Trading is a business of Probabilities not Certainty. So the road to Trading success is to take many high probability Trades and let the odds play out in your favor. 'Many Trades' is key here because probability is subject to the law of large numbers.
The very worst Traders are the ones who rely on certainty- the kind who look for a 80-90% success rate in the Trades they do. You can find then all over Twitter extolling the remarkable accuracy of some 'gurus' calls while singing his praises
Backtesting is the hot topic these days and relies on years of data to arrive at the Expectancy of a Trading System or Strategy while giving you a fairly good idea of the volatility of the Returns you can expect and the drawdowns you can be subjected too
But this is by no means the Holy Grail of Trading. Many renowned Traders- including the famous Richard Dennis of Turtle Traders fame- have met their end by swearing by their systems. Markets are always capable of producing events that make a mockery of any System created
My own Trading is a blend of a System and Discretion. The Option Chain provides the odds of a Trade working out as well as any backtested strategy. Problem is that while a 70% Probability will work out over large number of Trades, there's no saying what will happen over next 100
So the key is to ensure that the damage caused by an adverse sequence one has to have a methodology to keep losses down to acceptable levels during these times. To do this, I use rudimentary TA to cut losing Trades without waiting for the final outcome to play out
While this reduces the success rate below theoretical levels to an extent- cutting out otherwise good Trades which turn out to be successful after being scratched- it also greatly reduces the losses incurred on other losers that don't
So let's assume that you have reason to believe that an underlying will hold a particular level and is in an uptrend. Selling a 30 delta put has a theoretical 70% chance of success. After factoring in the Premium, maybe 75%. If IV>HV maybe 80%.
The Market does not provide any free lunches, so the Expectancy of any Trade at the start is 0. A 70% POP Trade requires you to Risk 7 to make 3. So to develop a Positive Expectancy, the Risk of 7 has to be brought down. There are a number of ways to achieve this
The first is to follow good Option Trading Practices. Ensure Volatility is relatively high and you have sufficient time in your favor. Second if you are Trading long, chose the strongest Stocks in the strongest Sectors. Use the concept of Relative Strength to the fullest
Third, most good Trades work right off the bat. Set an exit if the Trade is not working out at a level where your loss will be minimal. Very often, if you are a seller, the time decay will compensate largely for such losses or may even result in a small Profit
Most importantly follow the law of large numbers. Trade small and Trade often. Diversify your Trades over underlying, time and strategies. Have some rule of thumb to evaluate your Portfolio Risk.
And be prepared for anything. In some months the Trading Gods will smile at you and most Trades will work out without a hitch. In others, all hell will break loose and you will have a lot of work to do. But it will all work out in the end. The Laws of Probability say so.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Have had a number of DM's following the elearning video. Clarifying some issues. Please understand I am not an intraday Trader and obviously my methods will not apply to short very term time frames. The first was on how I identify levels
I do it in the evening after the Market and I look at Support or Resistance on Candlestick Charts Also for common Patterns both for entry and failure. I look at P&F Charts- 1% on a daily TF. I will also use Relative Strength to identify sectors and the best/worst stocks in them
Will also look at Renko Charts as Swing Points are easier to identify on them. Sometimes I will also look at OI for underlying where I have larger stakes. Of course will always keep an eye on IV's. Once I have these levels, I will use them to take positions the next day
The power of beliefs is amazing! I lost almost a 1000 followers because many were offended when I said that one required a crore to make a living from Trading. People desperately want to believe that they can regularly churn out 60-75k monthly with an investment of 3-10 lacs
By the same token they want to ignore Nithin Kamath's recent statement that only 1% on Zerodha make better than FD Returns from Trading. They would much rather believe Trainers who claim that 80% of their Trainees make outsize Returns from the Market.
The other reason many were upset was that I never discussed any charts or strategy. That's because I don't believe in the one size fits all approach. How you form a view is important and is the soul of your trade. How you structure a strategy around that view is unique to you 1/2
There is a popular saying- 'lies, damn lies, and statistics.' Most Risk Management philosophies that Traders base their systems on are grounded on some form of statistics be they Expectancy, RR, Win Loss Ratio, Drawdowns etc. But how realistic are these really?
So a system with an Expectancy of 1 means you will make 1 on every 1 Risked. But over how many Trades has this Expectancy been calculated? 100, 1,000, 10,000? Statistics on such types of analysis generally follow a Normal Distribution represented by the famous Bell Curve
To get a good representation of how a system will work out, you need a very large set of observations. Very few Traders capture these. Secondly, and more importantly, the figure is not absolute. It is subject to a fairly wide range of variance
There are many great setups from some of the world's best Traders in the world available for on the web- all of which have edge and provide a great living for their practitioners. Some such as breakouts, pullbacks, flags, pennants etc are simple and well known even to beginners
Unfortunately 95% of Traders are unable to Trade them profitably and waste their entire life in trying to discover one which they can. The problem is not in the setup per se but with other issues such as Capital Allocation, Position Sizing, Money Management and Psychology
All these issues appear to be very simple in nature, and can probably be summarized in one page, but turn out to be extremely difficult to implement in practice. To some extent they are counter intuitive to the way we are conditioned to think.
There is a feeling that by System Trading you can somehow miraculously dramatically cut down the time to become a Profitable Trader. Nothing can be further from the truth. forbes.com/sites/brettste…
And I feel that many new System Traders are too quick to pronounce it as the best way to Trade. Let them take one of the inevitable big drawdowns that this type of Trading results in and then we'll talk.
Lot of feedback on this tweet. I am not against System Trading. In fact I have been trying to find one to deploy some part of my Capital unsuccessfully for the last 2 years. Let me attempt to explain the difficulty in another way
I have always been a discretionary Trader. Have made several attempts at trying my hand at System Trading but somehow have never cottoned on to the idea mainly for 2 reasons. Firstly, the concept of backtesting goes against my core beliefs.
Unlike others who have attained great success with backtested Strategies, my belief is that every moment in the Markets is unique and just because a certain Strategy worked in the past doesn't guarantee it will work in the future
Secondly, I find the idea of accepting big- and I find 10% huge- unacceptable even though the end result may be a huge payoff in the long run. Trading high Probability Options Strategies has spoilt me and I rarely have losing months let alone drawdowns.