each other with various luxury tweaks and fixes: Waterproof! Better buttons! Color choices! 6/
Finally, along comes a new technology, one that is just starting up its S-curve, that disrupts the old technology. Now, how & when this happens is a subject of vigorous academic debate currently. This article is a good summary of some of the thoughts: 7/ timharford.com/2018/10/why-bi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ethan Mollick

Ethan Mollick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emollick

20 Mar
Here’s a super useful paper: we spend 15% of work in meetings (managers spend 50%!) & post-COVID meetings are up 14%. But we spend too little time trying to make meetings better, even though there’s lots of research on the topic! Here’s a review of it all: researchgate.net/publication/32… ImageImageImage
Here’s an emoji filled summary of best practices. Before the meeting:
✅only meet if needed
👯‍♀️make sure to only invite people who need to be there.
🎯set clear goals & outcomes
📄have an agenda that all review in advance
⏰make it short & relevant to all invited
During the meeting...
⏱arrive on time
📋follow the agenda
🙋‍♀️🙋‍♂️everyone participates
💻📱never multitask
⚔️intervene if mood turns negative
🤪humor helps performance
🙅‍♀️leave time for objections
🗳Let everyone help decision-making. If a decision is made, tell everyone
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
A tweet is about 1kb of memory*. All of the pictured things can store one tweet:
Two Babbage Analytical Engines
37 punch cards
A Russian woven electronic core memory module
This hard drive built inside Minecraft

*280 characters of up to 4 eight byte octets each in UTF-8. ImageImageImageImage
For reference, the Apollo Guidance Computer, which got humans to the moon, did so with an amount of memory equivalent to 8 tweets.
Scientists have also successfully built logic gates by using swarms of soldier crabs. It takes about 80 🦀 to operate a logic gate, and there are 8 logic gates in a byte, so 640,000 crabs can be used to store a single tweet. Which seems kind of horrifying. 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
13 Mar
A third of all genetics papers published in Nature over a decade (and 20% across all journals) had errors due to the fact that many gene have names like SEPT2 (the official name of Septin 2), which were automatically coded as dates by Microsoft Excel. genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
Also an Excel error cost led to an estimated 1,500 deaths in the UK last year. The UK COVID contact tracing effort saved to an old Excel file format (.XLS) rather than the new one (.XLSX) & smaller row limits resulted in names being dropped. They were never contacted by tracers.
It was easier to change genetics than to change Excel (or to get people to stop using Excel to track data it wasn’t built for... or to get people to understand how to format cells). 27 genes have so far been renamed to deal with the date problem.
Read 4 tweets
12 Mar
I think we underestimate how much COVID disruption will help big organizations in the long run. So many bad routines were disrupted, and new improvisation rewarded. Reminds me of this paper: when star NBA players are injured the rest of the team has improve & create new patterns.
I’ve been talking to people at big companies that thought they would not have been able to make the switch to online, and it is clear that the sudden disruption to routines led to revelations. It is like a version of @work_matters & Rao’s subtraction game. hbr.org/2014/02/scalin…
Plus, the fact that every other competitor was disrupted in at the same time meant a breather from competitive pressure during the most confusing period. And the backstop of government aid helped, too.

So the real question is: what did your company learn from COVID practices?
Read 4 tweets
11 Mar
I am somewhat thrilled that NFTs immediately moved beyond parody. Here’s people bidding to acquire a signed tweet about people bidding to get a signed Pokémon card. Image
And now you can buy a signed copy of my tweet about signed copies of another tweet about signed Pokémon cards. Please don’t buy it: v.cent.co/tweet/13700528… @Cent
Probably still beats substack as a long-term business model though.
Read 5 tweets
6 Mar
The most sci-fi aspect of this century: if space development continues at the present rate, it is likely that the last time in history that all of of humanity was on Earth at the same time was November 2, 2000.
Currently, it looks like the moment that the ISS is retired (likely 2028) the private Axiom modules being attached to it will become their own commercial space station - the one in the image. And that assumes that no one else builds another space station first. After that? 🌙 🔴
The population of space. (The next barrier to cross: surpassing the maximum space population record...13) nefariousplots.com/figures/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!