Yes, this is an inconvenience that I (for different reasons) experience. That said, it is an inconvenience because of the rich uniqueness of our origins. Let's not demand that everyone understand our unique circumstances. That said, I can relate.
I've got a personal dislike for my name, but there's too much inertia for me to make any changes. My name is the 'John Smith' equivalent in Spanish. Completely generic without identity. What's even worse, it exposes a false identity. I don't even speak Spanish!
Anyway, minor rant. It's the inconveniences and misunderstandings that make life human and interesting. A life without inconvenience is a life devoid of meaning.
Now if you ever do find me responding to your Spanish question in Spanish, then that's via Google translate. ;-) One day when I retire, I will spend more time learning the language.
As a young person, I did not realize the importance of learning other languages. Think of the superpower that many multi-lingual speakers have in their ability to connect to many more people.
This was most evident in a trip to Europe where the people who I was with just spoke a multitude of different languages to each other. It's a sad state of affairs if all you can speak is English.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

21 Mar
The notion of differences between individuals and differences across classes of individuals isn't precisely quantifiable for brains. I think neuroscience is doing civilization a disservice by insisting on reductionist theories to quantify people.
A natural human tendency is to think like people think in the same way. Some people are surprised that other people might not vocalize their thoughts. Other people are surprised to find that some people can't visualize their thoughts.
But the brain is constructed by the accumulation of a multitude of mental habits. We grow by favoring one kind of habit over another. Many habits are not necessary, but we favor them because that is what we are used to.
Read 14 tweets
16 Mar
There's is a massive asymmetric information gap between knowing a theory is wrong and discovering the correct theory. Becoming aware of flaws is just the first step in a very long journey. But if you never see the flaws, you never take the journey and thus never get anywhere.
This is a double-edged sword. So we see flaws that are simply not there and take a journey, towards discovery, that is along a deceptive path. The path where one sticks to because it's the one without forks. The one that continually confirms one's own biases.
Persistence requires a level of naivety, this is what keeps us motivated. This is because if we knew how long the journey was before we began, then we might have never started it at all.
Read 10 tweets
15 Mar
Lazy Twitter: What was the name of that hypothesis that the technologies that were not the best but were most widely distributed would become the ones that take over the world? Do you know what I'm referring to?
I seem to recall that it was also used as an argument why the Apple M1 was so fast. I don't recall though the name of the theory or who came up with it. debugger.medium.com/why-is-apples-…
It's also related to how the successful programming languages are not the most elegant or powerful ones, but the kinds that just have the best fit at the time of its adoption. I also forget what they called this observation!
Read 4 tweets
15 Mar
Lazy Twitter: What is a good metaphor for biology?
I'm asking this because the usual bias about biology is that because it is made of wet stuff that we are biased to think of like a massively scaled chemical engineering process.
We don't think of biology like it is the dry stuff that we find in semiconductor technology. That is where the scope of control is in the movement of few elementary particles (i.e. electrons and protons).
Read 7 tweets
14 Mar
Reading list for researchers who have discovered the language turn. Image
Ordered like a conceptual stack. At the foundation is surprisingly a not too well-known approach to fundamental physics.
Revised stack after reading @markburgess_osl epilogue. Image
Read 4 tweets
12 Mar
The fact that our civilization does not have a right to repair is all you need to know to realize the fundamental misalignment of the economic model and that of sustainability.
The kinds of human technologies that we build are incompatible with the biological world. They are incompatible with everything else that we build. We are in a constant march towards greater and greater incompatibility.
Gone are the days where you can fix things. The only recourse is to throw broken things away. That is because corporations are incentivized to manufacture cheaply rather than building things to last.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!