Every so often someone has an enlightenment about the nature of gender in trans people and tries to tell everyone the "right" way to process their gender (usually that it's not innate) and I feel as I often do that calling it "gender identity" has caused people to just push all
the correct discourse about how *gender* is a social construct onto gender identity without significant analysis as to what gender identity may be, how it might come about, etc. And I do not think that it's really accurate or necessary to simply say "gender identity" is itself
identical to or drawn entirely from the social construct of gender. I don't mean to say that gender is innate or whatever, but that does NOT mean people aren't ~really~ their gender, given that social constructs are real, just often arbitrary and can change all the time.
But people who don't neatly fit into cisnormative systems of gender have existed throughout history. This account is from someone born 735 years ago. I strictly mean people who would if they could have sought medical and social transition, not any
given culture's specific genders as I'm not qualified to speak on them, but people who are like "I need to change my body because it's making miserable in this specific way" have been around forever.
Mostly I think telling people how to process, describe, explain, or inhabit their gender is not the way to get to any kind of liberation. But it is a great way to antagonize people. I often say gender is fake, but my experience of my own body and gender dating back to my
earliest memories feels more fundamental than "women are like this and men are like that" and while I can't explain it, or why my understanding of my gender has changed in the ways it has, but I can't really conceive of my transness as anything but an innate part of myself.
I didn't just wake up at three years old and decide "I don't want to be a boy" it's just something I *knew* well enough to say out loud until I was effectively abused until stopping when I was four. But it wasn't just that, I had body parts that didn't fit or even feel like mine.
And like I'm not going to claim there's any such thing as objectively real genders, like man, woman, neutrois, agender, the many kinds of nonbinary, genderfluid, bigender, genderqueer, etc. Not in the sense of anyone fundamentally and innately being these genders.
But I don't think transness itself can be explained in the same way, just modulated by any society's gender system. If I grew up in a culture where my gender was accepted right away I don't know how I would have turned out, but I'd hope there'd be much less trauma involved.
what I think: Everyone* is literally the gender they say they are now, the gender say they were before, and I have no desire to put that under a microscope and interrogate whether they can "really be that gender"
* Cis, trans, nonbinary, agender, etc applies to everyone
In the past I was a woman, but it made me unhappy over time. Now I'm neutrois, and I can see signs of it going back to childhood, the fact is it's felt right for the past near-decade, even if I tried to soften it as "agender" for a few years and then got on the gender whirlwind
immediately after and honestly because of finally getting bottom surgery.
However, I have never in my life been a boy and definitely not a man.
Obv being plural makes this more complicated but that's a lot of personal history I'm not sharing publicly
* progesterone acts as an anxiolytic not anti-
Also the experience of "being a gender" is so highly subjective anyone could just be like "I'm actually not binary" and it'd be perfectly fine. I don't care if anyone can pass any trans/nonbinary/agender purity tests because there shouldn't be any.
There's no need to worry over whether someone who just came out as nonbinary is *really* *genuinely* *irrefutably* nonbinary. Or even a different binary gender. Experimenting and figuring things out should be something wonderful, not fraught with terror as transphobes claim
If cis people want to try different pronouns, go for it. Please, if that's something you want to try, if it helps you feel more content or happy or comfortable then go for it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Watching more and more people draw explicit connections and comparisons from the "GC" movement to fascism and constantly remembering people who insisted for years that the GC movement is itself not inherently fascist
The cool stuff here is it's all stuff that's been pointed out over and over again by multiple people, even with direct comparisons to various definitions of fascism but it's somehow more important to acknowledge Julie Bindel's done good work than that she wants trans people gone.
There's no common ground. There's no compromise. Nothing will be good enough for them but ending our ability to exist as trans people. They openly fantasize about sending us to concentration camps, compare us to groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Stasi, constantly promote
So I'm critical of psychiatry and psychology as fields, especially as they often stigmatize and pathologize normal human behaviors. But I'm also dubious of people claiming to fight ableism and then spreading misinformation about, say, ADHD.
Misinformation about diagnosis, treatment, and etiology, leading people to think ADHD is something it isn't, or is possibly an entirely "bogus" diagnosis, or that stimulants don't show particular efficacy, or that it's caused by parents not disciplining their children.
Like sure advocate for neurodiversity and be critical of psychology and psychiatry but don't be Thomas Szasz. Don't misrepresent screening tools as diagnostic. Don't tell people that effective treatments are really ineffective.
It's pretty invasive how cis people take it upon themselves to lecture trans people on what they believe isn't transphobia, to the point that they'll say "sure, this person wants you and everyone like you to die, but they said they support a few critical rights for trans people"
"Sure, he defends a well known conversion therapist, and argues that trans kids can't really be sure they're really trans, but he never *said* he supported conversion therapy, so you can't say he does."
"Sure she said trans women are a threat to cis women and girls but she also said she'd march in a trans rights parade so how can you say she's transphobic?"
People keep arguing that Singal isn't transphobic. Not only is Singal transphobic but he thinks most progressives agree with him on transphobia. A story in image form. At least two tweets' worth.
Original tweet by a mutual but I don't want creeps to find it.
Conclusion of that story about Jesse insisting that the Womanhood Redefined article in American Conservative is something most progressives agree with. Also, Free Republic's response to that article. Singal agrees with terf rhetoric and said so
Isn't it weird that someone who is so sympathetic toward trans people and not transphobic at all would agree with an article that explicitly sets out to frame trans women as evil unreasonable monsters who demand too much when they want human decency and respect?
Wondering if I should go through the Zucker and Atlantic articles line by line and show that a reasonable person can in fact conclude that Jesse "Slime Weasel" Singal supports conversion therapy for trans kids. The people in Jude Doyle's mentions right now are relying on a
shallow reading of the article where he never actually says the words "I support conversion therapy" while ignoring all insinuations and outside context.
Do people remember how he got information for the Atlantic article from at least one ROGD-promiting website?
The gee cees were hecking mad he didn't credit them for information he received from them. Anyway, if I did do this it would be because virtue singal threatens legal action against people who speak of him in any terms not reserved for the highest of angels. And it'd be an article